BIOINFORMATICS ORIGINAL PAPER doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm250 Structural bioinformatics Persistent voids: a new structural metric for membrane fusion

MOTIVATION Membrane fusion constitutes a key stage in cellular processes such as synaptic neurotransmission and infection by enveloped viruses. Current experimental assays for fusion have thus far been unable to resolve early fusion events in fine structural detail. We have previously used molecular dynamics simulations to develop mechanistic models of fusion by small lipid vesicles. Here, we introduce a novel structural measurement of vesicle topology and fusion geometry: persistent voids. RESULTS Persistent voids calculations enable systematic measurement of structural changes in vesicle fusion by assessing fusion stalk widths. They also constitute a generally applicable technique for assessing lipid topological change. We use persistent voids to compute dynamic relationships between hemifusion neck widening and formation of a full fusion pore in our simulation data. We predict that a tightly coordinated process of hemifusion neck expansion and pore formation is responsible for the rapid vesicle fusion mechanism, while isolated enlargement of the hemifusion diaphragm leads to the formation of a metastable hemifused intermediate. These findings suggest that rapid fusion between small vesicles proceeds via a small hemifusion diaphragm rather than a fully expanded one. AVAILABILITY Software available upon request pending public release. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Supplementary data are available on Bioinformatics online.

[1]  M. Müller,et al.  A new mechanism of model membrane fusion determined from Monte Carlo simulation. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[2]  Siewert J Marrink,et al.  The mechanism of vesicle fusion as revealed by molecular dynamics simulations. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[3]  Vijay S Pande,et al.  Using path sampling to build better Markovian state models: predicting the folding rate and mechanism of a tryptophan zipper beta hairpin. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[4]  S. Ohki,et al.  A theory of membrane fusion , 1984 .

[5]  Michael M. Kozlov,et al.  Membrane Hemifusion: Crossing a Chasm in Two Leaps , 2005, Cell.

[6]  J. Rothman,et al.  SNAREs can promote complete fusion and hemifusion as alternative outcomes , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  Eric J. Sorin,et al.  How well can simulation predict protein folding kinetics and thermodynamics? , 2005, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[8]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Hemifusion in SNARE-mediated membrane fusion , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[9]  Afra Zomorodian,et al.  Computing Persistent Homology , 2004, SCG '04.

[10]  Yonathan Kozlovsky,et al.  Stalk model of membrane fusion: solution of energy crisis. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[11]  A. Mark,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation of the formation, structure, and dynamics of small phospholipid vesicles. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[12]  Gerrit Groenhof,et al.  GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[13]  Judith M. White,et al.  Lipid-anchored influenza hemagglutinin promotes hemifusion, not complete fusion , 1994, Cell.

[14]  William Swope,et al.  Describing Protein Folding Kinetics by Molecular Dynamics Simulations. 2. Example Applications to Alanine Dipeptide and a β-Hairpin Peptide† , 2004 .

[15]  M. Kozlov,et al.  On the theory of membrane fusion. The stalk mechanism. , 1984, General physiology and biophysics.

[16]  H Edelsbrunner,et al.  Analytical shape computation of macromolecules: II. Inaccessible cavities in proteins , 1998, Proteins.

[17]  Michael R. Shirts,et al.  COMPUTING: Screen Savers of the World Unite! , 2000, Science.

[18]  William Swope,et al.  Describing Protein Folding Kinetics by Molecular Dynamics Simulations. 1. Theory , 2004 .

[19]  A. Mark,et al.  Coarse grained model for semiquantitative lipid simulations , 2004 .

[20]  D. Siegel,et al.  Energetics of intermediates in membrane fusion: comparison of stalk and inverted micellar intermediate mechanisms. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[21]  G. Melikyan,et al.  The Energetics of Membrane Fusion from Binding, through Hemifusion, Pore Formation, and Pore Enlargement , 2004, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[22]  S Subramaniam,et al.  Analytical shape computation of macromolecules: I. molecular area and volume through alpha shape , 1998, Proteins.

[23]  Peter M. Kasson,et al.  Ensemble molecular dynamics yields submillisecond kinetics and intermediates of membrane fusion , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Herbert Edelsbrunner,et al.  Three-dimensional alpha shapes , 1994, ACM Trans. Graph..

[25]  Barry R Lentz,et al.  Kinetics of lipid rearrangements during poly(ethylene glycol)-mediated fusion of highly curved unilamellar vesicles. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[26]  J. Zimmerberg,et al.  The hemifusion intermediate and its conversion to complete fusion: regulation by membrane composition. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[27]  Vijay S. Pande,et al.  Screen Savers of the World Unite! , 2000, Science.

[28]  R Llinás,et al.  Relationship between presynaptic calcium current and postsynaptic potential in squid giant synapse. , 1981, Biophysical journal.

[29]  Kozlov Mm,et al.  On the Theory of Membrane Fusion. The Stalk Mechanism , 1984 .

[30]  Thomas B Woolf,et al.  Insights into the molecular mechanism of membrane fusion from simulation: evidence for the association of splayed tails. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[31]  M. Mueller,et al.  Field theoretic study of bilayer membrane fusion: II. Mechanism of a stalk-hole complex. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[32]  Marcus Mueller,et al.  Field theoretic study of bilayer membrane fusion , 2004 .