Effects of analog and digital filtering on brain stem auditory evoked potentials.

Most investigators of the brains stem auditory evoked potentials utilize analog filters to reduce the noise content of the averaged signals, but different investigators use different filter bandwidths. Data presented in this note compare the effects of different upper and lower cutoff frequencies for both analog and zero-phase shift digital filters. Effects on response wave form and on measured values of amplitude and latency of wave V are considered. It is concluded that, for given cutoff frequencies, analog filtering causes more distortion of the response than digital filtering, due primarily to phase distortion introduced by the analog filter. It is likely that differences in filter cutoff frequencies, especially lower cutoff frequencies, are a significant source of variability in results reported by different investigators.

[1]  D L Jewett,et al.  Auditory-evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of humans. , 1971, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  T. Suzuki,et al.  Effect of high-pass filter on auditory brain stem responses to tone pips. , 1977, Scandinavian audiology.

[3]  C. Elberling Auditory electrophysiology: spectral analysis of cochlear and brain stem evoked potentials. A comment on: Kevanishvili and Aphonchenko: "Frequency composition of brain stem auditory evoked potentials". , 1979, Scandinavian audiology.

[4]  Z. Kevanishvili,et al.  Frequency composition of brain-stem auditory evoked potentials. , 1979, Scandinavian audiology.

[5]  M Don,et al.  Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in man unsing high-pass noise masking. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  J. Boston,et al.  Effectiveness of Earphone Shielding for Artifact Control in Auditory Evoked Potentials , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  W. Dawson,et al.  Phase distortion of biological signals: extraction of signal from noise without phase error. , 1973, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  D. Wastell The application of low-pass linear filters to evoked potential data: filtering without phase distortion. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  J Debecker,et al.  The system bandpass required to avoid distortion of early components when averaging somatosensory evoked potentials. , 1974, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  H. Davis,et al.  Principles of electric response audiometry. , 1976, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[11]  P. Osterhammel,et al.  Far Field Electrocochleography. Frequency Specificity of the Response , 1975 .