Quantifying the topography of the intrinsic energy landscape of flexible biomolecular recognition

Significance Biomolecular binding, which controls the realization of biomolecular function, is ubiquitous and fundamental to many cellular processes. We quantified the intrinsic energy landscapes of flexible biomolecular recognition—i.e., the binding–folding. Our findings reveal that the energy landscape topography determines the thermodynamics, kinetics, and the association mechanism of the binding–folding dynamics. These three aspects are closely related to feasibility, efficiency, and the ways of realizing biomolecular function, respectively. Our results provide a unique way to address the long-standing debate of the “structure–dynamics–function” relationship using landscape topography and establish the connections between recognition landscape theory and experimental measurements. Biomolecular functions are determined by their interactions with other molecules. Biomolecular recognition is often flexible and associated with large conformational changes involving both binding and folding. However, the global and physical understanding for the process is still challenging. Here, we quantified the intrinsic energy landscapes of flexible biomolecular recognition in terms of binding–folding dynamics for 15 homodimers by exploring the underlying density of states, using a structure-based model both with and without considering energetic roughness. By quantifying three individual effective intrinsic energy landscapes (one for interfacial binding, two for monomeric folding), the association mechanisms for flexible recognition of 15 homodimers can be classified into two-state cooperative “coupled binding–folding” and three-state noncooperative “folding prior to binding” scenarios. We found that the association mechanism of flexible biomolecular recognition relies on the interplay between the underlying effective intrinsic binding and folding energy landscapes. By quantifying the whole global intrinsic binding–folding energy landscapes, we found strong correlations between the landscape topography measure Λ (dimensionless ratio of energy gap versus roughness modulated by the configurational entropy) and the ratio of the thermodynamic stable temperature versus trapping temperature, as well as between Λ and binding kinetics. Therefore, the global energy landscape topography determines the binding–folding thermodynamics and kinetics, crucial for the feasibility and efficiency of realizing biomolecular function. We also found “U-shape” temperature-dependent kinetic behavior and a dynamical cross-over temperature for dividing exponential and nonexponential kinetics for two-state homodimers. Our study provides a unique way to bridge the gap between theory and experiments.

[1]  Jin Wang Diffusion and single molecule dynamics on biomolecular interface binding energy landscape , 2006 .

[2]  L. Reymond,et al.  Charge interactions can dominate the dimensions of intrinsically disordered proteins , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis , 1994, Proteins.

[4]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Statistical mechanics of a correlated energy landscape model for protein folding funnels , 1996, cond-mat/9606159.

[5]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. , 1997, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[6]  T. R. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Connections between some kinetic and equilibrium theories of the glass transition. , 1987, Physical review. A, General physics.

[7]  George Stell,et al.  The cooperative nature of hydrophobic forces and protein folding kinetics , 2005 .

[8]  Christopher J. Oldfield,et al.  Intrinsically disordered protein. , 2001, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[9]  Wolynes,et al.  Statistics of kinetic pathways on biased rough energy landscapes with applications to protein folding. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[10]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Capillarity theory for the fly-casting mechanism , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  K. Plaxco,et al.  Non-sequence-specific interactions can account for the compaction of proteins unfolded under "native" conditions. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding , 1999 .

[13]  Caitlin L. Chicoine,et al.  Net charge per residue modulates conformational ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Gilad Haran,et al.  How, when and why proteins collapse: the relation to folding. , 2012, Current opinion in structural biology.

[15]  H. Dyson,et al.  Linking folding and binding. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[16]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[17]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Folding funnels and energy landscapes of larger proteins within the capillarity approximation. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Protein folding kinetics: timescales, pathways and energy landscapes in terms of sequence-dependent properties. , 1996, Folding & design.

[19]  Alexander Schug,et al.  From protein folding to protein function and biomolecular binding by energy landscape theory. , 2010, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[20]  Li Xu,et al.  Optimal specificity and function for flexible biomolecular recognition. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Elizabeth M Meiering,et al.  Conformational stability and folding mechanisms of dimeric proteins. , 2008, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[22]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The experimental survey of protein-folding energy landscapes , 2005, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[24]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Topography of funneled landscapes determines the thermodynamics and kinetics of protein folding , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Christopher J. Oldfield,et al.  Showing your ID: intrinsic disorder as an ID for recognition, regulation and cell signaling , 2005, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[26]  Christopher J. Oldfield,et al.  Intrinsic disorder and functional proteomics. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[27]  B. Derrida Random-energy model: An exactly solvable model of disordered systems , 1981 .

[28]  D. Koshland Application of a Theory of Enzyme Specificity to Protein Synthesis. , 1958, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[30]  Yong Wang,et al.  Multi-Scaled Explorations of Binding-Induced Folding of Intrinsically Disordered Protein Inhibitor IA3 to its Target Enzyme , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[31]  A. Surolia,et al.  Thermal stability and mode of oligomerization of the tetrameric peanut agglutinin: a differential scanning calorimetry study. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[32]  V. Uversky Natively unfolded proteins: A point where biology waits for physics , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[33]  D. Oesterhelt,et al.  Dynamics of different functional parts of bacteriorhodopsin: H-2H labeling and neutron scattering. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Electrostatic effects on funneled landscapes and structural diversity in denatured protein ensembles , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  H Frauenfelder,et al.  Dynamics of ligand binding to myoglobin. , 1975, Biochemistry.

[36]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Fast-folding experiments and the topography of protein folding energy landscapes. , 1996, Chemistry & biology.

[37]  Jeffrey K. Noel,et al.  SMOG@ctbp: simplified deployment of structure-based models in GROMACS , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[38]  Yong Wang,et al.  Importance of Electrostatic Interactions in the Association of Intrinsically Disordered Histone Chaperone Chz1 and Histone H2A.Z-H2B , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[39]  Cecilia Clementi,et al.  Balancing energy and entropy: a minimalist model for the characterization of protein folding landscapes. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  C L Brooks,et al.  Taking a Walk on a Landscape , 2001, Science.

[41]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  KumarShankar,et al.  The weighted histogram analysis method for free-energy calculations on biomolecules. I , 1992 .

[43]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Toward an outline of the topography of a realistic protein-folding funnel. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  E. Fischer Einfluss der Configuration auf die Wirkung der Enzyme , 1894 .

[45]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Mechanism and evolution of protein dimerization , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[46]  K. Neet,et al.  Conformational stability of dimeric proteins: Quantitative studies by equilibrium denaturation , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[47]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding and binding cascades: Dynamic landscapes and population shifts , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[48]  Xiliang Zheng,et al.  Quantifying intrinsic specificity: a potential complement to affinity in drug screening. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[49]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Analysis of ordered and disordered protein complexes reveals structural features discriminating between stable and unstable monomers. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[50]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Protein topology determines binding mechanism. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Protein folding funnels: a kinetic approach to the sequence-structure relationship. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Understanding protein folding with energy landscape theory Part I: Basic concepts , 2002, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[53]  Benjamin A. Shoemaker,et al.  Speeding molecular recognition by using the folding funnel: the fly-casting mechanism. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  R. Swendsen,et al.  THE weighted histogram analysis method for free‐energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method , 1992 .

[55]  Statistics, pathways and dynamics of single molecule protein folding , 2003 .

[56]  P. Wolynes Recent successes of the energy landscape theory of protein folding and function , 2005, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[57]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Intermediates and barrier crossing in a random energy model , 1989 .

[58]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[59]  J. Janin,et al.  Quantifying biological specificity: the statistical mechanics of molecular recognition. , 1996, Proteins.

[60]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  Engineering of stable and fast-folding sequences of model proteins. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The physics and bioinformatics of binding and folding—an energy landscape perspective , 2003, Biopolymers.

[62]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Theory of Protein Folding This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Folding and Binding Edited Basic Concepts Perfect Funnel Landscapes and Common Features of Folding Mechanisms , 2022 .

[63]  T. R. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Stable and metastable states in mean-field Potts and structural glasses. , 1987, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[64]  V. Uversky Intrinsically Disordered Proteins , 2014 .

[65]  Frauenfelder,et al.  Glassy behavior of a protein. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[66]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Kinetic partitioning mechanism as a unifying theme in the folding of biomolecules , 1997, cond-mat/9704067.

[67]  Yong Wang,et al.  Multidomain protein solves the folding problem by multifunnel combined landscape: theoretical investigation of a Y-family DNA polymerase. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[68]  Nicholas P. Schafer,et al.  Predictive energy landscapes for protein–protein association , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[69]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  A survey of flexible protein binding mechanisms and their transition states using native topology based energy landscapes. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[70]  Gennady M Verkhivker,et al.  Energy landscape theory, funnels, specificity, and optimal criterion of biomolecular binding. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[71]  H. Bosshard,et al.  Molecular recognition by induced fit: how fit is the concept? , 2001, News in physiological sciences : an international journal of physiology produced jointly by the International Union of Physiological Sciences and the American Physiological Society.

[72]  K. Dill,et al.  From Levinthal to pathways to funnels , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[73]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Navigating the folding routes , 1995, Science.

[74]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. , 1991, Science.