Compensatory postural adaptations during continuous, variable amplitude perturbations reveal generalized rather than sequence-specific learning

We examined changes in the motor organization of postural control in response to continuous, variable amplitude oscillations evoked by a translating platform and explored whether these changes reflected implicit sequence learning. The platform underwent random amplitude (maximum ± 15 cm) and constant frequency (0.5 Hz) oscillations. Each trial was composed of three 15-s segments containing seemingly random oscillations. Unbeknownst to participants, the middle segment was repeated in each of 42 trials on the first day of testing and in an additional seven trials completed approximately 24 h later. Kinematic data were used to determine spatial and temporal components of total body centre of mass (COM) and joint segment coordination. Results showed that with repeated trials, participants reduced their magnitude of COM displacement, shifted from a COM phase lag to a phase lead relative to platform motion and increased correlations between ankle/platform motion and hip/platform motion as they shifted from an ankle strategy to a multi-segment control strategy involving the ankle and hip. Maintenance of these changes across days provided evidence for learning. Similar improvements for the random and repeated segments, indicated that participants did not exploit the sequence of perturbations to improve balance control. Rather, the central nervous system may have been tuning into more general features of platform motion. These findings provide important insight into the generalizabilty of improved compensatory balance control with training.

[1]  H. Sveistrup,et al.  Age-related changes in postural responses to externally- and self-triggered continuous perturbations. , 2006, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[2]  Pierre Perruchet,et al.  Learning from Implicit Learning Literature: Comment on Shea, Wulf, Whitacre, and Park (2001) , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  F. Horak,et al.  Emergence of postural patterns as a function of vision and translation frequency. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  K M Newell,et al.  Postural coordination patterns as a function of dynamics of the support surface. , 2001, Human movement science.

[5]  V. Dietz,et al.  Human stance on a sinusoidally translating platform: balance control by feedforward and feedback mechanisms , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  P G Zanone,et al.  Evolution of behavioral attractors with learning: nonequilibrium phase transitions. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  R P Maguire,et al.  Cerebral activation related to skills practice in a double serial reaction time task: striatal involvement in random-order sequence learning. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[8]  M. Schieppati,et al.  Variability in a dynamic postural task attests ample flexibility in balance control mechanisms , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Antonio Nardone,et al.  Standing on a continuously moving platform: is body inertia counteracted or exploited? , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Wynne A. Lee,et al.  Relative stability improves with experience in a dynamic standing task , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  K M Newell,et al.  Energy expenditure and motor performance relationships in humans learning a motor task. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[12]  M P Remler,et al.  Long latency postural responses are functionally modified by cognitive set. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  C. Shea,et al.  Surfing the Implicit Wave , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  Karl M Newell,et al.  Learning to coordinate redundant degrees of freedom in a dynamic balance task. , 2003, Human movement science.

[15]  S Corna,et al.  Postural coordination in elderly subjects standing on a periodically moving platform. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  L. Rowell,et al.  Exercise : regulation and integration of multiple systems , 1996 .

[17]  Fay B. Horak,et al.  Transitions in a postural task: do the recruitment and suppression of degrees of freedom stabilize posture? , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[19]  F. Horak,et al.  Influence of central set on human postural responses. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  F. Horak,et al.  Postural perturbations: new insights for treatment of balance disorders. , 1997, Physical therapy.

[22]  Kelly J. Cole.  Motor control and learning—A behavioural emphasis, second edition , 1988 .

[23]  David A. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 1990 .

[24]  Dominique Ginhac,et al.  Implicit learning of a repeated segment in continuous tracking: A reappraisal , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  R W Pew,et al.  Levels of analysis in motor control. , 1974, Brain research.

[26]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Learning the structure of event sequences. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  R. Schmidt,et al.  VARIABILITY OF PRACTICE AND IMPLICIT MOTOR LEARNING , 1997 .

[28]  R. Magill.  1997 C. H. McCloy Research Lecture: Knowledge is more than we can talk about: implicit learning in motor skill acquisition. , 1998, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[29]  M. Ioffe,et al.  Characteristics of Learning Voluntary Control of Posture in Lesions of the Pyramidal and Nigrostriatal Systems , 2004, Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology.