18F-choline PET/CT physiological distribution and pitfalls in image interpretation: experience in 80 patients with prostate cancer

Objectives18F-choline positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is an integral part in restaging of patients with prostate cancer (PC). The aim of this study was to describe the whole-body physiologic distribution of 18F-choline and to discuss some abnormal sites of uptake not related to PC we observed. Materials and methodsEighty consecutive patients submitted to 18F-choline PET/CT imaging for primary staging or biochemical recurrence (prostate specific antigen rising) after treatment of PC was considered. Whole-body PET/CT was acquired approximately 40 min after 18F-choline injection. ResultsWe observed physiological 18F-choline uptake in liver, pancreas, spleen, salivary and lachrymal glands and also, owing to renal excretion, in urinary tract. Other sites of less intense tracer uptake were bone marrow and intestines. We found abnormal and unexpected PET findings in 15 patients (18.7%), not owing to PC localizations. The majority of these findings were owing to inflammation (12 of 15); a case of low grade lymphoma was detected; two patients showed focal brain uptake of 18F-choline and were subsequently submitted to magnetic resonance: in one a meningioma and in the other a low-grade brain tumour were diagnosed. ConclusionAccurate knowledge of the biodistribution of 18F-choline is essential for the correct interpretation of PET/CT imaging. CT enables differentiation of physiological bowel activity and 18F-choline excretion in the ureters. In our series, 18F-choline uptake in benign pathological conditions mainly included sites of inflammation; nevertheless, accumulation in tumour deposits not because PC cannot be excluded, particularly in the brain, where correlative imaging with magnetic resonance is of the utmost importance.

[1]  T. DeGrado,et al.  Cancer imaging with fluorine-18-labeled choline derivatives. , 2007, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[2]  Tomio Inoue,et al.  Brain tumour imaging with carbon-11 choline: comparison with FDG PET and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  J. Mercer Molecular imaging agents for clinical positron emission tomography in oncology other than fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG): applications, limitations and potential. , 2007, Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques.

[4]  Akira Matsumura,et al.  New observations concerning the interpretation of magnetic resonance spectroscopy of meningioma , 2008, European Radiology.

[5]  N. Blumstein,et al.  PET und PET/CT in der Rezidivdiagnostik des Prostatakarzinoms , 2006, Der Urologe.

[6]  Osama Mawlawi,et al.  PET/CT imaging artifacts. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine technology.

[7]  M. Picchio,et al.  PET-CT for treatment planning in prostate cancer. , 2009, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....

[8]  A. Pupi,et al.  Role of whole-body 18F-choline PET/CT in disease detection in patients with biochemical relapse after radical treatment for prostate cancer , 2008, La radiologia medica.

[9]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  The detection rate of [11C]Choline-PET/CT depends on the serum PSA-value in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[10]  M. Soler,et al.  PET/TAC con 11C-colina y 18F-FDG en pacientes con elevación de PSA tras tratamiento radical de un cáncer de próstata , 2009 .

[11]  H. Groen,et al.  Comparison of (11)C-choline and (18)F-FDG PET in primary diagnosis and staging of patients with thoracic cancer. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  [PET/CT with (11)C-choline and (18)F-FDG in patients with elevated PSA after radical treatment of a prostate cancer]. , 2009, Revista espanola de medicina nuclear.

[13]  L. Kostakoglu,et al.  PET-CT fusion imaging in differentiating physiologic from pathologic FDG uptake. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[14]  J. Pruim,et al.  Carbon-11 choline or FDG-PET for staging of oesophageal cancer? , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  B. Weber,et al.  18F-choline in experimental soft tissue infection assessed with autoradiography and high-resolution PET , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[16]  G. Cook,et al.  Pitfalls in PET/CT interpretation. , 2007, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....

[17]  G. Glatting,et al.  [PET and PET/CT in relapsing prostate carcinoma]. , 2006, Der Urologe. Ausg. A.

[18]  I. Fogelman,et al.  The role of fluorodeoxyglucose, 18F-dihydroxyphenylalanine, 18F-choline, and 18F-fluoride in bone imaging with emphasis on prostate and breast. , 2006, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[19]  Jing-han Chen,et al.  The role of 11C‐choline positron emission tomographycomputed tomography and videomediastinoscopy in the evaluation of diseases of middle mediastinum , 2006, Chinese medical journal.