Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin with fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND Unfractionated heparin is often used as adjunctive therapy with fibrinolysis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. We compared a low-molecular-weight heparin, enoxaparin, with unfractionated heparin for this purpose. METHODS We randomly assigned 20,506 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction who were scheduled to undergo fibrinolysis to receive enoxaparin throughout the index hospitalization or weight-based unfractionated heparin for at least 48 hours. The primary efficacy end point was death or nonfatal recurrent myocardial infarction through 30 days. RESULTS The primary end point occurred in 12.0 percent of patients in the unfractionated heparin group and 9.9 percent of those in the enoxaparin group (17 percent reduction in relative risk, P<0.001). Nonfatal reinfarction occurred in 4.5 percent of the patients receiving unfractionated heparin and 3.0 percent of those receiving enoxaparin (33 percent reduction in relative risk, P<0.001); 7.5 percent of patients given unfractionated heparin died, as did 6.9 percent of those given enoxaparin (P=0.11). The composite of death, nonfatal reinfarction, or urgent revascularization occurred in 14.5 percent of patients given unfractionated heparin and 11.7 percent of those given enoxaparin (P<0.001); major bleeding occurred in 1.4 percent and 2.1 percent, respectively (P<0.001). The composite of death, nonfatal reinfarction, or nonfatal intracranial hemorrhage (a measure of net clinical benefit) occurred in 12.2 percent of patients given unfractionated heparin and 10.1 percent of those given enoxaparin (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS In patients receiving fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction, treatment with enoxaparin throughout the index hospitalization is superior to treatment with unfractionated heparin for 48 hours but is associated with an increase in major bleeding episodes. These findings should be interpreted in the context of net clinical benefit. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00077792.).

[1]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Unfractionated and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin as Adjuncts to Thrombolysis in Aspirin-Treated Patients With ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Trials , 2005, Circulation.

[2]  E. Antman,et al.  Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin as antithrombin therapy in patients receiving fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Design and rationale for the Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction study 25 (E , 2005, American heart journal.

[3]  Timi Study Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin as antithrombin therapy in patients receiving fibrinolysis for ST- elevation myocardial infarction: Design and rationale for the Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment- Th , 2005 .

[4]  G. Lamas,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients wi , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase in Combination With the Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Enoxaparin or Unfractionated Heparin in the Prehospital Setting: The Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Regimen (ASSENT)-3 PLUS Randomized Trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2003, Circulation.

[6]  E. Antman,et al.  Early and long-term clinical outcomes associated with reinfarction following fibrinolytic administration in the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction trials. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  E. Antman The Search for Replacements for Unfractionated Heparin , 2001, Circulation.

[8]  E. Topol A comparison of reteplase with alteplase for acute myocardial infarction. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  J. Weitz Low-molecular-weight heparins. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  E. Antman Hirudin in acute myocardial infarction. Thrombolysis and Thrombin Inhibition in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 9B trial. , 1996, Circulation.

[11]  M. Simoons A comparison of recombinant hirudin with heparin for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Prognostic significance of nonfatal reinfarction during 3-year follow-up: results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) phase II clinical trial. The TIMI Investigators. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  Frans Van de Werf,et al.  An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  M. Pfisterer,et al.  Effect of early intravenous heparin on coronary patency, infarct size, and bleeding complications after alteplase thrombolysis: results of a randomised double blind European Cooperative Study Group trial. , 1992, British heart journal.

[15]  H. Hellstrom Consequences of reocclusion after successful reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction. , 1991, Circulation.

[16]  A. Tonkin,et al.  A Randomized Comparison of Intravenous Heparin With Oral Aspirin and Dipyridamole 24 Hours After Recombinant Tissue‐Type Plasminogen Activator for Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1991, Circulation.

[17]  W. Daniel,et al.  Increased Thrombin Levels During Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Relevance for the Success of Therapy , 1991, Circulation.

[18]  J. Hsia,et al.  A comparison between heparin and low-dose aspirin as adjunctive therapy with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction. Heparin-Aspirin Reperfusion Trial (HART) Investigators. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  R. Califf,et al.  Consequences of reocclusion after successful reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction. TAMI Study Group. , 1990, Circulation.

[20]  Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Soprawivenza nell'Inf Miocardico. MEDICAL SCIENCE GISSI-2: A factorial randomised trial of alteplase versus streptokinase and heparin versus no heparin among 12 490 patients with acute myocardial infarction , 1990, The Lancet.

[21]  K. Lee,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and early intravenous heparin in acute myocardial infarction. , 1989, Circulation.

[22]  J. Spann,et al.  Factors influencing reocclusion after coronary thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  S. M. Collins,et al.  Rethrombosis after reperfusion with streptokinase: importance of geometry of residual lesions. , 1984, Circulation.