FIELD DEPENDENCE, SENSATION SEEKING AND DRIVING BEHAVIOUR

The present study attempted to relate field dependence-independence (FDI) to accident involvement and perceived causes of accidents as well as to trace these relationships to the sensation-seeking (SS) tendency of the field-dependent driver. In addition, the concomittant effects of internal/external locus of control (IE) were studied. Subjects (N=285) filled out a questionnaire assessing their level of FDI, SS, IE, number of accidents, as well as the attributed importance of various possible causes of their last accident. The obtained results show no relationship between FDI and SS and either the number of accidents or the importance attributed to various causes of accidents. Significant relationships were, however, obtained between FDI and SS and seat-belt use and SS and speed on the highway.

[1]  H. A. Witkin A Manual for the embedded figures tests , 1971 .

[2]  J. Rotter Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[3]  D. I. Smith,et al.  Official driver records and self-reports as sources of accident and conviction data for research purposes , 1976 .

[4]  W. L. Mihal,et al.  Individual differences in perceptual information processing and their relation to automobile accident involvement. , 1976, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  Herman A. Witkin,et al.  Personality through perception , 1954 .

[6]  H. A. Witkin,et al.  Field dependence and interpersonal behavior. , 1977 .

[7]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  Construct validity for the sensation-seeking scale. , 1968, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[8]  J R Treat,et al.  TRI-LEVEL STUDY OF THE CAUSES OF TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS: FINAL REPORT , 1979 .

[9]  Douglas N. Jackson,et al.  Evaluation of Group and Individual Forms of Embedded-Figures Measures of Field-Independence 1 , 1964 .

[10]  J. Williams Follow-up study of relationships between perceptual style measures and telephone company vehicle accidents. , 1977, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  D R Goodenough,et al.  A Review of Individual Differences in Field Dependence as a Factor in Auto Safety1 , 1976, Human factors.

[12]  D Shinar,et al.  Field Dependence and Driver Visual Search Behavior , 1978, Human factors.

[13]  D. Shinar,et al.  DRIVER PERFORMANCE AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN ATTENTION AND INFORMATION PROCESSING. VOLUME 1: DRIVER INATTENTION , 1978 .

[14]  R. M. Harano Relationship of Field Dependence and Motor-Vehicle-Accident Involvement , 1970 .

[15]  M. Zuckerman Sensation Seeking : Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal , 1979 .

[16]  R. Loo Individual Differences and the Perception of Traffic Signs , 1978, Human factors.

[17]  Second Edition,et al.  Statistical Package for the Social Sciences , 1970 .

[18]  Barrett Gv Relation between Embedded Figures Test performance and simulator behavior. , 1969 .

[19]  Raymond C. Peck,et al.  WITHDRAWN: Reprint of “The Prediction of Accident Liability Through Biographical Data And Psychometric Tests”☆ , 1973 .

[20]  E. I. Signori,et al.  On the Study of Personality Factors in Research on Driving Behavior , 1974, Perceptual and motor skills.

[21]  C. L. Thornton,et al.  Relationship between perceptual style and driver reaction to an emergency situation. , 1968, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  P. L. Olson Aspects of driving performance as a function of field dependence. , 1974 .

[23]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  Demographic influences in sensation seeking and expressions of sensation seeking in religion, smoking and driving habits , 1980 .

[24]  Robert Loo,et al.  Role of primary personality factors in the perception of traffic signs and driver violations and accidents , 1979 .