Modelling of the simultaneous photodegradation of Acid Red 97, Acid Orange 61 and Acid Brown 425 using factor screening and response surface strategies.

In this paper the influence of seven variables that could be relevant in the photodegradation of three textile dyes - Acid Red 97, Acid Orange 61 and Acid Brown 425 - has been studied with the aim of determining the most efficient conditions for this process. The type and concentration of catalyst, the presence and concentration of H(2)O(2), the stirring, the pH and the dye concentration have been studied as variables. In the first stage the more basic variables were analyzed using a screening methodology (saturated fractional factorial design) and it was concluded that the most influential variable was the presence of H(2)O(2). In the second stage, a central composite design was used to establish a response surface for the behavior of the photodegradation. In this stage the concentration of Acid Brown 425 was fixed and the degradation was carried out without catalyst. The most remarkable aspects of the experiment are that brown dye is always the most persistent in the solution and that a catalyst is not needed to degrade the dyes quickly. A second-order equation is needed to model this process. The response surface obtained could be useful for reducing the time and money needed to treat effluent wastewater.

[1]  Tugba Olmez-Hanci,et al.  Treatment of azo dye production wastewaters using Photo-Fenton-like advanced oxidation processes: Optimization by response surface methodology , 2009 .

[2]  M. P. Callao,et al.  Use of multivariate curve resolution for determination of chromium in tanning samples using sequential injection analysis , 2005, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[3]  M. Gutiérrez,et al.  Decolourisation of simulated reactive dyebath effluents by electrochemical oxidation assisted by UV light. , 2006, Chemosphere.

[4]  Lizhong Zhu,et al.  Catalytic degradation of Orange II by UV-Fenton with hydroxyl-Fe-pillared bentonite in water. , 2006, Chemosphere.

[5]  T. Peng,et al.  Photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange in aqueous suspension of mesoporous titania nanoparticles. , 2007, Chemosphere.

[6]  N. Modirshahla,et al.  Critical effect of hydrogen peroxide concentration in photochemical oxidative degradation of C.I. Acid Red 27 (AR27). , 2004, Chemosphere.

[7]  Regina de Fátima Peralta Muniz Moreira,et al.  Kinetics of photocatalytic degradation of reactive dyes in a TiO2 slurry reactor , 2002 .

[8]  R. Irusta,et al.  Decolouration of textile dyes in wastewaters by photocatalysis with TiO2 , 2005 .

[9]  Shih-Hsien Chang,et al.  Degradation of Reactive Black 5 using combined electrochemical degradation-solar-light/immobilized TiO2 film process and toxicity evaluation. , 2008, Chemosphere.

[10]  Raquel O. Cristóvão,et al.  Optimisation of reactive textile dyes degradation by laccase–mediator system , 2008 .

[11]  Anca Florentina Caliman,et al.  Optimized photocatalytic degradation of Alcian Blue 8 GX in the presence of TiO2 suspensions. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[12]  Bahadir K Körbahti Response surface optimization of electrochemical treatment of textile dye wastewater. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[13]  M. A. Rauf,et al.  Photolytic decolorization of Rose Bengal by UV/H(2)O(2) and data optimization using response surface method. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[14]  Raquel O. Cristóvão,et al.  Application of statistical experimental methodology to optimize reactive dye decolourization by commercial laccase. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[15]  E. Macedo,et al.  OPTIMISATION OF REACTIVE DYE DEGRADATION BY LACCASE USING BOX–BEHNKEN DESIGN , 2008, Environmental technology.

[16]  M. P. Callao,et al.  Study of the influential factors in the simultaneous photocatalytic degradation process of three textile dyes. , 2009, Talanta.

[17]  T. Lundstedt,et al.  Experimental design and optimization , 1998 .

[18]  M. Singh,et al.  Studies on photodegradation of two commercial dyes in aqueous phase using different photocatalysts. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[19]  Grady Hanrahan,et al.  Application of Factorial and Response Surface Methodology in Modern Experimental Design and Optimization , 2006 .

[20]  M. A. Rauf,et al.  Application of response surface analysis to the photolytic degradation of Basic Red 2 dye , 2008 .

[21]  M. P. Callao,et al.  Kinetic and adsorption study of acid dye removal using activated carbon. , 2007, Chemosphere.

[22]  M. P. Callao,et al.  Modeling the adsorption of dyes onto activated carbon by using experimental designs. , 2008, Talanta.

[23]  I. D. Mall,et al.  Removal of congo red from aqueous solution by bagasse fly ash and activated carbon: kinetic study and equilibrium isotherm analyses. , 2005, Chemosphere.

[24]  A. Fernández-Alba,et al.  Photodegradation of malachite green under natural sunlight irradiation: kinetic and toxicity of the transformation products. , 2008, Chemosphere.

[25]  J. Baeza,et al.  Optimized photodegradation of Reactive Blue 19 on TiO2 and ZnO suspensions , 2002 .

[26]  N. Durán,et al.  Degradation and toxicity reduction of textile effluent by combined photocatalytic and ozonation processes. , 2000, Chemosphere.

[27]  M. Bouchy,et al.  Decolourization of Textile Industry Wastewater by the Photocatalytic Degradation Process , 2001 .

[28]  M. A. Rauf,et al.  Photolytic oxidation of Coomassie Brilliant Blue with H2O2 , 2005 .

[29]  M. A. Rauf,et al.  Photolytic oxidation of Safranin-O with H2O2 , 2007 .

[30]  L. Wojnárovits,et al.  Irradiation treatment of azo dye containing wastewater: An overview , 2008 .

[31]  Johanna Smeyers-Verbeke,et al.  Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics: Part A , 1997 .