Classification of EMG Signals for Assessment of Neuromuscular Disorders

An accurate and computationally efficient means of feature extraction of electromyographic (EMG) signal patterns has been the subject of considerable research effort in recent years. Quantitative analysis of EMG signals provides an important source of information for the classification of neuromuscular disorders. The objective of this study is to discriminate between normal (NOR), myopathic (MYO) and neuropathic (NEURO) subjects. The experiment consisted of 22 pathogenic (11 MYO and 11 NEURO) and 12 healthy persons. The signals were recorded at 30% Maximum Voluntary Contraction (MVC) for 5 seconds. Features of MUAPs extracted in time have been quantitatively analysed. We have used binary SVM for classification. Separation of normal subjects from neuromuscular disease subjects has an accuracy of 83.45%, whereas separation of subjects from the two types of subjects (myopathic and neuropathic) has an accuracy of 68.29% which is again high. 

[1]  R Le Bars,et al.  Automatic classification of electromyographic signals. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  Steen Andreassen,et al.  MUNIN: an expert system for EMG , 1987 .

[3]  R. Lippmann,et al.  An introduction to computing with neural nets , 1987, IEEE ASSP Magazine.

[4]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  Neural network PC tools: a practical guide , 1990 .

[5]  C S Pattichis,et al.  Medical diagnostic systems: a case for neural networks. , 1994, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[6]  Constantinos S. Pattichis,et al.  Neural network models in EMG diagnosis , 1995 .

[7]  C.I. Christodoulou,et al.  Unsupervised pattern recognition for the classification of EMG signals , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[9]  Hyun-Chul Kim,et al.  Constructing support vector machine ensemble , 2003, Pattern Recognit..

[10]  Leontios J. Hadjileontiadis,et al.  A Surface Electromyography Classification System , 2004 .

[11]  Sabri Koçer,et al.  Classification of EMG Signals Using PCA and FFT , 2005, Journal of Medical Systems.

[12]  Christos D. Katsis,et al.  A novel method for automated EMG decomposition and MUAP classification , 2006, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[13]  Mustafa Yilmaz,et al.  Classification of EMG signals using wavelet neural network , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  Anders Fuglsang-Frederiksen,et al.  The role of different EMG methods in evaluating myopathy , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  Christos D. Katsis,et al.  A two-stage method for MUAP classification based on EMG decomposition , 2007, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[16]  Sabri Koçer,et al.  Classification of Emg Signals Using Neuro-Fuzzy System and Diagnosis of Neuromuscular Diseases , 2010, Journal of Medical Systems.

[17]  Constantinos S. Pattichis,et al.  Multiscale entropy-based approach to automated surface EMG classification of neuromuscular disorders , 2010, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[18]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Classification of Normal, Neuropathic, and Myopathic Electromyograph Signals Using Nonlinear Dynamics Method , 2011 .

[19]  Miki Nikolic,et al.  EMGTools, an Adaptive and Versatile Tool for Detailed EMG Analysis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.