A meta-analysis of randomized trials of rescue percutaneous coronary intervention after failed fibrinolysis.

[1]  C. Schmid,et al.  Is primary angioplasty for some as good as primary angioplasty for all? , 2002, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[2]  W. French,et al.  Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for failed thrombolysis , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[3]  S. Stevens,et al.  Rescue angioplasty after failed thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  S. Nekolla,et al.  Mechanical Reperfusion in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Presenting More Than 12 Hours From Symptom Onset: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2005 .

[5]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  A randomized trial of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty as a rescue intervention after failed thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  S. Iliceto,et al.  Time delay-adjusted survival benefit of angioplasty over thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: influence of time from symptom onset. , 2004, Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[7]  G. Lamas,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients wi , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  M. de Belder,et al.  A randomized trial of rescue angioplasty versus a conservative approach for failed fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the Middlesbrough Early Revascularization to Limit INfarction (MERLIN) trial. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  G. Tadros,et al.  Angiographic and Long-Term Outcomes of “Rescue” Stenting versus PTCA in Failed Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2004, Angiology.

[10]  P. Caravelli,et al.  Role of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in rescue percutaneous coronary interventions. , 2004, Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[11]  A. Rubboli,et al.  Systematic coronary stenting after failed thrombolysis in high‐risk patients with acute myocardial infarction: procedural results and long‐term follow‐up , 2003, Coronary artery disease.

[12]  K. Oldroyd,et al.  Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for failed thrombolysis: results from a district general hospital , 2002, Postgraduate medical journal.

[13]  G. Musumeci,et al.  Abciximab improves 6-month clinical outcome after rescue coronary angioplasty. , 2002, American heart journal.

[14]  W. Dassen,et al.  Ten-year experience with early angioplasty in 759 patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  S. Ellis,et al.  Review of immediate angioplasty after fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: insights from the RESCUE I, RESCUE II, and other contemporary clinical experiences. , 2000, American heart journal.

[16]  H. Suryapranata,et al.  Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterization laboratory. The PRAGUE study. , 2000, European heart journal.

[17]  M. Eisenberg,et al.  Identification and Management of Patients with Failed Thrombolysis after Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  R. Califf,et al.  Effectiveness of early coronary angioplasty and abciximab for failed thrombolysis (reteplase or alteplase) during acute myocardial infarction (results from the GUSTO-III trial). Global Use of Strategies To Open occluded coronary arteries. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  W. Dassen,et al.  Prospective randomised comparison between thrombolysis, rescue PTCA, and primary PTCA in patients with extensive myocardial infarction admitted to a hospital without PTCA facilities: a safety and feasibility study , 1999, Heart.

[20]  D. Holmes,et al.  Rescue angioplasty after failed thrombolysis: technical and clinical outcomes in a large thrombolysis trial. GUSTO-1 Angiographic Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  B. Prendergast,et al.  What do we do when thrombolysis fails? A United Kingdom survey. , 1997, International journal of cardiology.

[22]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Rescue angioplasty in the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 4 trial. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  R. Califf,et al.  Metaanalysis of five reported studies on the relation of early coronary patency grades with mortality and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Value of rescue percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty following unsuccessful thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Investigators. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[25]  R. Califf,et al.  Link between the angiographic substudy and mortality outcomes in a large randomized trial of myocardial reperfusion. Importance of early and complete infarct artery reperfusion. GUSTO-I Investigators. , 1995, Circulation.

[26]  E. Topol,et al.  Randomized comparison of rescue angioplasty with conservative management of patients with early failure of thrombolysis for acute anterior myocardial infarction. , 1994, Circulation.

[27]  L. Becker,et al.  TIMI Perfusion Grade 3 but Not Grade 2 Results in Improved Outcome After Thrombolysis for Myocardial Infarction Ventriculographic, Enzymatic, Electrocardiographic Evidence From the TEAM‐3 Study , 1993, Circulation.

[28]  I. Belenkie,et al.  Rescue angioplasty during myocardial infarction has a beneficial effect on mortality: a tenable hypothesis. , 1992, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[29]  J. Anderson,et al.  Does thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) perfusion grade 2 represent a mostly patent artery or a mostly occluded artery? Enzymatic and electrocardiographic evidence from the TEAM-2 study. Second Multicenter Thrombolysis Trial of Eminase in Acute Myocardial Infarction. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  R. Califf,et al.  Fate of patients with acute myocardial infarction with patency of the infarct-related vessel achieved with successful thrombolysis versus rescue angioplasty. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.