Medical Imaging Informatics in Nuclear Medicine

Medical imaging informatics is gaining importance in medicine both in clinical practice and in scientific research. Besides radiology, nuclear medicine is also a major stakeholder in medical imaging informatics because of the variety of available imaging modalities and the imaging-oriented operation of this specialization. The amount of data produced by imaging modalities and other diagnostic devices per exam is growing steadily together with the number of exams performed, resulting in a data explosion that provides major opportunities for data analytics and data mining in big data projects. However, it can also fuse problems in storage, distribution, review, and interpretation of the enormous amounts of clinical (image) data while maintaining high-quality patient care. To tackle these problems, standardization, structuring, and automation are crucial. As one of the major producers of medical imaging data, nuclear medicine should stay at the forefront of these developments.

[1]  Yung-Sheng Chen,et al.  A Set of Image Processing Algorithms for Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Nuclear Medicine Whole Body Bone Scan Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[2]  Jonathan H Sunshine,et al.  How widely is computer-aided detection used in screening and diagnostic mammography? , 2010, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[3]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Sliced alternating DICOM series: convenient visualisation of image fusion on PACS , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[4]  E. Somer PACS man: questioning nuclear medicine and PET integration. , 2006, Nuclear medicine communications.

[5]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. , 2002, Circulation.

[6]  L. Edenbrandt,et al.  Improved Classifications of Planar Whole-Body Bone Scans Using a Computer-Assisted Diagnosis System: A Multicenter, Multiple-Reader, Multiple-Case Study , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  Ilan Tal,et al.  Shareware program for nuclear medicine and PET/CT PACS display and processing. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Bao H. Do,et al.  Automatic Retrieval of Bone Fracture Knowledge Using Natural Language Processing , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[9]  Monique W. M. Jaspers,et al.  A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: Methodological aspects and empirical evidence , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[10]  David Dagan Feng,et al.  A web-based image viewer for multiple PET-CT follow-up studies , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  Umit Topaloglu,et al.  EIR: Enterprise imaging repository, an alternative imaging archiving and communication system , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Integrating PET and CT information to improve diagnostic accuracy for lung nodules: A semiautomatic computer-aided method. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  P. Parizel,et al.  The radiology report as seen by radiologists and referring clinicians: results of the COVER and ROVER surveys. , 2011, Radiology.

[14]  Norberto F. Ezquerra,et al.  PERFEX: An expert system for interpreting 3D myocardial perfusion , 1993 .

[15]  Benjamin Littenberg,et al.  Cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation. , 2009, Radiology.

[16]  S. Wildermuth,et al.  Evaluation of radiological workstations and web-browser-based image distribution clients for a PACS project in hands-on workshops , 2004, European Radiology.

[17]  Andrea Esuli,et al.  An enhanced CRFs-based system for information extraction from radiology reports , 2013, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[18]  Andrew Todd-Pokropek,et al.  Procedure guideline for telenuclear medicine 1.0. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  Gilbert Cockton,et al.  Inspection-based evaluations , 2002 .

[20]  Oscar Mauricio Serrano Jaimes,et al.  EVALUACION DE LA USABILIDAD EN SITIOS WEB, BASADA EN EL ESTANDAR ISO 9241-11 (International Standard (1998) Ergonomic requirements For office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Parts II: Guidance on usability , 2012 .

[21]  A Todd-Pokropek,et al.  A file format for the exchange of nuclear medicine image data: a specification of Interfile version 3.3. , 1992, Nuclear medicine communications.

[22]  Bruce I. Reiner,et al.  The Challenges, Opportunities, and Imperative of Structured Reporting in Medical Imaging , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[23]  Stefan L. Zimmerman,et al.  Informatics in radiology: automated structured reporting of imaging findings using the AIM standard and XML. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[24]  H. Hricak,et al.  Improving Communication of Diagnostic Radiology Findings through Structured Reporting 1 , 2011 .

[25]  Dave Dongelmans,et al.  A usability evaluation of a SNOMED CT based compositional interface terminology for intensive care , 2012, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[26]  Monique W. M. Jaspers,et al.  Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[27]  Heinz U Lemke,et al.  Short history of PACS (Part II: Europe). , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[28]  J. A. Parker,et al.  An All-digital Nuclear Medicine Department , 2002, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[29]  Jin-Sook Ryu,et al.  PET/CT Fusion Viewing Software for Use with Picture Archiving and Communication Systems , 2010, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[30]  Mark Chignell,et al.  Usability testing of two e-learning resources: methods to maximize potential for clinician use. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[31]  A. Bischof Delaloye,et al.  Clinical quality management in telenuclear medicine , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[32]  Kaveh G Shojania,et al.  Usability evaluation of order sets in a computerised provider order entry system , 2011, BMJ quality & safety.

[33]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Lesion Detection in Dynamic FDG-PET Using Matched Subspace Detection , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[34]  Valdair Francisco Muglia,et al.  Radiological Reports: A Comparison between the Transmission Efficiency of Information in Free Text and in Structured Reports , 2010, Clinics.

[35]  K. Tägil,et al.  A decision support system improves the interpretation of myocardial perfusion imaging , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[36]  K. Doi,et al.  Development of a computer-aided diagnostic scheme for detection of interval changes in successive whole-body bone scans. , 2006, Medical Physics (Lancaster).

[37]  Bernhard Sattler,et al.  PET/CT (and CT) instrumentation, image reconstruction and data transfer for radiotherapy planning. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[38]  E. Balas,et al.  Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[39]  Shanshan Wang,et al.  An Automated DICOM Database Capable of Arbitrary Data Mining (Including Radiation Dose Indicators) for Quality Monitoring , 2011, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[40]  E. Siegel,et al.  Redesigning the nuclear medicine reading room. , 2011, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[41]  Fokie Cnossen,et al.  Merits of usability testing for PACS selection , 2014, Int. J. Medical Informatics.