Comparative performance of alternative humanitarian logistic structures after the Port-au-Prince earthquake: ACEs, PIEs, and CANs

The paper analyzes the performance of different post-disaster humanitarian logistic structures that arose in response to the Port-au-Prince earthquake of January 12th, 2010. Based on field work conducted by the authors, the paper defines a typology of structures; assesses their relative performance in terms of delivering relief aid; and identifies the causes that explain the differences between them. Three structures are defined for comparative purposes: Agency Centric Efforts (ACEs), Partially Integrated Efforts (PIEs), and Collaborative Aid Networks (CANs). These structures differ to the extent to which they are integrated with the local social networks during the relief effort. Representative examples were analyzed to illustrate their inherent strengths and weaknesses, and reach conclusions of general applicability. The authors strengthen the analyses with discussions of “comparables,” i.e., other cases not fully discussed in the paper that shed additional light onto the performance of the structures.

[1]  James M. Kendra,et al.  RECONSIDERING CONVERGENCE AND CONVERGER LEGITIMACY IN RESPONSE TO THE WORLD TRADE CENTER DISASTER , 2003 .

[2]  L. V. Wassenhove,et al.  On the unique features of post‐disaster humanitarian logistics , 2012 .

[3]  E. Shils,et al.  The Methodology Of The Social Sciences , 1949 .

[4]  J. Holguín-Veras,et al.  The Tohoku Disasters: Preliminary Findings Concerning the Post Disaster Humanitarian Logistics Response , 2012 .

[5]  E. L. Quarantelli,et al.  The Characteristics of Catastrophes and Their Social Evolution: An Exploratory Analysis of Implications for Crisis Policies and Emergency Management Procedures , 2008 .

[6]  George Thomas Kurian Church of the Nazarene , 2011 .

[7]  Louise K. Comfort,et al.  Designing resilience : preparing for extreme events , 2010 .

[8]  Lee Clarke,et al.  Terrorism and disaster : new threats, new ideas , 2003 .

[9]  José Holguín-Veras,et al.  Immediate Resource Requirements after Hurricane Katrina , 2012 .

[10]  Enrico L Quarantelli,et al.  Some Needed Cross-Cultural Studies of Disaster Behavior , 1976 .

[11]  Stephanie E. Chang,et al.  Measuring post-disaster transportation system performance: the 1995 Kobe earthquake in comparative perspective , 2001 .

[12]  Tricia Wachtendorf,et al.  Emergency Logistics Issues Affecting the Response to Katrina , 2007 .

[13]  E. Quarantelli,et al.  A Perspective on Disaster Planning , 1972 .

[14]  Tricia Wachtendorf,et al.  Catastrophe Characteristics and their Impact on Critical Supply Chains: Problematizing Materiel Convergence and Management Following Hurricane Katrina , 2013 .

[15]  Ali Haghani,et al.  Formulation and solution of a multi-commodity, multi-modal network flow model for disaster relief operations , 1996 .

[16]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Performance of Buildings , 2000 .

[17]  David F. Gillespie,et al.  Effects of Organizational Type and Localism on Volunteerism and Resource Sharing During Disasters , 1998 .

[18]  Neil R Britton,et al.  Organized Behavior in Disaster: A Review Essay , 1988, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[19]  Marc L. Levitan,et al.  National Review of Hurricane Evacuation Plans and Policies , 2001 .

[20]  José Holguín-Veras,et al.  The Tohoku disasters: Chief lessons concerning the post disaster humanitarian logistics response and policy implications , 2014 .