Selection Criteria for the Analysis of Data-Driven Clusters in Cerebral fMRI

Functional MRI (fMRI) may be possible without a priori models of the cerebral hemodynamic response. First, such data-driven fMRI requires that all cerebral territories with distinct patterns be identified. Second, a systematic selection method is necessary to prevent the subjective interpretation of the identified territories. This paper addresses the second point by proposing a novel method for the automated interpretation of identified territories in data-driven fMRI. Selection criteria are formulated using: 1) the temporal cross-correlation between each identified territory and the paradigm and 2) the spatial contiguity of the corresponding voxel map. Ten event-design fMRI data sets are analyzed with one prominent algorithm, fuzzy c-means clustering, before applying the selection criteria. For comparison, these data are also analyzed with an established, model-based method: statistical parametric mapping. Both methods produced similar results and identified potential activation in the expected territory of the sensorimotor cortex in all ten data sets. Moreover, the proposed method classified distinct territories in separate clusters. Selected clusters have a mean temporal correlation coefficient of 0.39 plusmn0.07 ( n = 19) with a mean 2.7 plusmn1.4 second response delay. At most, four separate contiguous territories were observed in 87% of these clusters. These results suggest that the proposed method may be effective for exploratory fMRI studies where the hemodynamic response is perturbed during cerebrovascular disease.

[1]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  A quantitative comparison of functional MRI cluster analysis , 2004, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[2]  Mohamed-Jalal Fadili,et al.  On the number of clusters and the fuzziness index for unsupervised FCA application to BOLD fMRI time series , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[3]  D. C. Howell Statistical methods for psychology, 3rd ed. , 1992 .

[4]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[5]  W. Kuschinsky,et al.  Regulation of Cerebral Blood Flow , 2000 .

[6]  L. Shah,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2010, Seminars in roentgenology.

[7]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[8]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[9]  S. Ruan,et al.  A multistep Unsupervised Fuzzy Clustering Analysis of fMRI time series , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[10]  G. Ascoli,et al.  Computational Neuroanatomy , 2002, Humana Press.

[11]  M. Burke,et al.  BOLD response during uncoupling of neuronal activity and CBF , 2006, NeuroImage.

[12]  Clifford R. Jack,et al.  Functional Inferences Vary with the Method of Analysis in fMRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[13]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  On Clustering fMRI Time Series , 1999, NeuroImage.

[14]  J. Dunn Some Recent Investigations of a New Fuzzy Partitioning Algorithm and its Application to Pattern Classification Problems , 1974 .

[15]  C. Iadecola,et al.  Neurovascular coupling in the normal brain and in hypertension, stroke, and Alzheimer disease. , 2006, Journal of applied physiology.

[16]  Yul-Wan Sung,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, Scholarpedia.

[17]  Kai-Hsiang Chuang,et al.  Model-free functional MRI analysis using Kohonen clustering neural network and fuzzy C-means , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  P. Boesiger,et al.  A new correlation‐based fuzzy logic clustering algorithm for FMRI , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Yadong Wang,et al.  Improving fuzzy c-means clustering based on feature-weight learning , 2004, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[20]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[21]  Anke Meyer-Bäse,et al.  Comparison of two exploratory data analysis methods for fMRI: unsupervised clustering versus independent component analysis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[22]  Herbert Witte,et al.  How to Avoid Spurious Cluster Validation? A Methodological Investigation on Simulated and fMRI Data , 2002, NeuroImage.

[23]  Ray L. Somorjai,et al.  Exploring regions of interest with cluster analysis (EROICA) using a spectral peak statistic for selecting and testing the significance of fMRI activation time-series , 2002, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[24]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[25]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms , 1981, Advanced Applications in Pattern Recognition.

[26]  R. Buxton,et al.  Modeling the hemodynamic response to brain activation , 2004, NeuroImage.