Substance P and Renshaw cells: a new concept of inhibitory synaptic interactions.

1. The actions of microelectrophoretically administered substance P on Renshaw cells in pentobarbitone anaesthetized cats were investigated. 2. The effects on spontaneous and synaptic firing and interactions with a number of other agents including acetylcholine, acetyl‐beta‐methylcholine, acidic amino acids, morphine, dihydro‐beta‐erythroidine and strychnine were studied in attempts to elucidate the mechanism of action of substance P. 3. Substance P usually selectively depressed the excitation by ACh, and also reduced submaximal synaptically evoked discharges which activate nicotinic receptors, but failed to modify excitation caused either by acetyl‐beta‐methylcholine, which activates muscarinic receptors, or excitation caused by glutamate or homocysteate. Substance P also depressed excitation by morphine which acted via the nicotinic receptors. 4. The inhibitory effect was not blocked by strychinine and was considered to be unlikely to be due to interaction between the polypeptide and either glycine or GABA receptors. 5. On some cells substance P caused excitation which was blocked by dihydro‐beta‐erythroidine. Mixed excitatory‐inhibitory effects were observed on some of these neurones. 6. The results are discussed in relation to the possibility that substance P could function as a synaptic inhibitory mediator with an unusual selectivity of action.

[1]  S. Konishi,et al.  Substance P and excitatory transmitter of primary sensory neurons. , 1976, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[2]  M. Chang,et al.  Synthesis of substance P. , 1971, Nature: New biology.

[3]  A. Dray,et al.  Substance P in the substantia nigra , 1976, Brain Research.

[4]  G. Pepeu.  The release of acetylcholine from the brain: an approach to the study of the central cholinergic mechanisms. , 1973, Progress in neurobiology.

[5]  K. Kataoka.  The subcellular distribution of substance P in the nervous tissues. , 1962, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[6]  T. Biscoe,et al.  The effects of morphine, etorphine and sinomenine on the chemical sensitivity and synaptic responses of Renshaw cells and other spinal neurones in the rat. , 1974, European journal of pharmacology.

[7]  G. Nilsson,et al.  Substance p: localization in the central nervous system and in some primary sensory neurons , 1975, Science.

[8]  K. Krnjević,et al.  An excitatory action of substance P on cuneate neurones. , 1974, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[9]  J. Kelly.  Microiontophoretic Application of Drugs onto Single Neurons , 1975 .

[10]  J. Hall,et al.  Effects of opiate agonists and antagonists on central neurons of the cat. , 1976, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[11]  K. Krnjević,et al.  Substance P and spinal neurones. , 1975, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[12]  L. Terenius.  Effect of peptides and amino acids on dihydromorphine binding to the opiate receptor , 1975, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[13]  J. Davies.  Effects of morphine and naloxone on renshaw cells and spinal interneurones in morphine dependent and non-dependent rats , 1976, Brain Research.

[14]  Tomoyuki Takahashi,et al.  Regional distribution of substance P in the spinal cord and nerve roots of the cat and the effect of dorsal root section , 1975, Brain Research.

[15]  S. Leeman,et al.  Radioimmunoassay for substance P. , 1973, Nature: New biology.

[16]  J. Henry,et al.  Effects of substance P on functionally identified units in cat spinal cord , 1976, Brain Research.

[17]  F. Lembeck,et al.  Substance P: A Polypeptide of Possible Physiological Significance, Especially Within the Nervous System , 1962 .

[18]  S. Konishi,et al.  Excitatory action of hypothalamic substance P on spinal motoneurones of newborn rats , 1974, Nature.

[19]  R. Ryall.  THE SUBCELLULAR DISTRIBUTIONS OF ACETYLCHOLINE, SUBSTANCE P, 5‐HYDROXYTRYPTAMINE, γ‐AMINOBUTYRIC ACID AND GLUTAMIC ACID IN BRAIN HOMOGENATES , 1964, Journal of neurochemistry.