Respiratory protection against airborne nanoparticles: a review

As a precautionary measure, it is often recommended that workers take steps to reduce their exposure to airborne nanoparticles through the use of respiratory protective devices. The purpose of this study was to provide a review and analysis of the research literature and current recommendations on respirators used for protection against nanoparticles. Key research findings were that studies with particles as small as 4 nm have shown that conventional single-fiber filtration theory can be used to describe the filtration performance of respirators and that the most penetrating particle size for respirators equipped with commonly used electrostatic filter media is in the range of 30–100 nm. Future research needs include human laboratory and workplace protection factor studies to measure the respirator total inward leakage of nanoparticles. Industrial hygienists and safety professionals should continue to use traditional respirator selection guidance for workers exposed to nanoparticles.

[1]  Sheng-Hsiu Huang,et al.  Penetration of 4.5nm to aerosol particles through fibrous filters , 2007 .

[2]  K Willeke,et al.  Characteristics of face seal leakage in filtering facepieces. , 1992, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[3]  Samy Rengasamy,et al.  Filtration Performance of NIOSH-Approved N95 and P100 Filtering Facepiece Respirators Against 4 to 30 Nanometer-Size Nanoparticles , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[4]  Robert Weber,et al.  The Effect of Pressure Drop on Respirator Faceseal Leakage , 2005, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[5]  W C Hinds,et al.  Performance of dust respirators with facial seal leaks: I. Experimental. , 1987, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[6]  D L Campbell,et al.  Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part II--Method comparison testing. , 1998, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[7]  P. D. Gardner,et al.  N95 and P100 Respirator Filter Efficiency Under High Constant and Cyclic Flow , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[8]  D. Pui,et al.  Experimental study of nanoparticles penetration through commercial filter media , 2006 .

[9]  Samy Rengasamy,et al.  Nanoparticle Filtration Performance of Commercially Available Dust Masks. , 2008, Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection.

[10]  Paul Schulte,et al.  Occupational Risk Management of Engineered Nanoparticles , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[11]  Tiina Reponen,et al.  Manikin-based performance evaluation of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators challenged with nanoparticles. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[12]  R. Shaffer,et al.  Comparison of nanoparticle filtration performance of NIOSH-approved and CE-marked particulate filtering facepiece respirators. , 2009, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[13]  Tiina Reponen,et al.  Respiratory Performance Offered by N95 Respirators and Surgical Masks: Human Subject Evaluation with NaCl Aerosol Representing Bacterial and Viral Particle Size Range , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[14]  E. Moyer,et al.  Electrostatic respirator filter media: filter efficiency and most penetrating particle size effects. , 2000, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[15]  K Willeke,et al.  Particle size-dependent leakage and losses of aerosols in respirators. , 1987, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[16]  Jeanne Bidwell,et al.  Performance of a Full Facepiece, Air-Purifying Respirator Against Lead Aerosols in a Workplace Environment , 2007, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[17]  Tiina Reponen,et al.  Filter Performance of N99 and N95 Facepiece Respirators Against Viruses and Ultrafine Particles , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[18]  Leonard W. Barrett,et al.  Aerosol Loading Performance of Electret Filter Media , 1998 .

[19]  Larry L Janssen,et al.  Workplace Protection Factors for an N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirator , 2007, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[20]  T Myojo,et al.  Variation in quantitative respirator fit factors due to fluctuations in leak size during fit testing. , 1994, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[21]  T. Reponen,et al.  What Does Respirator Certification Tell Us About Filtration of Ultrafine Particles? , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[22]  M. Heinemann,et al.  Guidance for handling and use of nanomaterials at the workplace , 2009, Human & experimental toxicology.

[23]  K. Okuyama,et al.  Filtration efficiency of a fibrous filter for nanoparticles , 2006 .

[24]  Jörg Meyer,et al.  Filtration Efficiency of Aerosol Particles Below 20 Nanometers , 2005 .