Electrical Conductivities of the Freshly Excised Cerebral Cortex in Epilepsy Surgery Patients; Correlation with Pathology, Seizure Duration, and Diffusion Tensor Imaging

SummaryThe electrical conductivities (σ) of freshly excised neocortex and subcortical white matter were studied in the frequency range of physiological relevance for EEG (5–1005 Hz) in 21 patients (ages 0.67 to 55 years) undergoing epilepsy neurosurgery. Surgical patients were classified as having cortical dysplasia (CD) or non-CD pathologies. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) was obtained in 9 patients. Results found that electrical conductivities in freshly excised neocortex vary significantly from patient to patient (σ = 0.0660–0.156 S/m). Cerebral cortex from CD patients had increased conductivities compared with non-CD cases. In addition, longer seizure durations positively correlated with conductivities for CD tissue, while they negatively correlated for non-CD tissue. DTI ADC eigenvalues inversely correlated with electrical conductivity in CD and non-CD tissue. These results in a small initial cohort indicate that electrical conductivity of freshly excised neocortex from epilepsy surgery patients varies as a consequence of clinical variables, such as underlying pathology and seizure duration, and inversely correlates with DTI ADC values. Understanding how disease affects cortical electrical conductivity and ways to non-invasively measure it, perhaps through DTI, could enhance the ability to localize EEG dipoles and other relevant information in the treatment of epilepsy surgery patients.

[1]  Sylvain Baillet,et al.  Influence of skull anisotropy for the forward and inverse problem in EEG: Simulation studies using FEM on realistic head models , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[2]  J. Haueisen,et al.  Influence of tissue resistivities on neuromagnetic fields and electric potentials studied with a finite element model of the head , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  H P Schwan,et al.  ELECTRODE POLARIZATION IMPEDANCE AND MEASUREMENTS IN BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS * , 1968, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[4]  J S Ebersole,et al.  Non-invasive pre-surgical evaluation with EEG/MEG source analysis. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[5]  Carlos H. Muravchik,et al.  Estimating brain conductivities and dipole source signals with EEG arrays , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  S Ueno,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of mean values and anisotropy of electrical conductivity in the human brain. , 2004, Neurology & clinical neurophysiology : NCN.

[7]  P. Nunez,et al.  Electric fields of the brain , 1981 .

[8]  V Diekmann,et al.  Localisation of epileptic foci with electric, magnetic and combined electromagnetic models. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  G. Mathern,et al.  Postoperative Seizure Control and Antiepileptic Drug Use in Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery Patients: The UCLA Experience, 1986–1997 , 1999, Epilepsia.

[10]  D.R. Jackson,et al.  Effect of conductivity uncertainties and modeling errors on EEG source localization using a 2-D model , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Combined mapping of human auditory EEG and MEG responses. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  Y. Okada,et al.  Experimental analysis of distortion of magnetoencephalography signals by the skull , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  David R. Wozny,et al.  The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Paolo Inchingolo,et al.  Improving Lesion Conductivity Estimate by Means of EEG Source Localization Sensitivity to Model Parameter , 2002, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[15]  L. Geddes,et al.  The specific resistance of biological material—A compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist , 1967, Medical and biological engineering.

[16]  M. Peters,et al.  Volume conduction effects in EEG and MEG. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  M. Fuchs,et al.  An improved boundary element method for realistic volume-conductor modeling , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  J. Haueisen,et al.  The Influence of Brain Tissue Anisotropy on Human EEG and MEG , 2002, NeuroImage.

[19]  C. E. Acar,et al.  Sensitivity of EEG and MEG measurements to tissue conductivity , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  T. Cloughesy,et al.  Inverse correlation between choline magnetic resonance spectroscopy signal intensity and the apparent diffusion coefficient in human glioma , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  L. Garnero,et al.  Combined MEG and EEG source imaging by minimization of mutual information , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  S. K. Law,et al.  Thickness and resistivity variations over the upper surface of the human skull , 2005, Brain Topography.

[23]  Leonid Zhukov,et al.  Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic Simulations using realistic head models , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  J. Haueisen,et al.  The Influence of Conductivity Changes in Boundary Element Compartments on the Forward and Inverse Problem in Electroencephalography and Magnetoencephalography - Der Einfluß der Änderung der Schalenleitfähigkeit bei Randelementemodellen auf die Vorwärtsrechnung und das inverse Problem in Elektroenzep , 1999, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[25]  J P Kaipio,et al.  Effects of local skull inhomogeneities on EEG source estimation. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[26]  H. Buchner,et al.  The influence of skull-conductivity misspecification on inverse source localization in realistically shaped finite element head models , 2005, Brain Topography.

[27]  C Gabriel,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  P. Nunez,et al.  Neocortical Dynamics and Human EEG Rhythms , 1995 .

[29]  A. Dale,et al.  Conductivity tensor mapping of the human brain using diffusion tensor MRI , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Georg Neubauer,et al.  Dielectric properties of porcine brain tissue in the transition from life to death at frequencies from 800 to 1900 MHz , 2003, Bioelectromagnetics.

[31]  M. Hämäläinen,et al.  Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  M Wagner,et al.  Improving source reconstructions by combining bioelectric and biomagnetic data. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[33]  C. Gabriel.  Dielectric properties of biological tissue: Variation with age , 2005, Bioelectromagnetics.

[34]  E. Harth,et al.  Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of Eeg , 2005 .

[35]  Georg Neubauer,et al.  Dielectric properties of human brain tissue measured less than 10 h postmortem at frequencies from 800 to 2450 MHz , 2003, Bioelectromagnetics.

[36]  M. Peters,et al.  The volume conductor may act as a temporal filter on the ECG and EEG , 1998, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.