Technology Entry in the Presence of Patent Thickets

We analyze the effect of patent thickets on entry into technology areas by firms in the UK. We present a model that describes incentives to enter technology areas characterized by varying technological opportunity, complexity, and the potential for hold-up due to the presence of patent thickets. We show empirically that our measure of patent thickets is associated with a reduction of first time patenting in a given technology area controlling for the level of technological complexity and opportunity. Technological areas characterized by more technological complexity and opportunity, in contrast, see more entry. Our evidence indicates that patent thickets raise entry costs, which leads to less entry into technologies regardless of a firm’s size.

[1]  Christian Helmers,et al.  Intellectual Property at the Firm-Level in the UK: The Oxford Firm-Level Intellectual Property Database , 2011 .

[2]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Innovation and its Discontents , 2004 .

[3]  J. Tirole,et al.  Efficient Patent Pools , 2002 .

[4]  James Bessen,et al.  The Direct Costs from NPE Disputes , 2012 .

[5]  Karin Hoisl,et al.  The Strategic Use of Patents and Its Implications for Enterprise and Competition Policies, Report ENTR/05/82 for DG Enterprise, European Commission , 2007 .

[6]  X. Vives.  Complementarities and Games: New Developments , 2004 .

[7]  Markus Reitzig,et al.  On sharks, trolls, and their patent prey—Unrealistic damage awards and firms’ strategies of “being infringed” , 2007 .

[8]  J. Tirole,et al.  The Design of Patent Pools: The Determinants of Licensing Rules , 2008 .

[9]  Georg von Graevenitz,et al.  Incidence and Growth of Patent Thickets: The Impact of Technological Opportunities and Complexity , 2008 .

[10]  J. Henkel,et al.  Patent trolls on markets for technology – An empirical analysis of NPEs’ patent acquisitions , 2012 .

[11]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Our Divided Patent System , 2014 .

[12]  Georg von Graevenitz,et al.  A Study of Patent Thickets , 2014, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[13]  Dietmar Harhoff.  Patent Quantity and Quality in Europe – Trends and Policy Implications , 2006 .

[14]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Post Grant Review Systems at the U.S. Patent Office – Design Parameters and Expected Impact , 2004 .

[15]  Iain M. Cockburn,et al.  Entry and Patenting in the Software Industry , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[16]  K. Suzumura,et al.  Entry Barriers and Economic Welfare , 1987 .

[17]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry , 2005 .

[18]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U , 2001 .

[19]  James E. Bessen,et al.  Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk , 2008 .

[20]  Chaim Fershtman,et al.  Cross licensing of complementary technologies , 1992 .

[21]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Patent Holdup, the ITC, and the Public Interest , 2012 .

[22]  Austan Goolsbee,et al.  Does Government R&D Policy Mainly Benefit Scientists and Engineers? , 1998 .

[23]  Steven T. Berry.  Estimation of a Model of Entry in the Airline Industry , 1992 .

[24]  Eric Maskin,et al.  Sequential Innovation, Patents, and Imitation , 2000 .

[25]  Brian D. Wright,et al.  Why weak patents? Testing the examiner ignorance hypothesis , 2017 .

[26]  Bronwyn H Hall.  Exploring the Patent Explosion , 2004, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[27]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  The Importance (or Not) of Patents to UK Firms , 2013 .

[28]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility, Multi-faceted Job-Products, and Employee Outcomes , 2013, Journal of Business Ethics.

[29]  Travis J. Lybbert,et al.  Getting Patents and Economic Data to Speak to Each Other: An 'Algorithmic Links with Probabilities' Approach for Joint Analyses of Patenting and Economic Activity , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[30]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Who Does R&D and Who Patents? , 1982 .

[31]  Robert P. Merges,et al.  Incentives to Challenge and Defend Patents: Why Litigation Won't Reliably Fix Patent Office Errors and Why Administrative Patent Review Might Help , 2004 .

[32]  Carl Shapiro,et al.  Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting , 2000, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[33]  W. Myers,et al.  Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact , 2013 .

[34]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Entry and Competition in Concentrated Markets , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.

[35]  C. Fink,et al.  Exploring the worldwide patent surge , 2016, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[36]  R. Posner.  The Federal Trade Commission , 1969 .

[37]  James Bessen,et al.  The Private and Social Costs of Patent Trolls , 2011 .

[38]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Determinants of Opposition against EPO Patent Grants – The Case of Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals ∗ , 2002 .

[39]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  How to measure patent thickets—A novel approach , 2011 .

[40]  Jeroen G. Kuilman,et al.  Industrial and Corporate Change , 2013 .

[41]  J. Geanakoplos,et al.  Free Entry and Social Inefficiency , 1986 .

[42]  James Bessen,et al.  The Patent Litigation Explosion , 2005 .

[43]  Rabah Amir,et al.  On the Effects of Entry in Cournot Markets , 2000 .

[44]  D. Teece,et al.  Managing Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Cross-Licensing in Semiconductors and Electronics , 1997 .

[45]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 2—Spring 2005—Pages 75–98 Probabilistic Patents , 2022 .

[46]  Mark Schankerman,et al.  Screening for Patent Quality: Examination, Fees, and the Courts , 2016 .

[47]  J. Tirole,et al.  Standard-Essential Patents , 2013, Journal of Political Economy.

[48]  Feng Zhu,et al.  The Impact of Patent Wars on Firm Strategy: Evidence from the Global Smartphone Industry , 2016, Organ. Sci..

[49]  Kai A. Konrad,et al.  Fragmented Property Rights and Incentives for R&D , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[50]  Megan J. MacGarvie,et al.  Patent Thickets, Licensing and Innovative Performance , 2010 .

[51]  Deepak Somaya.  Strategic determinants of decisions not to settle patent litigation , 2003 .

[52]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[53]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking , 2006 .

[54]  Joshua Lerner,et al.  Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It , 2011 .

[55]  Josh Lerner,et al.  Patenting in the Shadow of Competitors , 1995, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[56]  R. Henderson.  Underinvestment and Incompetence as Responses to Radical Innovation: Evidence From the Photolithographic Alignment Equipment Industry , 2015 .

[57]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis.  Don't Fence Me in: Fragmented Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisition Strategies of Firms , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[58]  John R. Allison,et al.  How Courts Adjudicate Patent Definiteness and Disclosure , 2015 .

[59]  Christina Mulligan,et al.  Scaling the Patent System , 2012 .

[60]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Fence Posts or Sign Posts: Rethinking Patent Claim Construction , 2009 .

[61]  Carl Shapiro,et al.  How Strong Are Weak Patents , 2008 .

[62]  Amol M. Joshi,et al.  When do strategic alliances inhibit innovation by firms? Evidence from patent pools in the global optical disc industry , 2011 .