Measuring Autonomy and Emergence via Granger Causality

Concepts of emergence and autonomy are central to artificial life and related cognitive and behavioral sciences. However, quantitative and easy-to-apply measures of these phenomena are mostly lacking. Here, I describe quantitative and practicable measures for both autonomy and emergence, based on the framework of multivariate autoregression and specifically Granger causality. G-autonomy measures the extent to which the knowing the past of a variable helps predict its future, as compared to predictions based on past states of external (environmental) variables. G-emergence measures the extent to which a process is both dependent upon and autonomous from its underlying causal factors. These measures are validated by application to agent-based models of predation (for autonomy) and flocking (for emergence). In the former, evolutionary adaptation enhances autonomy; the latter model illustrates not only emergence but also downward causation. I end with a discussion of relations among autonomy, emergence, and consciousness.

[1]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[2]  Jonathan D. Cryer,et al.  Time Series Analysis , 1986 .

[3]  A. Seth.  Causal connectivity of evolved neural networks during behavior. , 2005, Network.

[4]  Eckehard Olbrich,et al.  Autonomy: An information theoretic perspective , 2008, Biosyst..

[5]  Jaegwon Kim,et al.  Making Sense of Emergence , 1999 .

[6]  B. Libet.  Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action , 1985, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  C. Moore,et al.  What Is a Macrostate? Subjective Observations and Objective Dynamics , 2003, cond-mat/0303625.

[8]  J. Geweke,et al.  Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback between Multiple Time Series , 1982 .

[9]  Yaneer Bar-Yam,et al.  A mathematical theory of strong emergence using multiscale variety , 2004, Complex..

[10]  M. Bedau,et al.  Weak emergence : Causation and emergence , 1996 .

[11]  C. Granger.  Testing for causality: a personal viewpoint , 1980 .

[12]  M. Bedau.  Weak Emergence * , 1997 .

[13]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  Consciousness and Complexity , 2022 .

[14]  C. Granger.  Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[15]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  G. Edelman.  Naturalizing consciousness: A theoretical framework , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  Mental states as macrostates emerging from brain electrical dynamics. , 2008, Chaos.

[18]  Young,et al.  Inferring statistical complexity. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[19]  Frank Jackson,et al.  In Defense of Explanatory Ecumenism , 1992, Economics and Philosophy.

[20]  Schreiber,et al.  Measuring information transfer , 2000, Physical review letters.

[21]  F. Varela.  Principles of biological autonomy , 1979 .

[22]  Hasok Chang,et al.  Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress , 2004 .

[23]  J. Crutchfield.  The calculi of emergence: computation, dynamics and induction , 1994 .

[24]  Craig W. Reynolds.  Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[25]  K SethAnil.  Measuring autonomy and emergence via granger causality , 2010 .

[26]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Measuring consciousness: relating behavioural and neurophysiological approaches , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  Causal networks in simulated neural systems , 2008, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[28]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition : The Realization of the Living (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Scie , 1980 .

[29]  D. Chalmers.  Strong and Weak Emergence , 2006 .

[30]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  Contextual emergence , 2009, Scholarpedia.

[31]  Mark A. Bedau,et al.  Is Weak Emergence Just in the Mind? , 2008, Minds and Machines.

[32]  Daniel Polani.  Emergence, Intrinsic Structure of Information, and Agenthood , 2010 .

[33]  P. Haggard.  Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  R. McClelland,et al.  The self and its brain. , 1990, The Ulster medical journal.

[35]  B. Rosslenbroich.  The Notion of Progress in Evolutionary Biology – The Unresolved Problem and an Empirical Suggestion , 2006 .

[36]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  Explanatory Correlates of Consciousness: Theoretical and Computational Challenges , 2009, Cognitive Computation.

[37]  C. Broad,et al.  The Mind and Its Place in Nature. , 1928 .

[38]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[39]  Mark A. Bedau,et al.  DOWNWARD CAUSATION AND THE AUTONOMY OF WEAK EMERGENCE , 2010 .

[40]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  A MATLAB toolbox for Granger causal connectivity analysis , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[41]  Functions of consciousness , 2011, Cognitive neuroscience.

[42]  Alvaro Moreno,et al.  The autonomy of biological individuals and artificial models , 2008, Biosyst..

[43]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  Granger causality , 2007, Scholarpedia.

[44]  Y. Tu,et al.  Moving and staying together without a leader , 2003, cond-mat/0401257.

[45]  S. Bressler,et al.  Granger Causality: Basic Theory and Application to Neuroscience , 2006, q-bio/0608035.

[46]  Daniele Marinazzo,et al.  Radial basis function approach to nonlinear Granger causality of time series. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[47]  K. Kendrick,et al.  Partial Granger causality—Eliminating exogenous inputs and latent variables , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.