Beyond RAMS Design: Towards an Integral Asset and Process Approach

The lifespan to which assets can be efficiently maintained, upgraded or disposed, heavily depends on the characteristics designed into the asset in the design phase. RAMS analysis is a well-established approach often used to reach this target. This approach is however not adequate for handling the complexity of changes and demands placed on nowadays assets. This can lead to reduced performance and unnecessary risk taking. There is a need for a more integral RAMS(SHEEP) perspective including Supportability, Health, Environment, Economics and Politics. Additionally there is often only focused on the asset itself and not on processes supporting the maintenance of an asset. Therefore this chapter does not only give a historic overview on RAMS evolvement, but also aims at answering how the supporting processes can be designed from an integral RAMSSHEEP perspective. We illustrate this by analysing the functional requirements for the Toilet System (TS) of the Sprinter Light Train (SLT).

[1]  Y. Asiedu,et al.  Product life cycle cost analysis: State of the art review , 1998 .

[2]  Uday Kumar,et al.  Integration of RAMS and risk analysis in product design and development work processes , 2003 .

[3]  Shad Dowlatshahi,et al.  Product design in a concurrent engineering environment : an optimization approach , 1992 .

[4]  D. Kececioglu Reliability education: A historical perspective , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[5]  A. Martinetti,et al.  Operation, safety and human: Critical factors for the success of railway transportation , 2016, 2016 11th System of Systems Engineering Conference (SoSE).

[6]  Sami Kara,et al.  Toward integrated product and process life cycle planning—An environmental perspective , 2012 .

[7]  Dimitri Kececioglu,et al.  Reliability engineering handbook , 1991 .

[8]  Michael Todinov,et al.  Reliability and Risk Models: Setting Reliability Requirements , 2005 .

[9]  Frans Kokkeler,et al.  Design for maintenance: guidelines to enhance maintainability, reliability and supportability of industrial products , 2012 .

[10]  Leonardus Adriana Maria van Dongen Through-Life Engineering Services: The NedTrain Case , 2015 .

[11]  Yash P. Gupta,et al.  Twenty‐Five Years of Life Cycle Costing — Theory and Applications: A Survey , 1985 .

[12]  Leonardus Adriana Maria van Dongen,et al.  Understanding Maintenance Decisions: How to Support Acquisition of Capital Assets , 2015 .

[13]  Mario Patrucco,et al.  Information, formation and training for the maintenance operations: the lesson learned from fatal accidents , 2013 .

[14]  Richard Jacob Ruitenburg,et al.  Asset life cycle plans: twelve steps to assist strategic decision-making in asset life cycle management , 2017 .

[15]  Un Environment Inclusive Green EconomyResources,et al.  Towards a Green Economy Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication, Conclusion , 2017 .

[16]  Alan C. Brent,et al.  Asset life cycle management : towards improving physical asset performance in the process industry , 2005 .