Sensor noise effects on signal-level image fusion performance

The aim of this paper is twofold: (i) to define appropriate metrics which measure the effects of input sensor noise on the performance of signal-level image fusion systems and (ii) to employ these metrics in a comparative study of the robustness of typical image fusion schemes whose inputs are corrupted with noise. Thus system performance metrics for measuring both absolute and relative degradation in fused image quality are proposed when fusing noisy input modalities. A third metric, which considers fusion of noise patterns, is also developed and used to evaluate the perceptual effect of noise corrupting homogenous image regions (i.e. areas with no salient features). These metrics are employed to compare the performance of different image fusion methodologies and feature selection/information fusion strategies operating under noisy input conditions. Altogether, the performance of seventeen fusion schemes is examined and their robustness to noise considered at various input signal-to-noise ratio values for three types of sensor noise characteristics.

[1]  Christine Pohl,et al.  Multisensor image fusion in remote sensing: concepts, methods and applications , 1998 .

[2]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Morphological filters and wavelet-based image fusion for concealed weapons detection , 1998, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[3]  Laure J. Chipman,et al.  Wavelets and image fusion , 1995, Proceedings., International Conference on Image Processing.

[4]  Gary Waldman,et al.  Electro-Optical Systems Performance Modeling , 1992 .

[5]  D. R. Lamb,et al.  Charge-coupled devices and their applications , 1980 .

[6]  W. Hendee The Perception of Visual Information , 1993, Springer New York.

[7]  Glenn Healey,et al.  Radiometric CCD camera calibration and noise estimation , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  Peter J. Burt,et al.  Enhanced image capture through fusion , 1993, 1993 (4th) International Conference on Computer Vision.

[9]  D. J. Burt,et al.  Charge-coupled devices and their applications , 1975 .

[10]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Vladimir S. Petrovic,et al.  Objective pixel-level image fusion performance measure , 2000, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[12]  Vladimir Petrovic,et al.  Objective image fusion performance measure , 2000 .

[13]  Rick S. Blum,et al.  A categorization of multiscale-decomposition-based image fusion schemes with a performance study for a digital camera application , 1999, Proc. IEEE.

[14]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  Multisensor Image Fusion Using the Wavelet Transform , 1995, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[15]  Alexander Akerman,et al.  Pyramidal techniques for multisensor fusion , 1992, Other Conferences.

[16]  T. S. Lomheim,et al.  General noise processes in hybrid infrared focal plane arrays , 1991 .

[17]  Alison M. Fairhurst Method of predicting the probability of human observers recognizing targets in simulated thermal images , 1998 .

[18]  Alexander Toet,et al.  Hierarchical image fusion , 1990, Machine Vision and Applications.

[19]  Richard R. Brooks,et al.  Atmospheric attenuation reduction through multisensor fusion , 1998, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[20]  A Frenkel,et al.  Photon-noise-limited operation of intensified CCD cameras. , 1997, Applied optics.

[21]  Vladimir Petrovic,et al.  Cross-band pixel selection in multiresolution image fusion , 1999, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[22]  Ravi K. Sharma,et al.  Multistream video fusion using local principal components analysis , 1998, Optics & Photonics.

[23]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Image Processing, Analysis and Machine Vision , 1993, Springer US.

[24]  Ingemar J. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Camera Noise , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[25]  Ravi K. Sharma Multi stream video fusion using local principal components analysis , 1998 .