The functions of freezing in the social interactions of juvenile high- and low-aggressive mice

Selectively bred low-aggressive mice are frequently observed to freeze on social contact, despite the fact that this behavior was never a direct target of selection. To elucidate this finding, the present research aimed to identify the possible functions freezing may serve in social interactions. It was hypothesized that freezing may modify social interactions through self-regulatory mechanisms and/or via its modulating effects on the actions of social partners. These hypotheses were evaluated with respect to the sequential changes observed over the course of a 10-min dyadic test in freezing, social reactivity, and approaches among juvenile (24–30-day-old) mice from the NC900 and NC100 high- and low-aggressive lines. Analyses of the patterns of social interactions between subjects and partners revealed two primary results. First, freezing was more than an expression of fear; it also functioned as a regulator of emotional arousal, as suggested by the substantial reduction of reactive behaviors seen in animals that showed high levels of freezing. Second, freezing functioned to facilitate high levels of affiliative social interaction with social partners. The implications of these results for understanding how the differentiation of the NC900 and NC100 occurred within microevolution and development are discussed. Aggr. Behav. 27:463–475, 2001. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

[1]  Daniel J. Bauer,et al.  Selective breeding for differential aggression in mice provides evidence for heterochrony in social behaviours , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  Michel Baudry,et al.  The amygdala modulates prefrontal cortex activity relative to conditioned fear , 1999, Nature.

[3]  J. Gariépy,et al.  D1 dopamine receptor mediation of social and nonsocial emotional reactivity in mice: effects of housing and strain difference in motor activity. , 1997, Behavioral neuroscience.

[4]  N. K. Sandnabba,et al.  Selective breeding for isolation-induced intermale aggression in mice: associated responses and environmental influences. , 1996, Behavior genetics.

[5]  J. Koolhaas,et al.  Aggression in wild house mice: Current state of affairs , 1996, Behavior genetics.

[6]  R. Mailman,et al.  Rearing conditions alter social reactivity and D1 dopamine receptors in high- and low-aggressive mice , 1995, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[7]  M. A. McDonald,et al.  Behavioral and morphological correlates of heterochrony in Hispaniolan Palm-Tanagers , 1994 .

[8]  R. Mailman,et al.  Social Reactivity and D1 Dopamine Receptors: Studies in Mice Selectively Bred for High and Low Levels of Aggression , 1994, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[9]  D. Blanchard,et al.  Defense system psychopharmacology: An ethological approach to the pharmacology of fear and anxiety , 1993, Behavioural Brain Research.

[10]  R B Cairns,et al.  Development, microevolution, and social behavior. , 1990, Psychological review.

[11]  R. Cairns,et al.  A developmental‐genetic analysis of aggressive behavior in mice: IV. Genotype‐environment interaction , 1989 .

[12]  R. Cairns,et al.  A developmental-genetic analysis of aggressive behavior in mice (Mus musculus): III. Behavioral mediation by heightened reactivity or immobility? , 1988, Journal of comparative psychology.

[13]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Different projections of the central amygdaloid nucleus mediate autonomic and behavioral correlates of conditioned fear , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Lawton,et al.  Heterochrony, Deferred Breeding, and Avian Sociality , 1986 .

[15]  R. Cairns,et al.  On fighting in mice: is there a sensitive period for isolation effects? , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  O. Fujita,et al.  Intermale aggression in rats selected for emotional reactivity and their reciprocal F1 and F2 hybrids , 1984 .

[17]  R. Cairns,et al.  A developmental-genetic analysis of aggressive behavior in mice: I. Behavioral outcomes. , 1983, Journal of comparative psychology.

[18]  G. Gallup Tonic Immobility: the Role of Fear and Predation , 1977 .

[19]  J. Henry,et al.  Stress, Health, and the Social Environment , 1977, Topics in Environmental Physiology and Medicine.

[20]  R. Cairns,et al.  Fighting in mice: dyadic escalation and what is learned. , 1973, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[21]  R. Cairns,et al.  On fighting in mice: Situational determinants O intragroup dyadic stimulation , 1970 .

[22]  J. L. Fuller Experimental Deprivation and Later Behavior , 1967, Science.

[23]  E. C. Grant,et al.  A comparison of the social postures of some common laboratory rodents. , 1963 .