Aerodynamic Models for the Low Density Supersonic Declerator (LDSD) Supersonic Flight Dynamics Test (SFDT)

An overview of pre-flight aerodynamic models for the Low Density Supersonic Decelerator (LDSD) Supersonic Flight Dynamics Test (SFDT) campaign is presented, with comparisons to reconstructed flight data and discussion of model updates. The SFDT campaign objective is to test Supersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (SIAD) and large supersonic parachute technologies at high altitude Earth conditions relevant to entry, descent, and landing (EDL) at Mars. Nominal SIAD test conditions are attained by lifting a test vehicle (TV) to 36 km altitude with a large helium balloon, then accelerating the TV to Mach 4 and and 53 km altitude with a solid rocket motor. The first flight test (SFDT-1) delivered a 6 meter diameter robotic mission class decelerator (SIAD-R) to several seconds of flight on June 28, 2014, and was successful in demonstrating the SFDT flight system concept and SIAD-R. The trajectory was off-nominal, however, lofting to over 8 km higher than predicted in flight simulations. Comparisons between reconstructed flight data and aerodynamic models show that SIAD-R aerodynamic performance was in good agreement with pre-flight predictions. Similar comparisons of powered ascent phase aerodynamics show that the pre-flight model overpredicted TV pitch stability, leading to underprediction of trajectory peak altitude. Comparisons between pre-flight aerodynamic models and reconstructed flight data are shown, and changes to aerodynamic models using improved fidelity and knowledge gained from SFDT-1 are discussed.

[1]  Ian G. Clark,et al.  Development and Testing of a New Family of Supersonic Decelerators , 2013 .

[2]  Soumyo Dutta,et al.  Supersonic Flight Dynamics Test 1 - Post-Flight Assessment of Simulation Performance , 2015 .

[3]  Henry S. Wright,et al.  Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (HIAD) Technology Development Overview , 2011 .

[4]  Christopher D. Karlgaard,et al.  Assessment of the Reconstructed Aerodynamics of the Mars Science Laboratory Entry Vehicle , 2014 .

[5]  Mark Yerdon,et al.  High Altitude Supersonic Decelerator Test Vehicle , 2013 .

[6]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Influence of sonic-line location on Mars Pathfinder Probe aerothermodynamics , 1996 .

[7]  Shahyar Pirzadeh,et al.  Viscous unstructured three-dimensional grids by the advancing-layers method , 1994 .

[8]  David L. Marcum,et al.  Adaptive unstructured grid generation for viscous flow applications , 1995 .

[9]  Herman L. Bohon,et al.  Deployment and Performance Characteristics of 5-Foot Diameter (1.5m) Attached Inflatable Decelerators from Mach Numbers 2.2-4.4 , 1970 .

[10]  Samareh Jamshid,et al.  GridTool: A Surface Modeling and Grid Generation , 2022 .

[11]  Christopher D. Karlgaard,et al.  Supersonic Flight Dynamics Test: Trajectory, Atmosphere, and Aerodynamics Reconstruction , 2015 .

[12]  Jennifer Wall Msfc What Is Supersonic Flight , 2015 .

[13]  Mark Schoenenberger,et al.  Characterization of Aerodynamic Interactions with the Mars Science Laboratory Reaction Control System Using Computation and Experiment , 2013 .

[14]  Christopher E. Glass,et al.  Analysis of effectiveness of Phoenix Entry Reaction Control System , 2008 .

[15]  J. Balaram,et al.  DSENDS - A high-fidelity dynamics and spacecraft simulator for entry, descent and surface landing , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[16]  Christopher D. Karlgaard,et al.  Ares I-X Trajectory Reconstruction: Methodology and Results , 2013 .

[17]  Deepak Bose,et al.  Aerodynamic Analysis of Next Generation Supersonic Decelerators , 2014 .

[18]  Edward A. Luke,et al.  A Chemically Reacting Flow Solver for Generalized Grids , 2003 .

[19]  Paul V. Tartabini,et al.  Hyper-X Post-Flight Trajectory Reconstruction , 2004 .

[20]  M. M. Penny,et al.  Supersonic flow of chemically reacting gas-particle mixtures. Volume 1: A theoretical analysis and development of the numerical solution , 1976 .

[21]  R. J. Bendura,et al.  Qualification Flight Tests of the Viking Decelerator System , 1973 .

[22]  B. Roberts,et al.  Rocket exhaust plume induced flowfield interaction experiences with the Space Shuttle , 1983 .

[23]  Edward A. Luke,et al.  A step towards 'shape-shifting' algorithms - Reacting flow simulations using generalized grids , 2001 .

[24]  Eric M. Queen,et al.  Oscillation Amplitude Growth for a Decelerating Object with Constant Pitch Damping , 2006 .

[25]  David W. Bogdanoff,et al.  Aerodynamic Coefficients from Aeroballistic Range Testing of Deployed- and Stowed-SIAD SFDT Models , 2017 .

[26]  Todd White,et al.  Data Parallel Line Relaxation (DPLR) Code User Manual: Acadia - Version 4.01.1 , 2009 .

[27]  Karl T. Edquist,et al.  Development of Supersonic Retropropulsion for Future Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing Systems , 2014 .