How can my research paper be useful for future meta-analyses on forest restoration plantations?

Statistical meta-analysis is a powerful and useful tool to quantitatively synthesize the information conveyed in published studies on a particular topic. It allows identifying and quantifying overall patterns and exploring causes of variation. The inclusion of published works in meta-analyses requires, however, a minimum quality standard of the reported data and information on the methodology used. Our experience with conducting a meta-analysis on the relationship between seedling quality and field performance is that nearly one third of the apparently relevant publications had to be discarded because essential data, usually statistical dispersion parameters, were not properly reported. In addition, we encountered substantial difficulty to explore the effect of covariates due to the poor description of nursery cultivation methods, plantation location, and management in a significant proportion of the selected primary studies. Thus, we present guidelines for improving methodology detail and data presentation so that future forest restoration-oriented research can be more readily incorporated into meta-analyses. In general, research studies should report data on means, sample size, and any measure of variation even if they are not statistically significant. The online availability of raw data is the best practice to facilitate the inclusion of primary research on meta-analyses. Providing full information about the production of nursery seedlings, such as plant material and experimental conditions, is essential to test whether these procedures might have an effect on seedling quality. In addition, detailed information about field trials such as site climate, soil preparation techniques, previous land use, or post-plantation management, is needed to elucidate whether seedling quality is context-dependent. Thus, we provide a detailed checklist of important information that should be included when reporting forest restoration research involving the use of nursery-produced seedlings. All this will help to quantitatively synthetize current state-of-knowledge and thus contribute to the advancement of the forest restoration discipline.

[1]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Transparency in Ecology and Evolution: Real Problems, Real Solutions. , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists , 2007, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[3]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Effect sizes: Conventional choices and calculations , 2013 .

[4]  R. K. Dumroese,et al.  Nursery manual for native plants: A guide for tribal nurseries - Volume 1: Nursery management , 2009 .

[5]  浅川 澄彦 南部のマツの造林(Planting the Southern Pines), WAKELEY, P. C., Agriculture Monograph, No. 18,pp. 233,1954,Forest Service, U. S. D. A., $2.75. , 1959 .

[6]  J. Puértolas,et al.  Deep planting with shelters improves performance of different stocktype sizes under arid Mediterranean conditions , 2012, New Forests.

[7]  R. K. Dumroese,et al.  Using container weights to determine irrigation needs: a simple method , 2015 .

[8]  Kerrie Mengersen,et al.  Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution , 2013 .

[9]  D. McCreary,et al.  The Effects of Different Sizes of Tree Shelters on Blue Oak (Quercus douglasii) Growth , 2001 .

[10]  Lorena Gómez Aparicio The role of plant interactions in the restoration of degraded ecosystems: a meta-analysis across life-forms and ecosystems , 2009 .

[11]  Therese D. Pigott,et al.  Methods for handling missing data in research synthesis. , 1994 .

[12]  D. Page-Dumroese,et al.  Allometry, nitrogen status, and carbon stable isotope composition of Pinus ponderosa seedlings in two growing media with contrasting nursery irrigation regimes , 2011 .

[13]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  What does research reproducibility mean? , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[14]  D. Dey,et al.  Mechanical site preparation for forest restoration , 2012, New Forests.

[15]  J. Puértolas,et al.  Light transmissivity of tube shelters affects root growth and biomass allocation of Quercus ilex L. and Pinus halepensis Mill , 2013, Annals of Forest Science.

[16]  O. W. Archibold,et al.  Effect of site preparation on soil properties and vegetation cover, and the growth and survival of white spruce (Picea glauca) seedlings, in Saskatchewan , 2000 .

[17]  Thomas D. Landis,et al.  Meeting forest restoration challenges: Using the Target Plant Concept , 2016 .

[18]  R. Driessche Relationship between spacing and nitrogen fertilization of seedlings in the nursery, seedling size, and outplanting performance , 1982 .

[19]  Mark J. Hainds,et al.  Determining the Correct Planting Depth For Container-Grown Longleaf Pine Seedlings , 2004 .

[20]  J. Macdonald,et al.  Why seedlings grow: influence of plant attributes , 2017, New Forests.

[21]  V. Russo Mineral nutrient and protein contents in tissues, and yield of navy bean, in response to nitrogen fertilization and row spacing , 2006 .

[22]  D. Page-Dumroese,et al.  Exponential fertilization of Pinus monticola seedlings: nutrient uptake efficiency, leaching fractions, and early outplanting performance , 2005 .

[23]  J. M. Rey Benayas,et al.  Increase in size and nitrogen concentration enhances seedling survival in Mediterranean plantations. Insights from an ecophysiological conceptual model of plant survival , 2012, New Forests.

[24]  B. Thompson Establishing a Vigorous Nursery Crop: Bed Preparation, Seed Sowing, and Early Seedling Growth , 1984 .

[25]  Benjamin O. Knapp,et al.  Effect of initial seedling size, understory competition, and overstory density on the survival and growth of Pinus echinata seedlings underplanted in hardwood forests for restoration , 2015, New Forests.

[26]  E. Andivia,et al.  Assessing the effect of late-season fertilization on Holm oak plant quality: insights from morpho–nutritional characterizations and water relations parameters , 2014, New Forests.

[27]  F. Maestre,et al.  Ecotechnology as a tool for restoring degraded drylands: A meta-analysis of field experiments , 2013 .

[28]  K. Radoglou,et al.  The impact of storage, desiccation and planting date on seedling quality and survival of woody plant species , 2002 .

[29]  B. Schmid,et al.  Establishment success in a forest biodiversity and ecosystem functioning experiment in subtropical China (BEF-China) , 2013, European Journal of Forest Research.

[30]  Thomas D. Landis,et al.  Conducting seedling stock type trials: A new approach to an old question , 2011 .

[31]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Quality Assessment of Temperate Zone Deciduous Hardwood Seedlings , 2006, New Forests.

[32]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Uses and misuses of meta‐analysis in plant ecology , 2014 .

[33]  P. García‐Fayos,et al.  Physiological and transplanting performance of Quercus ilex L. (holm oak) seedlings grown in nurseries with different winter conditions , 2006 .

[34]  B. Borders,et al.  Growth responses to planting density and management intensity in loblolly pine plantations in the southeastern USA Lower Coastal Plain , 2011, Annals of Forest Science.

[35]  S. Grossnickle,et al.  Bareroot versus container stocktypes: a performance comparison , 2015, New Forests.

[36]  L. Gómez‐Aparicio,et al.  The role of plant interactions in the restoration of degraded ecosystems: a meta‐analysis across life‐forms and ecosystems , 2009 .

[37]  M. Lajeunesse 13. Recovering Missing or Partial Data from Studies: A Survey of Conversions and Imputations for Meta-analysis , 2013 .

[38]  A. Vilagrosa,et al.  Short-term nitrogen deprivation increases field performance in nursery seedlings of Mediterranean woody species , 2008 .

[39]  Douglass F. Jacobs,et al.  Restoring forests: advances in techniques and theory , 2012, New Forests.

[40]  G. Ritchie Assessing Seedling Quality , 1984 .

[41]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Methodological issues and advances in biological meta-analysis , 2012, Evolutionary Ecology.

[42]  Peter S. Curtis,et al.  4. Gathering Data: Searching Literature and Selection Criteria , 2013 .

[43]  P. Hahn Plug + 1 Seedling Production , 1984 .

[44]  D. South,et al.  Nursery and site preparation interaction research in the United States , 2001, New Forests.

[45]  R. Kasten Dumroese,et al.  Contemporary forest restoration: A review emphasizing function , 2014 .

[46]  J. Benayas Growth and survival in Quercus ilex L. seedlings after irrigation and artificial shading on Mediterranean set-aside agricultural land , 1998 .

[47]  Gavin B. Stewart,et al.  Meta-analysis in applied ecology , 2010, Biology Letters.

[48]  James Rourke,et al.  A World of Opportunity. , 2008 .

[49]  J. Puértolas,et al.  Effects of nursery shading on seedling quality and post-planting performance in two Mediterranean species with contrasting shade tolerance , 2009, New Forests.

[50]  Alain F. Zuur,et al.  A protocol for conducting and presenting results of regression‐type analyses , 2016 .

[51]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Will your paper be used in a meta‐analysis? Make the reach of your research broader and longer lasting , 2017 .

[52]  J. Mexal,et al.  Container characteristics influence Pinus pinea seedling development in the nursery and field , 2006 .

[53]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Reporting standards in experimental studies. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[54]  Chad N. Casselman,et al.  Effects of silvicultural treatments on survival and growth of trees planted on reclaimed mine lands in the Appalachians , 2006 .

[55]  Benny Goodman World of opportunity. , 2006, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[56]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Drought tolerance and transplanting performance of holm oak (Quercus ilex) seedlings after drought hardening in the nursery. , 2004, Tree physiology.

[57]  R. N. Cerrillo,et al.  Site preparation, stock quality and planting date effect on early establishment of Holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) seedlings. , 2009 .

[58]  M. Duryea Nursery Cultural Practices: Impacts on Seedling Quality , 1984 .

[59]  Why seedlings survive: influence of plant attributes , 2012, New Forests.

[60]  J. R. Dunlap,et al.  Root growth potential: its development and expression in forest tree seedlings. , 1980 .

[61]  M. Holmgren,et al.  Tree establishment along an ENSO experimental gradient in the Atacama desert , 2007 .

[62]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Meta-evaluation of meta-analysis: ten appraisal questions for biologists , 2017, BMC Biology.