Evaluating the Environmental Benefits of Median Bus Lanes: Microscopic Simulation Approach

Median bus lanes are an important element of bus rapid transit (BRT) systems, and can improve traffic operations by separating bus traffic from the traffic in general-purpose lanes. Thus, the operation of BRT systems with dedicated bus lanes is expected to reduce energy consumption and produce positive environmental impacts to a substantial degree. This study attempts to quantify the impacts for a corridor in Seoul, South Korea where frequent bus services are provided, using an integrated simulation tool composed of a microscopic traffic model and a vehicle emissions simulator. This approach has rarely been applied for evaluating the environmental benefits of BRT systems. Given a high volume of bus traffic, the simulation results reveal that corridor energy consumption can be reduced by 18.5% and emissions can be reduced by 19.3–31.4%, depending on the pollutant (CO, CO2, PM10, PM2.5, NOx). Vehicles in general-purpose lanes contribute 99.0% of the emissions reductions, with the remaining 1.0% contributed by transit buses. Considering that vehicles in general-purpose lanes represent 94% of corridor traffic, and provide 99.0% of the emission reduction contribution, the simulations suggest that median bus lanes benefit not only the bus operations, but also significantly improve the traffic flow in the general-purpose lanes, contributing to the overall corridor emissions reductions.

[1]  Henry X. Liu,et al.  A calibration procedure for microscopic traffic simulation , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[2]  Randall Guensler,et al.  Comparison of Fuel-Cycle Emissions per Passenger Mile from Multiple Bus and Rail Technologies , 2013 .

[3]  Germà Bel,et al.  Evaluation of the Impact of Bus Rapid Transit on Air Pollution , 2015 .

[4]  Dwayne Anthony Henclewood Real-time estimation of arterial performance measures using a data-driven microscopic traffic simulation technique , 2012 .

[5]  Joonho Ko International comparative study of Seoul BRT system , 2015 .

[6]  Kai Zhang,et al.  Optimizing Traffic Control to Reduce Fuel Consumption and Vehicular Emissions , 2009 .

[7]  Randall Guensler,et al.  Energy Consumption and Emissions Modeling of Individual Vehicles , 2017 .

[8]  Randall Guensler,et al.  Developing Vehicle Classification Inputs for Project-Level MOVES Analysis , 2015 .

[9]  Junyi Zhang,et al.  An empirical analysis of the impact of a bus rapid transit system on the concentration of secondary pollutants in the roadside areas of the TransJakarta corridors , 2011 .

[10]  R. Cervero,et al.  BRT TOD: Leveraging transit oriented development with bus rapid transit investments , 2014 .

[11]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Bus Rapid Transit (BRT): An Efficient and Competitive Mode of Public Transport , 2013 .

[12]  Hu Dong,et al.  Developing Calibration Tools for Microscopic Traffic Simulation Final Report Part II: Calibration Framework and Calibration of Local/Global Driving Behavior and Departure/Route Choice Model Parameters , 2008 .

[13]  Jessica Granell Model year distribution and vehicle technology composition of the onroad fleet as a function of vehicle registration data and site location characteristics , 2002 .

[14]  S. C. Wirasinghe,et al.  Bus rapid transit – a review , 2013 .

[15]  Randall Guensler,et al.  Estimating Project-Level Vehicle Emissions with Vissim and MOVES-Matrix , 2016 .

[16]  John D. Nelson,et al.  Recent Developments in Bus Rapid Transit: A Review of the Literature , 2011 .

[17]  Lei Yu,et al.  Applicability of Traffic Microsimulation Models in Vehicle Emissions Estimates , 2012 .