Evaluating the psychometric properties of the CAHPS Patient-centered Medical Home survey.

OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) survey. METHODS We conducted a field test of the CAHPS PCMH survey with 2740 adults. We collected information by mail (n = 1746), telephone (n = 672), and from the Web (n = 322) from 6 sites of care affiliated with a West Coast staff model health maintenance organization. RESULTS An overall response rate of 37% was obtained. Internal consistency reliability estimates for 7 multi-item scales were as follows: access to care, 5 items, α = 0.79; communication with providers, 6 items, α = 0.93; office staff courtesy and respect, 2 items, α = 0.80; shared decision making about medicines, 3 items, α = 0.67; self-management support, 2 items, α = 0.61; attention to mental health issues, 3 items, α = 0.80; and care coordination, 4 items, α = 0.58. The number of responses needed to get reliable information at the site of care level for the composites was generally acceptable (<300 for 0.70 reliability-level) except for self-management support and shared decision making about medicines. Item-scale correlations provided support for distinct composites except for access to care and shared decision making about medicines, which overlapped with the communication with providers scale. Shared decision making and self-management support were significantly, uniquely associated with the global rating of the provider (dependent variable), along with access and communication in a multiple regression model. CONCLUSIONS This study provides further support for the reliability and validity of the CAHPS PCMH survey, but refinement of the self-management support and shared decision-making scales is needed. The survey can be used to provide information about the performance of different health plans on multiple domains of health care, but future efforts to improve some of the survey items is needed.

[1]  R. Hays,et al.  Patient Reports and Ratings of Individual Physicians: An Evaluation of the DoctorGuide and Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study Provider-Level Surveys , 2003, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[2]  R. Hays,et al.  Psychometric Properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey , 2012, Medical care.

[3]  M. Elliott,et al.  Specialties Differ in Which Aspects of Doctor Communication Predict Overall Physician Ratings , 2014, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[4]  Steven C Martino,et al.  Evaluation of a Care Coordination Measure for the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Medicare Survey , 2014, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[5]  E. L. Clark,et al.  Spearman-Brown formula applied to ratings of personality traits. , 1935 .

[6]  Ron D. Hays,et al.  Assessing quality of life in clinical trials : methods and practice , 2005 .

[7]  Asaf Bitton,et al.  A Nationwide Survey of Patient Centered Medical Home Demonstration Projects , 2010, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[8]  R. Hays,et al.  Patient Reports and Ratings of Individual Physicians , 2003 .

[9]  Steven C Martino,et al.  Evaluating the Content of the Communication Items in the CAHPS® Clinician and Group Survey and Supplemental Items with What High-Performing Physicians Say They Do , 2013, The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.

[10]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[11]  R. Hays,et al.  Development of and Field Test Results for the CAHPS PCMH Survey , 2012, Medical care.

[12]  David J. Woodruff,et al.  Statistical Inference for Coefficient Alpha , 1987 .