Awareness as an antidote to distance: making distributed groups cooperative and consistent

Sociometric feedback visualizes social signals among group members to increase their awareness of their communication patterns. We deployed the Meeting Mediator, a real-time sociometric feedback system to groups participating in two rounds of a social dilemma task: in one round, all members were co-located and in the other round, the members were geographically distributed. Laboratory results show that the sociometric feedback successfully increases the speaking time and the frequency of turn transitions of groups that are initially distributed and later co-located, and also leads to a higher cooperation rate, increasing the overall earnings of these groups. In addition, the sociometric feedback helps groups have a more consistent pattern of behavior before and after a change in their geographic distribution. Therefore, the sociometric feedback influences the communication patterns of distributed groups and makes them more cooperative. Furthermore, the sociometric feedback helps groups sustain those patterns of communication even after a change in geographic distribution.

[1]  Janienke Sturm,et al.  Multimodal support for social dynamics in co-located meetings , 2010, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[2]  Walter Bender,et al.  Influencing group participation with a shared display , 2004, CSCW.

[3]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Towards Measuring Human Interactions in Conversational Settings , 2001 .

[4]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  John F. Canny,et al.  Multiview: improving trust in group video conferencing through spatial faithfulness , 2007, CHI.

[6]  N. Sadat Shami,et al.  Traveling blues: the effect of relocation on partially distributed teams , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[7]  S. Komorita,et al.  Interpersonal Relations: Mixed-Motive Interaction , 1995 .

[8]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Sensible Organizations: Technology and Methodology for Automatically Measuring Organizational Behavior , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[9]  Elena Rocco,et al.  Trust breaks down in electronic contexts but can be repaired by some initial face-to-face contact , 1998, CHI.

[10]  C. Gersick.  Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[11]  C. Bicchieri,et al.  Computer-mediated communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: an experimental analysis , 2007 .

[12]  Janice R. Kelly,et al.  Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. , 1985 .

[13]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Visualizing real-time language-based feedback on teamwork behavior in computer-mediated groups , 2009, CHI.

[14]  Sumit Basu,et al.  Modeling Conversational Dynamics as a Mixed-Memory Markov Process , 2004, NIPS.

[15]  Jun Zheng,et al.  Trust without touch: jump-start trust with social chat , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[16]  R. W. Root,et al.  Informal Communication in Organizations: Form, Function, and Technology , 1990 .

[17]  Peter Werkhoven,et al.  How Conversations Change Over Time in Face-to-Face and Video-Mediated Communication , 2009 .

[18]  Darren Gergle,et al.  Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development , 2002, CHI.

[19]  Joseph E. McGrath,et al.  Time matters in groups , 1990 .

[20]  Tor Hernes,et al.  Effects of media of communication and collaboration in structural change: insights from a computer-mediated research group , 2000 .

[21]  John Orbell,et al.  Explaining discussion-induced cooperation. , 1988 .