Next-of-kin's conceptions of medical technology in palliative homecare.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES Describe next-of-kin's conceptions of medical technology in palliative homecare. BACKGROUND Next-of-kin to palliative patients are in an exposed position with increasing responsibility. The more involved they are in the care, the greater caregiver burden they describe. Medical technology has become increasingly common in palliative homecare, and previous research suggests that the devices transform the homes to a hospital ward, thus shifting responsibility from the personnel to the next-of-kin. DESIGN An explorative descriptive design with a phenomenographic approach was chosen to describe qualitatively different conceptions of the phenomenon medical technology. METHOD Interviews with 15 next-of-kin to patients in palliative homecare were analysed in a seven-step process where 10 conceptions emerged in five description categories. RESULTS Medical technology in palliative homecare required next-of-kin's responsibility in monitoring or providing practical help. It also implied uncertainty among the next-of-kin because of worries about its safety or because of an improper handling. The technology trespassed on daily life because it restricted and affected the private sphere. Medical technology enabled comfort as it implied security and was a prerequisite for the patient to be cared for at home. It also required an adjustment to comprehend and manage the medical technology. CONCLUSIONS Medical technology resulted in an increased caregiver burden and uncertainty among the next-of-kin. Although it meant restrictions and affected their social life, they had great confidence in its possibilities. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE It is important to limit the amount of personnel and materials in the home to avoid trespassing on the family's daily life. Medical personnel also have to be sensitive to what next-of-kin have the strength to do and not use them as informal caregivers.

[1]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[2]  C. Tishelman,et al.  The path from oral nutrition to home parenteral nutrition: a qualitative interview study of the experiences of advanced cancer patients and their families. , 2004, Clinical nutrition.

[3]  C. Floriani Home-based palliative care: challenges in the care of technology-dependent children. , 2010, Jornal de pediatria.

[4]  A. Cederborg,et al.  The meaning of technology in an intensive care unit--an interview study. , 2007, Intensive & critical care nursing.

[5]  A. Lasher,et al.  The economic and clinical impact of an inpatient palliative care consultation service: a multifaceted approach. , 2007, Journal of palliative medicine.

[6]  Peter Callery,et al.  Parent or nurse? The experience of being the parent of a technology-dependent child. , 2005, Journal of Advanced Nursing.

[7]  P. Lehoux,et al.  The use of technology at home: what patient manuals say and sell vs. what patients face and fear. , 2004, Sociology of health & illness.

[8]  M. Svantesson,et al.  End-of-life decisions in Swedish ICUs. How do physicians from the admitting department reason? , 2003, Intensive & critical care nursing.

[9]  F. Marton Phenomenography — Describing conceptions of the world around us , 1981 .

[10]  Bengt Fridlund,et al.  District nurses' conceptions of medical technology in palliative homecare. , 2011, Journal of nursing management.

[11]  L. Hanson,et al.  Clinical and economic impact of palliative care consultation. , 2008, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[12]  Olle Söderhamn,et al.  Self-care among persons using advanced medical technology at home. , 2009, Journal of clinical nursing.

[13]  B. Fridlund,et al.  Next-of-kin caregivers in palliative home care--from control to loss of control. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[14]  Rn Berit Munck MNSc,et al.  District nurses' conceptions of medical technology in palliative homecare , 2011 .

[15]  Bengt Fridlund,et al.  Women patients' conceptions of integrity within health care: a phenomenographic study. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[16]  H. Abu‐Saad,et al.  Vulnerability of family caregivers in terminal palliative care at home; balancing between burden and capacity. , 2003, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[17]  Birgitta Andershed,et al.  Relatives in end-of-life care--part 1: a systematic review of the literature the five last years, January 1999-February 2004. , 2006, Journal of clinical nursing.

[18]  B. Fridlund,et al.  Living on hold in palliative cancer care , 2010 .

[19]  Berit Lindahl,et al.  Meanings of living at home on a ventilator. , 2003, Nursing inquiry.

[20]  Anne M. Mentro,et al.  Caring for Medically Fragile Children in the Home: An Alternative Theoretical Approach , 2002, Research and Theory for Nursing Practice.

[21]  M. Fallsberg,et al.  Phenomenography as a qualitative approach in social pharmacy research. , 1991 .

[22]  B. Given,et al.  Burden and depression among caregivers of patients with cancer at the end of life. , 2004, Oncology nursing forum.

[23]  P. Carter Caregivers' descriptions of sleep changes and depressive symptoms. , 2002, Oncology nursing forum.

[24]  Andrew Georgiou,et al.  Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the ACCREDIT project study protocol , 2011, BMC Research Notes.

[25]  Peter Hudson,et al.  Positive aspects and challenges associated with caring for a dying relative at home. , 2004, International journal of palliative nursing.

[26]  E. Athlin,et al.  Being a nurse in nursing home for patients on the edge of life. , 2009, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[27]  Alan Barnard,et al.  Technology-dependent children and their families: a review. , 2004, Journal of advanced nursing.

[28]  A. Milberg,et al.  Met and unmet needs in hospital-based home care: qualitative evaluation through open-ended questions , 2000, Palliative medicine.

[29]  P. Lehoux,et al.  Patients' perspectives on high-tech home care: a qualitative inquiry into the user-friendliness of four technologies , 2004, BMC health services research.

[30]  H. Olsson,et al.  Influence on the health of the partner affected by tumor disease in the wife or husband based on a population-based register study of cancer in Sweden. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  S. Meghani A concept analysis of palliative care in the United States. , 2004, Journal of advanced nursing.

[32]  I. Ekman,et al.  Being a close relative of a person with severe, chronic heart failure in palliative advanced home care -- a comfort but also a strain. , 2007, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[33]  Carina Werkander Harstäde,et al.  Next of kin’s feelings of guilt and shame in end-of-life care , 2007 .

[34]  Ursula Lucas,et al.  Achieving Empathy and Engagement: A practical approach to the design, conduct and reporting of phenomenographic research , 2000 .

[35]  C. Berterö,et al.  How next of kin experience palliative care of relatives at home. , 2003, European journal of cancer care.

[36]  A. Dreyer,et al.  Sedation of ventilated patients in intensive care units: relatives' experiences. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[37]  E. Danielson,et al.  Patients' experiences of long-term oxygen therapy. , 1997, Journal of advanced nursing.

[38]  B. Ternestedt,et al.  Involvement of relatives in the care of the dying in different care cultures: involvement in the dark or in the light? , 1998, Cancer nursing.

[39]  M. Bédard,et al.  Caregiving and its impact on families of the terminally ill , 2003, Aging & mental health.

[40]  Ciro Augusto Floriani Cuidados paliativos no domicílio: desafios aos cuidados de crianças dependentes de tecnologia , 2010 .