The strategies to regulate and to modulate the propulsive forces during gait initiation in lower limb amputees

We used the framework of motor program adaptability to examine how unilateral above-knee (AK) or below-knee (BK) amputee subjects organize the global and local biomechanical processes of generation of the propulsive forces during gait initiation to overcome the segmental and neuro-muscular asymmetry. The organization of the global biomechanical process refers to the kinematics behavior of the couple center of foot pressure (CoP) and center of mass (CoM); the organization of the local biomechanical process refers to the propulsive forces generated by the prosthetic or intact limb during the anticipatory postural adjustment phase and the step execution phase. Specifically, we examined: i) the strategy to regulate the progression velocity, i.e., to maintain it comparably when the leading limb changed from the prosthetic limb to the intact limb; and ii) the strategy to modulate the progression velocity, i.e., to increase it when gait was initiated with the prosthetic limb vs. intact limb. The kinematics of the CoM and CoP in the amputees showed the same global biomechanical organization that is typically observed in able-bodied subjects, i.e., the production of the forward disequilibrium torque was obtained by a backward shift of the CoP, followed by a forward acceleration of the CoM. However, gait initiation was achieved by using a different local strategy depending on which limb was used to initiate the step. For the regulation of the CoM progression velocity, when the gait was initiated with the intact limb, the slope of the progression velocity during the anticipatory postural adjustment phase (APA) was steeper and lasted longer, the step execution duration was shorter, and the variation of the CoM speed was lower. In other words, to regulate the speed of progression, the amputee subjects controlled the spatial and temporal parameters of the propulsive forces. In the modulation of the CoM progression velocity, when the gait was initiated with the intact limb, the amputees controlled only the intensity of the propulsive forces during both the APA and step execution phases. In contrast, when the gait was initiated with the prosthetic limb, the modulation resulted mainly from the propulsive forces generated during the step execution phase. These different strategies are discussed in terms of the subject’s capacity to adapt the motor program for gait initiation to new constraints.

[1]  K H Mauritz,et al.  Asymmetry of gait initiation in hemiparetic stroke subjects. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  S. Bouisset,et al.  A sequence of postural movements precedes voluntary movement , 1981, Neuroscience Letters.

[3]  S. Bennett,et al.  Postural Sway and Active Balance Performance in Highly Active Lower-Limb Amputees , 2002, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[4]  Y Brenière,et al.  Are dynamic phenomena prior to stepping essential to walking? , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[5]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  The role of ankle plantar flexor muscle work during walking. , 1998, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[6]  Gait initiation and impairments of ground reaction forces as illustrated in old age by `La marche à petits pas' , 1997, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  G. Cavagna,et al.  Mechanical work in terrestrial locomotion: two basic mechanisms for minimizing energy expenditure. , 1977, The American journal of physiology.

[8]  Belen'kiĭ Ve,et al.  Control elements of voluntary movements , 1967 .

[9]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Effect of lower limb on body propulsion. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  M. Do,et al.  When and how does steady state gait movement induced from upright posture begin? , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  P. Thoumie,et al.  Changes in motor activity and biomechanics during balance recovery following cutaneous and muscular deafferentation , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  M. Whittle,et al.  Initiation of gait in normal subjects: a preliminary study. , 1990, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[13]  Régine Roll,et al.  From balance regulation to body orientation: two goals for muscle proprioceptive information processing? , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Afferent feedback in the control of human gait. , 2002, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[15]  D. Winter,et al.  Assessment of balance control in humans. , 1990, Medical progress through technology.

[16]  R. Lepers,et al.  The role of anticipatory postural adjustments and gravity in gait initiation , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  T Yamashita,et al.  Moving patterns of point of application of vertical resultant force during level walking. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Y. Brenière Why we walk the way we do. , 1996, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  R. Mann,et al.  The initiation of gait. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  Endre E. Kadar,et al.  Drifting towards a diffuse control model of exploratory motor learning: A comparison of global and within-trial performance measures , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Control of reactive balance adjustments in perturbed human walking: roles of proximal and distal postural muscle activity , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Identifying the control structure of multijoint coordination during pistol shooting , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  P. Crenna,et al.  A motor programme for the initiation of forward‐oriented movements in humans. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  Yvon Brenière,et al.  Organization of local anticipatory movements in single step initiation , 1994 .

[25]  M. Do,et al.  Are stance ankle plantar flexor muscles necessary to generate propulsive force during human gait initiation? , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[26]  B. E. Maki,et al.  The role of plantar cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the control of compensatory stepping reactions evoked by unpredictable, multi-directional perturbation , 2000, Brain Research.

[27]  C A McGibbon,et al.  Age-related changes in lower trunk coordination and energy transfer during gait. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  C. Ekdahl,et al.  Standing balance in trans-tibial amputees following vascular disease or trauma: A comparative study with healthy subjects , 1994, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[29]  J. Massion,et al.  Asymmetry of gait initiation in patients with unilateral knee arthritis. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  M. Latash There is no motor redundancy in human movements. There is motor abundance. , 2000, Motor control.

[31]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  Effect of prosthetic mass on swing phase work during above-knee amputee ambulation. , 1997, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[32]  A. Thorstensson,et al.  Trunk movements in human locomotion. , 1984, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[33]  F. Horak,et al.  Step initiation in Parkinson's disease: Influence of levodopa and external sensory triggers , 1997, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[34]  E. Isakov,et al.  Transtibial amputee gait: Timedistance parameters and EMG activity , 2000, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[35]  M. Do,et al.  In a complex sequential movement, what component of the motor program is improved with intensive practice, sequence timing or ensemble motor learning? , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  J. Hamill,et al.  The swing phase of human walking is not a passive movement. , 2000, Motor control.

[37]  J P Roll,et al.  Foot sole and ankle muscle inputs contribute jointly to human erect posture regulation , 2001, The Journal of physiology.