Deep Learning-Aided Perturbation Model-Based Fiber Nonlinearity Compensation

Fiber nonlinearity effects cap achievable rates and ranges in long-haul optical fiber communication links. Conventional nonlinearity compensation methods, such as perturbation theory-based nonlinearity compensation (PB-NLC), attempt to compensate for the nonlinearity by approximating analytical solutions to the signal propagation over optical fibers. However, their practical usability is limited by model mismatch and the immense computational complexity associated with the analytical computation of perturbation triplets and the nonlinearity distortion field. Recently, machine learning techniques have been used to optimise parameters of PB-based approaches, which traditionally have been determined analytically from physical models. It has been claimed in the literature that the learned PB-NLC approaches have improved performance and/or reduced computational complexity over their non-learned counterparts. In this paper, we first revisit the acclaimed benefits of the learned PB-NLC approaches by carefully carrying out a comprehensive performance-complexity analysis utilizing state-of-the-art complexity reduction methods. Interestingly, our results show that least squares-based PB-NLC with clustering quantization has the best performance-complexity trade-off among the learned PB-NLC approaches. Second, we advance the state-of-the-art of learned PB-NLC by proposing and designing a fully learned structure by adopting the noiseless Manakov equation as the channel propagation model. We apply a bi-directional recurrent neural network for learning perturbation triplets that are alike those obtained from the analytical computation and are used as input features for the neural network to estimate the nonlinearity distortion field. Finally, we demonstrate through numerical simulations that our proposed fully learned approach achieves an improved performance-complexity trade-off compared to the existing learned and non-learned PB-NLC techniques.

[1]  Sunish Kumar Orappanpara Soman,et al.  Learning for Perturbation-Based Fiber Nonlinearity Compensation , 2022, 2022 European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC).

[2]  S. Calabrò,et al.  Nonlinear Equalization for Optical Communications Based on Entropy-Regularized Mean Square Error , 2022, 2022 European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC).

[3]  X. Xin,et al.  Convolutional Neural Network-Aided DP-64 QAM Coherent Optical Communication Systems , 2022, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[4]  Sunish Kumar A tutorial on fiber Kerr nonlinearity effect and its compensation in optical communication systems , 2021, Journal of Optics.

[5]  Nengcheng Chen,et al.  Next-Generation Soil Moisture Sensor Web: High-Density In Situ Observation Over NB-IoT , 2021, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[6]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Ultralow Complexity Long Short-Term Memory Network for Fiber Nonlinearity Mitigation in Coherent Optical Communication Systems , 2021, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[7]  Octavia A. Dobre,et al.  Second-Order Perturbation Theory-Based Digital Predistortion for Fiber Nonlinearity Compensation , 2021, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[8]  O. S. Sunish Kumar,et al.  Deep Neural Network Assisted Second-Order Perturbation-Based Nonlinearity Compensation , 2021, OSA Advanced Photonics Congress 2021.

[9]  Dimitris Bertsimas,et al.  Machine Learning for Real-Time Heart Disease Prediction , 2021, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[10]  S. Hu,et al.  Distributed Machine Learning for Wireless Communication Networks: Techniques, Architectures, and Applications , 2020, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[11]  Alex Alvarado,et al.  Model-Based Machine Learning for Joint Digital Backpropagation and PMD Compensation , 2020, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[12]  Sergei K. Turitsyn,et al.  Compensation of Nonlinear Impairments Using Inverse Perturbation Theory With Reduced Complexity , 2020, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[13]  Michael Carbin,et al.  Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network Pruning , 2020, ICLR.

[14]  Tu T. Nguyen,et al.  Nonlinear Tolerance Enhancement Based on Perturbation Theory for Optical Phase Conjugation Systems , 2020, 2020 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[15]  Alex Alvarado,et al.  Regular perturbation on the group-velocity dispersion parameter for nonlinear fibre-optical communications , 2020, Nature Communications.

[16]  Alex Alvarado,et al.  Model-Based Machine Learning for Joint Digital Backpropagation and PMD Compensation , 2020, 2020 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[17]  O. Dobre,et al.  Enhanced Regular Perturbation-Based Nonlinearity Compensation Technique for Optical Transmission Systems , 2019, IEEE Photonics Journal.

[18]  Vijay Vusirikala,et al.  Field and lab experimental demonstration of nonlinear impairment compensation using neural networks , 2019, Nature Communications.

[19]  Ziad A. El-Sahn,et al.  Reduced Complexity Nonlinearity Compensation via Principal Component Analysis and Deep Neural Networks , 2019, 2019 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[20]  Olga Vassilieva,et al.  Enabling Technologies for Fiber Nonlinearity Mitigation in High Capacity Transmission Systems , 2019, 2018 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exposition (OFC).

[21]  Colja Schubert,et al.  Improved Perturbation-Based Fiber Nonlinearity Compensation , 2018, 2018 European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC).

[22]  Per Larsson-Edefors,et al.  ASIC Implementation of Time-Domain Digital Backpropagation with Deep-Learned Chromatic Dispersion Filters , 2018, 2018 European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC).

[23]  O. Vassilieva,et al.  Enabling Technologies for Fiber Nonlinearity Mitigation in High Capacity Transmission Systems , 2018, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[24]  Henry D. Pfister,et al.  Nonlinear Interference Mitigation via Deep Neural Networks , 2017, 2018 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exposition (OFC).

[25]  Peter J. Winzer,et al.  From Scaling Disparities to Integrated Parallelism: A Decathlon for a Decade , 2017, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[26]  Peter J. Winzer,et al.  Nonlinear Interference Mitigation: Methods and Potential Gain , 2017, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[27]  S. K. Wilson,et al.  A spectrally-efficient linear polarization coding scheme for fiber nonlinearity compensation in CO-OFDM systems , 2017, OPTO.

[28]  Octavia A. Dobre,et al.  A Survey on Fiber Nonlinearity Compensation for 400 Gb/s and Beyond Optical Communication Systems , 2017, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[29]  D. V. Plant,et al.  Adaptive Optimization of Quantized Perturbation Coefficients for Fiber Nonlinearity Compensation , 2016, IEEE Photonics Journal.

[30]  Danish Rafique,et al.  Fiber Nonlinearity Compensation: Commercial Applications and Complexity Analysis , 2016, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[31]  Takeshi Hoshida,et al.  Analytical Intrachannel Nonlinear Models to Predict the Nonlinear Noise Waveform , 2015, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[32]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling , 2014, ArXiv.

[33]  Xiaojun Liang,et al.  Multi-stage perturbation theory for compensating intra-channel nonlinear impairments in fiber-optic links. , 2014, Optics express.

[34]  Yuichi Akiyama,et al.  Complexity-reduced digital nonlinear compensation for coherent optical system , 2013, Photonics West - Optoelectronic Materials and Devices.

[35]  J. C. Rasmussen,et al.  Pre-distortion method for intra-channel nonlinearity compensation with phase-rotated perturbation term , 2012, OFC/NFOEC.

[36]  Zhenning Tao,et al.  Multiplier-Free Intrachannel Nonlinearity Compensating Algorithm Operating at Symbol Rate , 2011, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[37]  P. Winzer,et al.  Capacity Limits of Optical Fiber Networks , 2010, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[38]  J. Kahn,et al.  Compensation of Dispersion and Nonlinear Impairments Using Digital Backpropagation , 2008, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[39]  Alberto Bononi,et al.  The RP method: a new tool for the iterative solution of the nonlinear Schrodinger equation , 2002 .

[40]  A. Mecozzi,et al.  Analysis of intrachannel nonlinear effects in highly dispersed optical pulse transmission , 2000, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[41]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult , 1994, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[42]  Abhinav Sharma,et al.  Machine Learning Applications for Precision Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review , 2021, IEEE Access.

[43]  Sheping Shi,et al.  Low-Complexity Fiber Nonlinearity Impairments Compensation Enabled by Simple Recurrent Neural Network With Time Memory , 2020, IEEE Access.

[44]  F. Kschischang,et al.  Digital signal processing for fiber nonlinearities [Invited]. , 2017, Optics express.

[45]  Scott S.-H. Yam,et al.  Reducing the Complexity of Nonlinearity Pre-compensation Using Symmetric EDC and Pulse Shaping , 2013 .

[46]  T. Tanimura,et al.  Improved Analytical Model for Intra-Channel Nonlinear Distortion by Relaxing the Lossless Assumption , 2013 .