In situ rheology of Staphylococcus epidermidis bacterial biofilms.

We developed a method to grow Staphylococcus epidermidis bacterial biofilms and characterize their rheological properties in situ in a continuously fed bioreactor incorporated into a parallel plate rheometer. The temperature and shear rates of growth modeled bloodstream conditions, a common site of S. epidermidis infection. We measured the linear elastic (G') and viscous moduli (G″) of the material using small-amplitude oscillatory rheology and the yield stress using non-linear creep rheology. We found that the elastic and viscous moduli of the S. epidermidis biofilm were 11 ± 3 Pa and 1.9 ± 0.5 Pa at a frequency of 1 Hz (6.283 rad per s) and that the yield stress was approximately 20 Pa. We modeled the linear creep response of the biofilm using a Jeffreys model and found that S. epidermidis has a characteristic relaxation time of approximately 750 seconds and a linear creep viscosity of 3000 Pa s. The effects on the linear viscoelastic moduli of environmental stressors, such as NaCl concentration and extremes of temperature, were also studied. We found a non-monotonic relationship between moduli and NaCl concentrations, with the stiffest material properties found at human physiological concentrations (135 mM). Temperature dependent rheology showed hysteresis in the moduli when heated and cooled between 5 °C and 60 °C. Through these experiments, we demonstrated that biofilms are rheologically complex materials that can be characterized by a combination of low modulus (~10 Pa), long relaxation time (~103 seconds), and a finite yield stress (20 Pa). This suggests that biofilms should be viewed as soft viscoelastic solids whose properties are determined in part by local environmental conditions. The in situ growth method introduced here can be adapted to a wide range of biofilm systems and applied over a broad spectrum of rheological and environmental conditions because the technique minimizes the risk of irreversible, non-linear deformation of the microbial specimen before analysis.

[1]  D. Bortz,et al.  Multicellularity and antibiotic resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae grown under bloodstream-mimicking fluid dynamic conditions. , 2012, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[2]  D. Bortz,et al.  DYNAMICAL SYSTEM ANALYSIS OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS BLOODSTREAM INFECTION , 2008, Shock.

[3]  H. Flemming,et al.  The biofilm matrix , 2010, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[4]  Contribution of the Klebsiella pneumoniae Capsule to Bacterial Aggregate and Biofilm Microstructures , 2011, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[5]  Thomas D. Brock,et al.  Biology of microorganisms , 1970 .

[6]  T. van der Poll,et al.  Biomaterial-associated persistence of Staphylococcus epidermidis in pericatheter macrophages. , 2000, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[7]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[8]  M. Solomon,et al.  Soft glassy rheology model applied to stress relaxation of a thermoreversible colloidal gel , 2008 .

[9]  R. Hozalski,et al.  Development and testing of a novel microcantilever technique for measuring the cohesive strength of intact biofilms , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[10]  Wen-Chun Yeh,et al.  Elastic modulus measurements of human liver and correlation with pathology. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  K Miller,et al.  Mechanical properties of brain tissue in-vivo: experiment and computer simulation. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  J. Hacker,et al.  Effect of Subinhibitory Antibiotic Concentrations on Polysaccharide Intercellular Adhesin Expression in Biofilm-Forming Staphylococcus epidermidis , 2000, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[13]  J. Younger,et al.  Flexible microfluidic device for mechanical property characterization of soft viscoelastic solids such as bacterial biofilms. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[14]  Michael P. Brenner,et al.  Biofilms as complex fluids , 2011 .

[15]  G. Petekidis,et al.  Two step yielding in attractive colloids: transition from gels to attractive glasses , 2011 .

[16]  Paul Stoodley,et al.  Bacterial biofilms: from the Natural environment to infectious diseases , 2004, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[17]  Oriana Trubiani,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis mono‐microbial biofilms , 2009, Microbial biotechnology.

[18]  P. Coussot,et al.  Rheophysics of pastes: a review of microscopic modelling approaches. , 2007, Soft matter.

[19]  Paul Stoodley,et al.  Viscoelastic Properties of a Mixed Culture Biofilm from Rheometer Creep Analysis , 2003, Biofouling.

[20]  J. O’Gara,et al.  icaR Encodes a Transcriptional Repressor Involved in Environmental Regulation of ica Operon Expression and Biofilm Formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.

[21]  A Gefen,et al.  Mechanical compression-induced pressure sores in rat hindlimb: muscle stiffness, histology, and computational models. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[22]  Roberto Kolter,et al.  Biofilms: the matrix revisited. , 2005, Trends in microbiology.

[23]  S. Finegold,et al.  NEW SELECTIVE AND DIFFERENTIAL MEDIUM FOR COAGULASE-POSITIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI ALLOWING RAPID GROWTH AND STRAIN DIFFERENTIATION , 1961, Journal of bacteriology.

[24]  J. Costerton,et al.  Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms , 2002, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[25]  Mason,et al.  Optical measurements of frequency-dependent linear viscoelastic moduli of complex fluids. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[26]  Cory J. Rupp,et al.  Commonality of elastic relaxation times in biofilms. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[27]  K. Cooksey,et al.  Adhesion of bacteria and diatoms to surfaces in the sea : a review , 1995 .

[28]  K. Jefferson,et al.  What drives bacteria to produce a biofilm? , 2004, FEMS microbiology letters.

[29]  J. Costerton,et al.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. , 1999, Science.

[30]  J. Costerton,et al.  Biofilms as complex differentiated communities. , 2002, Annual review of microbiology.

[31]  B. Rasmussen,et al.  Filamentous microfossils in a 3,235-million-year-old volcanogenic massive sulphide deposit , 2000, Nature.

[32]  G. Vunjak‐Novakovic,et al.  Tissue engineering of cartilage in space. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  P. Stewart,et al.  Chemical and antimicrobial treatments change the viscoelastic properties of bacterial biofilms , 2011, Biofouling.

[34]  R. Hozalski,et al.  Effect of strain rate on the mechanical properties of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[35]  C. Tiu,et al.  The shear-induced solid–liquid transition in yield stress materials with chemically different structures , 2005 .

[36]  P. Coussot,et al.  Aging and solid or liquid behavior in pastes , 2006 .

[37]  Joseph Loscalzo,et al.  Thrombosis and Hemorrhage , 2002 .

[38]  M. Otto Staphylococcus epidermidis — the 'accidental' pathogen , 2009, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[39]  Jost Wingender,et al.  Community structure and co-operation in biofilms: Cohesiveness in biofilm matrix polymers , 2000 .

[40]  Y. Lim,et al.  Control of Glucose- and NaCl-Induced Biofilm Formation by rbf in Staphylococcus aureus , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[41]  G. Debrégeas,et al.  Rheology of soft glassy materials , 2002 .

[42]  C. Zukoski,et al.  Shear and compressive rheology of aggregated alumina suspensions , 1997 .

[43]  W. G. Characklis Bioengineering report: Fouling biofilm development: A process analysis , 1981 .

[44]  C. Baravian,et al.  Using instrumental inertia in controlled stress rheometry , 1998 .