Why we need to focus on developing ethical, responsible, and trustworthy artificial intelligence approaches for environmental science

Abstract Given the growing use of Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods across all aspects of environmental sciences, it is imperative that we initiate a discussion about the ethical and responsible use of AI. In fact, much can be learned from other domains where AI was introduced, often with the best of intentions, yet often led to unintended societal consequences, such as hard coding racial bias in the criminal justice system or increasing economic inequality through the financial system. A common misconception is that the environmental sciences are immune to such unintended consequences when AI is being used, as most data come from observations, and AI algorithms are based on mathematical formulas, which are often seen as objective. In this article, we argue the opposite can be the case. Using specific examples, we demonstrate many ways in which the use of AI can introduce similar consequences in the environmental sciences. This article will stimulate discussion and research efforts in this direction. As a community, we should avoid repeating any foreseeable mistakes made in other domains through the introduction of AI. In fact, with proper precautions, AI can be a great tool to help reduce climate and environmental injustice. We primarily focus on weather and climate examples but the conclusions apply broadly across the environmental sciences.

[1]  Lauren F. Klein,et al.  Data Feminism , 2022, The AAG Review of Books.

[2]  Hao Zhou,et al.  A Survey on Green Deep Learning , 2021, ArXiv.

[3]  I. Ebert‐Uphoff,et al.  Using deep learning to nowcast the spatial coverage of convection from Himawari-8 satellite data , 2021, Monthly Weather Review.

[4]  E. Barnes,et al.  Adding Uncertainty to Neural Network Regression Tasks in the Geosciences , 2021, 2109.07250.

[5]  R. Schumacher,et al.  Forecasting excessive rainfall with random forests and a deterministic convection-allowing model , 2021, Weather and forecasting.

[6]  Gregory R. Herman,et al.  From Random Forests to Flood Forecasts: A Research to Operations Success Story , 2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[7]  Joseph C. Hardin,et al.  Inpainting Radar Missing Data Regions with Deep Learning , 2021, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[8]  P. Kinney,et al.  On the distribution of low-cost PM2.5 sensors in the US: demographic and air quality associations , 2021, Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology.

[9]  Raia Hadsell,et al.  Skilful precipitation nowcasting using deep generative models of radar , 2021, Nature.

[10]  Daniel J. Crichton,et al.  Science Storms the Cloud , 2021, AGU Advances.

[11]  Aaron Roth,et al.  The Ethical Algorithm: The Science of Socially Aware Algorithm Design , 2021, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith.

[12]  G. McFarquhar,et al.  A Dual-Frequency Radar Retrieval of Two Parameters of the Snowfall Particle Size Distribution Using a Neural Network , 2021, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology.

[13]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  AI for climate: freedom, justice, and other ethical and political challenges , 2020, AI and Ethics.

[14]  Neelke Doorn,et al.  Artificial intelligence in the water domain: Opportunities for responsible use , 2020, Science of The Total Environment.

[15]  Steven Reece,et al.  Using very high-resolution satellite imagery and deep learning to detect and count African elephants in heterogeneous landscapes , 2020, bioRxiv.

[16]  Amy McGovern,et al.  Deep Learning on Three-Dimensional Multiscale Data for Next-Hour Tornado Prediction , 2020, Monthly Weather Review.

[17]  Imme Ebert-Uphoff,et al.  Evaluation, Tuning and Interpretation of Neural Networks for Meteorological Applications , 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[18]  N. Pidgeon Engaging publics about environmental and technology risks: frames, values and deliberation , 2020 .

[19]  Steven D. Miller,et al.  Development and Interpretation of a Neural Network-Based Synthetic Radar Reflectivity Estimator Using GOES-R Satellite Observations , 2020, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology.

[20]  S. Merz Race after technology. Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code , 2020, Ethnic and Racial Studies.

[21]  Andrew Chadwick,et al.  Deepfakes and Disinformation: Exploring the Impact of Synthetic Political Video on Deception, Uncertainty, and Trust in News , 2020, Social Media + Society.

[22]  K. Cartier Keeping Indigenous Science Knowledge out of a Colonial Mold , 2019 .

[23]  Yuriy Brun,et al.  Preventing undesirable behavior of intelligent machines , 2019, Science.

[24]  Subhransu Maji,et al.  MistNet: Measuring historical bird migration in the US using archived weather radar data and convolutional neural networks , 2019, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[25]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning , 2019, ACM Comput. Surv..

[26]  Noah A. Smith,et al.  Green AI , 2019, 1907.10597.

[27]  Ruha Benjamin Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code , 2019, Social Forces.

[28]  Shikha Verma,et al.  Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy , 2019, Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers.

[29]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  Establishing the rules for building trustworthy AI , 2019, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[30]  Division on Earth,et al.  Reproducibility and Replicability in Science , 2019 .

[31]  E. M. Murillo,et al.  Severe Hail Fall and Hailstorm Detection Using Remote Sensing Observations. , 2019, Journal of applied meteorology and climatology.

[32]  D. Gagne,et al.  Machine Learning for Stochastic Parameterization: Generative Adversarial Networks in the Lorenz '96 Model , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[33]  Joachim Denzler,et al.  Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science , 2019, Nature.

[34]  Corey K. Potvin,et al.  A Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling Framework for Correcting Reporting Bias in the U.S. Tornado Database , 2018, Weather and Forecasting.

[35]  Amy McGovern,et al.  Making the Black Box More Transparent: Understanding the Physical Implications of Machine Learning , 2019, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[36]  Cynthia Rudin,et al.  Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead , 2018, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[37]  Saeed Mahloujifar,et al.  Adversarial Risk and Robustness: General Definitions and Implications for the Uniform Distribution , 2018, NeurIPS.

[38]  Roger Edwards,et al.  Reliability and Climatological Impacts of Convective Wind Estimations , 2018, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology.

[39]  Patrick D. McDaniel,et al.  Making machine learning robust against adversarial inputs , 2018, Commun. ACM.

[40]  W. Haselager,et al.  Explanation Methods in Deep Learning: Users, Values, Concerns and Challenges , 2018, ArXiv.

[41]  Amy McGovern,et al.  Automated detection of bird roosts using NEXRAD radar data and Convolutional Neural Networks , 2018, Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation.

[42]  Vipin Kumar,et al.  Mapping Burned Areas in Tropical Forests Using a Novel Machine Learning Framework , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[43]  Tony Doyle,et al.  Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy , 2017, Inf. Soc..

[44]  Sue Ellen Haupt,et al.  Evaluation of statistical learning configurations for gridded solar irradiance forecasting , 2017 .

[45]  Scott Curtis,et al.  Weather on the Go: An Assessment of Smartphone Mobile Weather Application Use among College Students , 2017, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[46]  Zhe Jiang,et al.  Monitoring Land-Cover Changes: A Machine-Learning Perspective , 2016, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine.

[47]  Suzanne A. Pierce,et al.  Modelling with stakeholders e Next generation , 2015 .

[48]  Michael K. Tippett,et al.  The Characteristics of United States Hail Reports: 1955-2014 , 2015, E-Journal of Severe Storms Meteorology.

[49]  Syamsidik,et al.  Process for integrating local and indigenous knowledge with science for hydro-meteorological disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation in coastal and small island communities , 2014 .

[50]  M. Oppenheimer,et al.  The ethics of scientific communication under uncertainty , 2014 .

[51]  Aaron C. Courville,et al.  Generative adversarial networks , 2014, Commun. ACM.

[52]  Ling Huang,et al.  Classifier Evasion: Models and Open Problems , 2010, PSDML.

[53]  Jason Chilvers,et al.  Deliberative and Participatory Approaches in Environmental Geography , 2009 .

[54]  James W. Marquart,et al.  beyond mother nature: contractor fraud in the wake of natural disasters , 2005 .

[55]  Maria Carmen Lemos,et al.  The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments , 2003 .

[56]  T. Webler,et al.  Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation , 2000 .

[57]  M. Morris Understanding Risk - Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1997 .

[58]  Marko Orescanin,et al.  Bayesian Deep Learning for Passive Microwave Precipitation Type Detection , 2022, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[59]  Wojciech Samek,et al.  Explainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining and Visualizing Deep Learning , 2019, Explainable AI.

[60]  T. Webler,et al.  Fairness and competence in citizen participation : evaluating models for environmental discourse , 1995 .