Applying Bioaffordances through an Inquiry-Based Model: A Literature Review of Interactive Biodesign

ABSTRACT The nascent field of biodesign creates novel applications of life sciences through design methods. Biodesign has the potential to shift interactive computational systems from using purely digital components to systems that integrate living organisms. However, there is a lack of understanding of biodesign and how it advances HCI. We present a review of 41 papers published in ACM Digital Library, IEEE Explore digital library and the Design and Applied Arts Index. We found that existing literature describes aspects of biodesign theory, design processes and artifacts, and educational environments, but not holistically. Based on the findings, we define biodesign as the application of the bioaffordances of an organism. We contribute the Bio-Inquiry model: a methodology connecting user-centered, scientific and critical inquiries to inform the design of interactive artifacts. We discuss the opportunities at the intersection of biodesign and HCI to consider the nature of future technologies.

[1]  Tom Igoe,et al.  Physical computing: sensing and controlling the physical world with computers , 2004 .

[2]  Sebastian Risi,et al.  Flora Robotica - Mixed Societies of Symbiotic Robot-Plant Bio-Hybrids , 2015, 2015 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence.

[3]  Hiroya Tanaka,et al.  I/O plant: a tool kit for designing augmented human-plant interactions , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[4]  Joseph Lindley,et al.  More-Than Human Centred Design: Considering Other Things , 2019, The Design Journal.

[5]  S. Z. M. Hashim,et al.  The emerging field of synthetic biology: A review , 2012, 2012 4th International Conference on Intelligent and Advanced Systems (ICIAS2012).

[6]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Radical atoms: beyond tangible bits, toward transformable materials , 2012, INTR.

[7]  Hiroya Tanaka,et al.  Botanical interface design -creative kits, tools, and methods- , 2007 .

[8]  M. Ansaldi,et al.  Phage-Based Fluorescent Biosensor Prototypes to Specifically Detect Enteric Bacteria Such as E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium , 2015, PloS one.

[9]  Karina G. Samuel-Gama,et al.  Prototyping Biotic Games and Interactive Experiments with JavaScript , 2018, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[10]  Svenja Keune Co–designing with plants. Degrading as an overlooked potential for interior aesthetics based on textile structures , 2017 .

[11]  Nicoletta Adamo-Villani,et al.  Enhancing creativity in synthetic biology with Interactive Virtual Environments , 2009, 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.

[12]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Learning Functional Models of Biological Systems for Biologically Inspired Design , 2011, 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[13]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  Legitimacy, boundary objects & participation in transnational DIY biology , 2016, PDC.

[14]  William W. Gaver Technology affordances , 1991, CHI.

[15]  Julia Kluge Design For The 21st Century , 2016 .

[16]  Josh Bongard,et al.  A scalable pipeline for designing reconfigurable organisms , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Connor Dickie,et al.  A biological imperative for interaction design , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[18]  Feng Zhang,et al.  Genome engineering using CRISPR-Cas9 system. , 2015, Methods in molecular biology.

[19]  Elvin Karana,et al.  Material Driven Design (MDD): A Method to Design for Material Experiences , 2015 .

[20]  Brie Tripp,et al.  A Framework to Guide Undergraduate Education in Interdisciplinary Science , 2019, CBE life sciences education.

[21]  Orit Shaer,et al.  BacPack: Exploring the Role of Tangibles in a Museum Exhibit for Bio-Design , 2017, TEI.

[22]  Orit Shaer,et al.  Designing reality-based interfaces for experiential bio-design , 2013, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[23]  Carole Collet,et al.  Grow-Made Textiles , 2017 .

[24]  Pat Pataranutaporn,et al.  Hack Biodesign: An Integrative STEAM Education Platform for Biology, Engineering, and Design , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE).

[25]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[26]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  (DIY)biology and opportunities for HCI , 2012, DIS '12.

[27]  Elvin Karana,et al.  When the Material Grows: A Case Study on Designing (with) Mycelium-Based Materials , 2018 .

[28]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom‐Based Practices , 2005 .

[29]  A. Bakker,et al.  Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects , 2011 .

[30]  Andrey Koucheryavy,et al.  Live substance in cyberspace — Biodriver system , 2016, 2016 18th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT).

[31]  Yasha Jacob Grobman,et al.  Implementing bio-design tools to develop mycelium-based products , 2019 .

[32]  Caroline Hummels,et al.  Radical clashes: what tangible interaction is made of , 2013, TEI '13.

[33]  Anton Vrieling,et al.  Preparing for an interdisciplinary future: A perspective from early-career researchers § , 2013 .

[34]  Akira Wakita,et al.  PlantDisplay: turning houseplants into ambient display , 2006, ACE '06.

[35]  Seung Ah Lee,et al.  MicroAquarium: An Immersive and Interactive Installation with Living Microorganisms , 2020, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[36]  S. Pedell,et al.  Co-creating and Assessing Future Wellbeing Technology Using Design Fiction , 2019, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation.

[37]  Martin Tomitsch,et al.  Design. Think. Make. Break. Repeat.: A Handbook of Methods , 2018 .

[38]  C. Vickers The minimal genome comes of age , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[39]  Bruce M. Tharp,et al.  Discursive Design , 2019 .

[40]  Raymond A. Willem,et al.  Design and Science , 1990 .

[41]  Toufic Haidamous,et al.  Rethinking the Role of Design within the Technological Advancements in Biomimetics and SynBio , 2017 .

[42]  Glenda Amayo Caldwell,et al.  More-than-Human Media Architecture , 2018, MAB.

[43]  Foad Hamidi,et al.  Living media interfaces: a multi-perspective analysis of biological materials for interaction , 2020, Digit. Creativity.

[44]  D. S. Kong,et al.  Community driven design of living technologies , 2018, PDC.

[45]  E. Giaccardi,et al.  Alive. Active. Adaptive: Experiential Knowledge and Emerging Materials , 2019 .

[46]  Larissa Pschetz,et al.  The Nature of Biodesigned Systems: Directions for HCI , 2020, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[47]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Growing Designs with biomakerlab in High School Classrooms , 2017, IDC.

[48]  Jennifer L. Osterhage,et al.  Opportunities for Self-Evaluation Increase Student Calibration in an Introductory Biology Course , 2019, CBE life sciences education.

[49]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Hybrid Living Materials: Digital Design and Fabrication of 3D Multimaterial Structures with Programmable Biohybrid Surfaces , 2019, Advanced Functional Materials.

[50]  Karl Sims,et al.  Evolving virtual creatures , 1994, SIGGRAPH.

[51]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  At the seams: DIYbio and opportunities for HCI , 2012, DIS '12.

[52]  Stacey Kuznetsov,et al.  Antibiotic-responsive bioart , 2018, Interactions.

[53]  Elvin Karana,et al.  Fabricating materials from living organisms: An emerging design practice , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[54]  Angharad Evans,et al.  Rising influence of synthetic biology in regenerative medicine , 2017 .

[55]  Orit Shaer,et al.  BacPack for New Frontiers: A Tangible Tabletop Museum Exhibit Exploring Synthetic Biology , 2016, ISS.

[56]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Speculating on Biodesign in the Future Home , 2021, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[57]  W. Srubar Engineered Living Materials: Taxonomies and Emerging Trends. , 2020, Trends in biotechnology.

[58]  Orit Shaer,et al.  MoClo planner: Interactive visualization for Modular Cloning bio-design , 2013, 2013 IEEE Symposium on Biological Data Visualization (BioVis).

[59]  Lars Erik Holmquist,et al.  Between aesthetics and utility: designing ambient information visualizations , 2003, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2003 (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8714).

[60]  S. Bhattarai,et al.  Engineered phage-based therapeutic materials inhibit Chlamydia trachomatis intracellular infection. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[61]  Oren Zuckerman,et al.  OpenLH: Open Liquid-Handling System for Creative Experimentation with Biology , 2019, TEI.

[62]  Orit Shaer,et al.  MoClo planner: supporting innovation in bio-design through multi-touch interaction , 2012, ITS '12.

[63]  Harpreet Sareen,et al.  Cyborg Botany: Exploring In-Planta Cybernetic Systems for Interaction , 2019, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[64]  Elisa Giaccardi,et al.  Technology and More-Than-Human Design , 2020, Design Issues.

[65]  Gregory L Herr Biodesign: the process of innovating medical technologies. , 2010, Biomedical instrumentation & technology.

[66]  Stefan Poslad,et al.  Working with Nature's Lag: Initial Design Lessons for Slow Biotic Games , 2020, FDG.

[67]  Adam J. Meyer,et al.  Hachimoji DNA and RNA: A genetic system with eight building blocks , 2019, Science.

[68]  Chris J. Myers,et al.  Computational Synthetic Biology: Progress and the Road Ahead , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Multi-Scale Computing Systems.

[69]  Pat Pataranutaporn,et al.  Toward Growable Robot : Exploring and Integrating Flexible – Biological Matter with Electronics , 2018, 2018 International Flexible Electronics Technology Conference (IFETC).