RICOPILI: Rapid Imputation for COnsortias PIpeLIne

Motivation Genome-wide association study (GWAS) analyses, at sufficient sample sizes and power, have successfully revealed biological insights for several complex traits. RICOPILI, an open sourced Perl-based pipeline was developed to address the challenges of rapidly processing large scale multi-cohort GWAS studies including quality control, imputation and downstream analyses. The pipeline is computationally efficient with portability to a wide range of high-performance computing (HPC) environments. Summary RICOPILI was created as the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) pipeline for GWAS and has been adopted by other users. The pipeline features i) technical and genomic quality control in case-control and trio cohorts ii) genome-wide phasing and imputation iv) association analysis v) meta-analysis vi) polygenic risk scoring and vii) replication analysis. Notably, a major differentiator from other GWAS pipelines, RICOPILI leverages on automated parallelization and cluster job management approaches for rapid production of imputed genome-wide data. A comprehensive meta-analysis of simulated GWAS data has been incorporated demonstrating each step of the pipeline. This includes all of the associated visualization plots, to allow ease of data interpretation and manuscript preparation. Simulated GWAS datasets are also packaged with the pipeline for user training tutorials and developer work. Availability and Implementation RICOPILI has a flexible architecture to allow for ongoing development and incorporation of newer available algorithms and is adaptable to various HPC environments (QSUB, BSUB, SLURM and others). Specific links for genomic resources are either directly provided in this paper or via tutorials and external links. The central location hosting scripts and tutorials is found at this URL: https://sites.google.com/a/broadinstitute.org/RICOPILI/home Contact sripke@broadinstitute.org Supplementary information Supplementary data are available.

[1]  Patrick F. Sullivan,et al.  Genetic architectures of psychiatric disorders: the emerging picture and its implications , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[2]  Peter Donnelly,et al.  HAPGEN2: simulation of multiple disease SNPs , 2011, Bioinform..

[3]  M. Daly,et al.  LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[4]  Alessandro Bertolino,et al.  Translating genome-wide association findings into new therapeutics for psychiatry , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Todd L Edwards,et al.  Exploring the phenotypic consequences of tissue specific gene expression variation inferred from GWAS summary statistics , 2018, Nature Communications.

[6]  Yun Li,et al.  METAL: fast and efficient meta-analysis of genomewide association scans , 2010, Bioinform..

[7]  O. Delaneau,et al.  A linear complexity phasing method for thousands of genomes , 2011, Nature Methods.

[8]  Manuel A. R. Ferreira,et al.  PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. , 2007, American journal of human genetics.

[9]  P. Visscher,et al.  GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. , 2011, American journal of human genetics.

[10]  J. Marchini,et al.  Fast and accurate genotype imputation in genome-wide association studies through pre-phasing , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[11]  C. Spencer,et al.  Biological Insights From 108 Schizophrenia-Associated Genetic Loci , 2014, Nature.

[12]  Gabor T. Marth,et al.  A global reference for human genetic variation , 2015, Nature.

[13]  D. Reich,et al.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[14]  P. Donnelly,et al.  A Flexible and Accurate Genotype Imputation Method for the Next Generation of Genome-Wide Association Studies , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[15]  Po-Ru Loh,et al.  Fast and accurate long-range phasing in a UK Biobank cohort , 2015, Nature Genetics.

[16]  P. Donnelly,et al.  The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data , 2018, Nature.

[17]  T. Lehtimäki,et al.  Integrative approaches for large-scale transcriptome-wide association studies , 2015, Nature Genetics.

[18]  Alan M. Kwong,et al.  Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods , 2016, Nature Genetics.

[19]  Gerome Breen,et al.  Psychiatric Genomics: An Update and an Agenda , 2017, bioRxiv.

[20]  Alan M. Kwong,et al.  A reference panel of 64,976 haplotypes for genotype imputation , 2015, Nature Genetics.