An analysis framework of research frontiers based on the large‐scale open academic graph

As a high‐quality and well‐structured dataset, the large‐scale open academic graph formed under the influence of the open science movement has created new research conditions for research frontier analysis. Constructing the analysis framework of research frontiers based on the large‐scale open academic graph can effectively promote the realization of data‐driven knowledge discovery and the analysis and decision‐making of sci‐tech intelligence. The definition and analysis methods of research frontiers were summarized through related studies, and the data structure of the specific open academic graph was investigated. The thoughts and steps of research frontier analysis based on the open academic graph were put forward, and an available analysis framework of research frontiers based on the large‐scale open academic graph was constructed. The proposed framework can achieve deep, relevant and dynamic analysis of research frontiers in various disciplines based on the emerging large‐scale open academic graph. It will provide a novel perspective for performing dynamic analysis across time and space, multidimensional analysis under multiple factors, and multiscale evolution analysis of research frontiers.

[1]  Rui Wang.  Corpus-independent Generic Keyphrase Extraction Using Word Embedding Vectors , 2015 .

[2]  William M. Pottenger,et al.  A Survey of Emerging Trend Detection in Textual Data Mining , 2004 .

[3]  Saïd Abdeddaïm,et al.  Accurate keyphrase extraction by discriminating overlapping phrases , 2014, J. Inf. Sci..

[4]  E. JeffreyGoldstein,et al.  Emergence as a Construct : History and Issues , 2000 .

[5]  Nick Cramer,et al.  Automatic Keyword Extraction from Individual Documents , 2010 .

[6]  Jie Tang,et al.  ArnetMiner: extraction and mining of academic social networks , 2008, KDD.

[7]  H. Small,et al.  Identifying emerging topics in science and technology , 2014 .

[8]  Matús Medo,et al.  Quantifying and suppressing ranking bias in a large citation network , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[9]  Yang Song,et al.  An Overview of Microsoft Academic Service (MAS) and Applications , 2015, WWW.

[10]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  ACM TKDD Special Issue on Knowledge Discovery for Web Intelligence , 2010, TKDD.

[11]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents , 1973, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Jie Tang,et al.  A Combination Approach to Web User Profiling , 2010, TKDD.

[13]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Bursty and Hierarchical Structure in Streams , 2002, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[14]  James A. Evans,et al.  Open Access and Global Participation in Science , 2009, Science.

[15]  Rada Mihalcea,et al.  TextRank: Bringing Order into Text , 2004, EMNLP.

[16]  Atsuhiro Takasu,et al.  A Unified Approach for Learning Expertise and Authority in Digital Libraries , 2017, DASFAA.

[17]  H. Redkey,et al.  A new approach. , 1967, Rehabilitation record.

[18]  Mauricio Marrone,et al.  Application of entity linking to identify research fronts and trends , 2019, Scientometrics.

[19]  Wei Lu,et al.  Analyzing evolution of research topics with NEViewer: a new method based on dynamic co-word networks , 2014, Scientometrics.

[20]  Chia-Yen Chen,et al.  News topics categorization using latent Dirichlet allocation and sparse representation classifier , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics - Taiwan.

[21]  Cornelia Caragea,et al.  Extracting Keyphrases from Research Papers Using Citation Networks , 2014, AAAI.

[22]  Manoj Changat,et al.  Detection of paradigm shifts and emerging fields using scientific network: A case study of Information Technology for Engineering , 2015 .

[23]  Ge Wang,et al.  Hotspots Evolution and Frontier Analysis of Lean Construction Research—Integrated Scientometric Analysis using the Web of Science and Scopus Databases , 2015 .

[24]  C E Lipscomb,et al.  Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). , 2000, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[25]  Yves Gingras,et al.  A new approach for detecting scientific specialties from raw cocitation networks , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..