A Technology Acceptance Model For Unit Guide Information Systems

Curriculum mapping is an important task in implementing, embedding and monitoring the knowledge, skills and attributes that graduates must acquire in their program of study. Curriculum mapping ensures correspondence between learning outcomes, learning activities and assessments. To aid in performing this complex task, many higher education institutions are using unit/study guide tools or curriculum mapping tools. These tools may be known under different names in different institutions but we will refer to these tools as unit guide information systems. To evaluate the utilisation and acceptance of these tools, this research-in-progress paper draws on an extensive body of literature related to technology acceptance that includes social cognitive theory and model of PC utilization to explain the influence of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Our research extends the technology acceptance model by incorporating the external variables of self-efficacy, anxiety and social influence. The results are expected to indicate which of the external factors are most important in predicting and explaining attitude and intention to use unit guide information systems.

[1]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. , 1982 .

[2]  Yan Xu,et al.  An Enhanced Technology Acceptance Model for Web-Based Learning , 2004, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[3]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[4]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Development and Test of a Theory of Technological Learning and Usage , 1992 .

[5]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[6]  Charles D. Barrett Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[7]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[8]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[9]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-Efficacy: Toward Clarification of the Construct and an Integrative Framework for Research , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[11]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  User acceptance of information technology , 2001 .

[12]  Ercan Kiraz,et al.  The Relationship between Educational Ideologies and Technology Acceptance in Pre-service Teachers , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[13]  Nils Urbach,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling in Information Systems Research Using Partial Least Squares , 2010 .

[14]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  User acceptance of Intelligence and Security Informatics technology: A study of COPLINK , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  Peter Meso,et al.  An Exploratory Assessment of the Pedagogical Effectiveness of a Systems Development Environment , 2005, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[16]  William R. King,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[17]  D. Bradley,et al.  Review of Australian Higher Education: final report , 2008 .

[18]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[19]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Examining a Model of Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: An Exploratory Study , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Jennifer Sumsion,et al.  Identifying generic skills through curriculum mapping: a critical evaluation , 2004 .

[21]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[22]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[23]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Dead Or Alive? The Development, Trajectory And Future Of Technology Adoption Research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[26]  Yuan Gao,et al.  Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to Educational Hypermedia: A Field Study , 2005 .

[27]  Raafat George Saadé,et al.  Dimensions of Perceived Usefulness: Toward Enhanced Assessment. , 2007 .

[28]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[29]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring the Optimal Experience of the eLearning Environment , 2007 .

[30]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[31]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Nancy C Davenport,et al.  A Step-by-Step Approach to Curriculum Review , 2009, Nurse educator.

[33]  Raafat George Saadé,et al.  The Emotional State of Technology Acceptance , 2006 .

[34]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[35]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .