Study protocol: The DAICY trial—dual versus single-antibiotic impregnated cement in primary hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture—a register-based cluster-randomized crossover-controlled trial

Background and purpose Older patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) are often treated with a cemented primary hemiarthroplasty (HA). The DAICY trial investigates whether high-dose dual-impregnated antibiotic-loaded cement (DIAC) including gentamicin and clindamycin can reduce the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in comparison with low-dose single-impregnated gentamicin antibiotic-loaded cement (SIAC), in patients ≥ 60 years treated with a cemented HA for a displaced FNF. Study design The trial is a national, multicenter, register-based, cluster-randomized, crossover trial. Patients ≥ 60 years with a non-pathological, displaced FNF (Type Garden 3–4/AO 31-B2 or B3) suitable for HA according to local guidelines are eligible for inclusion. Participating orthopedic departments will be randomized to start with either SIAC (control group) or DIAC treatment (intervention group) for 2 years. After 2 years, the study departments will then change to the other treatment arm for the remaining 2 years of the study. Approximately 7,000 patients will be included. The study is pragmatic in that the choice of implant brands, surgical approach and peri- and postoperative protocols follow the local routines of each participating department. All outcome variables will be retrieved after linkage of the study cohort to the following Swedish registers: the Fracture Register, the Arthroplasty Register, the National Patient Register and the Prescribed Drug Registry Outcome The primary outcome will be periprosthetic joint infection of the index joint within 1 year after surgery. Secondary outcomes will be any reoperation on the index joint, mortality within 90 days and 1 year, resistance patterns of causative bacteria in cases of PJI, and health economics. Potential added value This trial is designed to support or refute the efficacy of DIAC used in patients with a displaced FNF, potentially reducing PJI and resource allocation. Start of the trial and estimated duration The DAICY trial started recruiting patients in January 2022 and will continue recruiting for approximately 4 years. Complete follow-up expected in 5 years.

[1]  N. Hailer,et al.  The Swedish Fracture Register – ten years of experience and 600,000 fractures collected in a National Quality Register , 2022, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[2]  J. Achten,et al.  Cemented or Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Intracapsular Hip Fracture. , 2022, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  S. Overgaard,et al.  Risk of mortality and reoperation in hip fracture patients undergoing cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty : a population-based study from Danish National Registries. , 2022, The bone & joint journal.

[4]  A. Sayed-Noor,et al.  Epidemiology, classification, treatment, and mortality of adult femoral neck and basicervical fractures: an observational study of 40,049 fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register , 2021, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[5]  Matthew L. Costa,et al.  A randomized clinical trial of low dose single antibiotic-loaded cement versus high dose dual antibiotic-loaded cement in patients receiving a hip hemiarthroplasty after fracture: A protocol for the WHiTE 8 COPAL study , 2021, Bone & joint open.

[6]  M. Parker,et al.  Cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures of the hip: a randomized trial of 400 patients. , 2020, The bone & joint journal.

[7]  Jin Zhang,et al.  Antibiotic-impregnated bone cement for preventing infection in patients receiving primary total hip and knee arthroplasty , 2019, Medicine.

[8]  M. Möller,et al.  Femoral fracture classification in the Swedish Fracture Register – a validity study , 2019, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[9]  A. Stark,et al.  HOPE-Trial: Hemiarthroplasty Compared with Total Hip Arthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Octogenarians , 2019, JB & JS open access.

[10]  A. Sanzone,et al.  Management of Acute Hip Fracture. , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  M. Reed,et al.  Antibiotic resistance profiles of deep surgical site infections in hip hemiarthroplasty; comparing low dose single antibiotic versus high dose dual antibiotic impregnated cement , 2018, Journal of bone and joint infection.

[12]  F. Frihagen,et al.  Prosthetic joint infection—a devastating complication of hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture , 2017, Acta orthopaedica.

[13]  T. Eisler,et al.  Early Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention in Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture , 2017, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[14]  R. Keogh,et al.  Choosing appropriate analysis methods for cluster randomised cross‐over trials with a binary outcome , 2016, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  O. Sköldenberg,et al.  Substantially higher prevalence of postoperative periprosthetic fractures in octogenarians with hip fractures operated with a cemented, polished tapered stem rather than an anatomic stem , 2016, Acta orthopaedica.

[16]  T. Noailles,et al.  What are the risk factors for post-operative infection after hip hemiarthroplasty? Systematic review of literature , 2016, International Orthopaedics.

[17]  M. Möller,et al.  The Swedish fracture register: 103,000 fractures registered , 2015, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[18]  Michael C. Mosier,et al.  Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Antibiotics and Antiseptics for Preventing Infection in People Receiving Primary Total Hip and Knee Prostheses , 2015, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[19]  R. Bellomo,et al.  Cluster randomised crossover trials with binary data and unbalanced cluster sizes: Application to studies of near-universal interventions in intensive care , 2015, Clinical trials.

[20]  P. Wretenberg,et al.  Validation of reoperations due to infection in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register , 2014, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[21]  J. Ludvigsson,et al.  External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register , 2011, BMC public health.

[22]  C. Moran,et al.  Early infection after hip fracture surgery: risk factors, costs and outcome. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[23]  J. V. van Horn,et al.  Copal Bone Cement Is More Effective in Preventing Biofilm Formation than Palacos R-G , 2008, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  D. Bouchier‐Hayes,et al.  Development of resistant strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis on gentamicin-loaded bone cement in vivo. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.