Statistical inference for food webs with emphasis on ecological networks via Bayesian melding

Quantifying activities in a food web or ecological network, and related aspects of dependence, has largely been either descriptive or deterministic. Although schemes exist for assessing the reliability of such quantification, many are far from being statistical in nature. Statistical modeling approaches are explored, with a focus on the ecosystem aspects of a food web. By employing Bayesian melding, we provide a new statistical inferential approach for understanding ecological networks in the context of mass balance. Our approach embodies the traditional deterministic views on network relations, yet it is developed on the basis of proper statistical inference that allows the estimation of physical quantities and probabilistic assessment of the estimation. We describe our approach, and illustrate it with a mass balance dataset. The practical advantage of our approach is a more realistic understanding of the network by incorporating natural measurement variability into deterministic beliefs about the relationships among measurements. The resulting inference thus forms a more honest representation of the true state of nature, and provides a formal assessment of balance before data are passed on to later stages of an ecological network analysis (ENA). We also demonstrate that general Bayesian inference for ENA can yield new ecological insight that may not be available through standard classical inference. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Network Role Analysis in the Study of Food Webs: An Application of Regular Role Coloration , 2001, J. Soc. Struct..

[2]  R. Christian,et al.  Uncertainty and the Use of Network Analysis for Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management , 2006 .

[3]  Andrew R. Solow Some random thoughts on the statistical analysis of food-web data , 2005 .

[4]  Villy Christensen,et al.  ECOPATH II − a software for balancing steady-state ecosystem models and calculating network characteristics , 1992 .

[5]  A. Raftery,et al.  Inference for Deterministic Simulation Models: The Bayesian Melding Approach , 2000 .

[6]  Kenneth A. Frank,et al.  Identifying cohesive subgroups , 1995 .

[7]  Philip H. Warren,et al.  Aquatic Food Webs: An Ecosystem Approach , 2008 .

[8]  A. Bundy,et al.  Can Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) recover? Exploring trophic explanations for the non-recovery of the cod stock on the eastern Scotian Shelf, Canada , 2005 .

[9]  Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al.  Quantitative methods for ecological network analysi , 2004, Comput. Biol. Chem..

[10]  Neal M. Williams,et al.  Species abundance and asymmetric interaction strength in ecological networks , 2007 .

[11]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Ecopath, Ecosim, and Ecospace as tools for evaluating ecosystem impact of fisheries , 2000 .

[12]  Bruce Hannon,et al.  Ecological network analysis : network construction , 2007 .

[13]  Michael D. Ward,et al.  Persistent Patterns of International Commerce , 2007 .

[14]  Anton H. Westveld,et al.  A mixed effects model for longitudinal relational and network data, with applications to international trade and conflict , 2010, 1009.1436.

[15]  A. Bundy Structure and functioning of the eastern Scotian Shelf ecosystem before and after the collapse of groundfish stocks in the early 1990s , 2005 .

[16]  R. Ulanowicz,et al.  The Seasonal Dynamics of The Chesapeake Bay Ecosystem , 1989 .

[17]  Timothy E. Essington,et al.  Evaluating the sensitivity of a trophic mass- balance model (Ecopath) to imprecise data inputs , 2007 .

[18]  Peter D. Hoff,et al.  Latent Space Approaches to Social Network Analysis , 2002 .

[19]  D. Mason,et al.  Compartments revealed in food-web structure , 2003, Nature.

[20]  S. McMahon,et al.  Networking Tips for Social Scientists and Ecologists , 2001, Science.

[21]  Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al.  Aquatic Food Webs , 2005 .