Multiplayer Cost Games with Simple Nash Equilibria

Multiplayer games with selfish agents naturally occur in the design of distributed and embedded systems. As the goals of selfish agents are usually neither equivalent nor antagonistic to each other, such games are non zero-sum games. We study such games and show that a large class of these games, including games where the individual objectives are mean- or discounted-payoff, or quantitative reachability, and show that they do not only have a solution, but a simple solution. We establish the existence of Nash equilibria that are composed of k memoryless strategies for each agent in a setting with k agents, one main and k − 1 minor strategies. The main strategy describes what happens when all agents comply, whereas the minor strategies ensure that all other agents immediately start to co-operate against the agent who first deviates from the plan. This simplicity is important, as rational agents are an idealisation. Realistically, agents have to decide on their moves with very limited resources, and complicated strategies that require exponential—or even non-elementary—implementations cannot realistically be implemented. The existence of simple strategies that we prove in this paper therefore holds a promise of implementability.

[1]  Wolfgang Thomas,et al.  Church's Problem and a Tour through Automata Theory , 2008, Pillars of Computer Science.

[2]  Stephan Merz,et al.  Model Checking , 2000 .

[3]  Rajeev Alur,et al.  Ranking Automata and Games for Prioritized Requirements , 2008, CAV.

[4]  Krishnendu Chatterjee,et al.  Better Quality in Synthesis through Quantitative Objectives , 2009, CAV.

[5]  Patricia Bouyer,et al.  Nash Equilibria for Reachability Objectives in Multi-player Timed Games , 2010, CONCUR.

[6]  Kim G. Larsen,et al.  Nash Equilibria in Concurrent Priced Games , 2012, LATA.

[7]  Jeffrey D. Ullman,et al.  Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages and Computation , 1979 .

[8]  Martin Zimmermann,et al.  Cost-Parity and Cost-Streett Games , 2012, FSTTCS.

[9]  J. Nash Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games. , 1950, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Ashutosh Trivedi,et al.  Competative optimisation on timed automata , 2009 .

[11]  Krishnendu Chatterjee,et al.  Mean-payoff parity games , 2005, 20th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS' 05).

[12]  J. Filar,et al.  Competitive Markov Decision Processes , 1996 .

[13]  Martin Zimmermann Time-Optimal Winning Strategies for Poset Games , 2009, CIAA.

[14]  Krishnendu Chatterjee,et al.  Finitary winning in w-regular games , 2006 .

[15]  Vladimir Gurvich,et al.  Why Chess and Backgammon can be solved in pure positional uniformly optimal strategies , 2009 .

[16]  Florian Horn,et al.  Optimal strategy synthesis for request-response games , 2015, RAIRO Theor. Informatics Appl..

[17]  Krishnendu Chatterjee,et al.  Finitary Winning in omega-Regular Games , 2006, TACAS.

[18]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .

[19]  Véronique Bruyère,et al.  On Equilibria in Quantitative Games with Reachability/Safety Objectives , 2013, Theory of Computing Systems.

[20]  Frank Thuijsman,et al.  Perfect information stochastic games and related classes , 1997, Int. J. Game Theory.

[21]  Kim G. Larsen,et al.  Infinite Runs in Weighted Timed Automata with Energy Constraints , 2008, FORMATS.

[22]  Thomas Wilke,et al.  Automata Logics, and Infinite Games , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[23]  Michael Ummels,et al.  Solution Concepts and Algorithms for Infinite Multiplayer Games , 2008 .

[24]  Wolfgang Thomas,et al.  On the Synthesis of Strategies in Infinite Games , 1995, STACS.

[25]  Soumya Paul,et al.  Nash Equilibrium in Generalised Muller Games , 2009, FSTTCS.

[26]  Patricia Bouyer,et al.  Nash Equilibria in Concurrent Games with Büchi Objectives , 2011, FSTTCS.

[27]  Véronique Bruyère,et al.  Equilibria in Quantitative Reachability Games , 2010, CSR.

[28]  Véronique Bruyère,et al.  Subgame Perfection for Equilibria in Quantitative Reachability Games , 2012, FoSSaCS.

[29]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[30]  Florian Horn,et al.  Optimal Strategy Synthesis in Request-Response Games , 2008, ATVA.