Which Splint? Dynamic versus Static Progressive Splinting to Mobilise Stiff Joints in the Hand

Mobilising splinting is a common tool used by hand therapists to improve movement in stiff joints, by holding them at the end of available range of motion (ROM) under light tension, for extended periods of time. Both dynamic and static progressive splints are classified as mobilising splints. Many clinicians believe that static progressive splints are more effective than dynamic splints for improving ROM in particularly stiff joints. This paper reviews the limited available research evidence behind the assumptions that currently guide splint choice in clinical practice. Joint stiffness theory and the visco-elastic nature of the soft tissue response to stress are also revised. A rationale for the use of dynamic splints in preference to static progressive splints to mobilise the chronically stiff joint is presented. The need for further research, ideally in the form of a randomised controlled clinical trial, is highlighted.

[1]  R. Ross,et al.  How controlled stress affects healing tissues. , 1998, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[2]  S. Nuzik,et al.  Low-load prolonged stretch vs. high-load brief stretch in treating knee contractures. , 1984, Physical therapy.

[3]  K. Schultz-Johnson Static progressive splinting. , 2002, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[4]  M. Hardy,et al.  Therapeutic effects of heat, cold, and stretch on connective tissue. , 1998, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[5]  L. Tooth,et al.  Optimal daily total end range time for contracture: resolution in hand splinting. , 2003, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[6]  E. Fess,et al.  The influence of splinting on healing tissues. , 1998, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[7]  Josephine M W Wong,et al.  Management of stiff hand: an occupational therapy perspective. , 2002, Hand surgery : an international journal devoted to hand and upper limb surgery and related research : journal of the Asia-Pacific Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand.

[8]  R. Prosser Splinting in the management of proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture. , 1996, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[9]  P. Brand Lessons from hot feet: a note on tissue remodeling. , 2002, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[10]  P W Brand,et al.  Mechanical factors in joint stiffness and tissue growth. , 1995, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[11]  A. Callahan,et al.  Splinting proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contractures: a new design. , 1986, American Journal of Occupational Therapy.

[12]  K. Flowers A proposed decision hierarchy for splinting the stiff joint, with an emphasis on force application parameters. , 2002, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[13]  A. Mak,et al.  The effect of corrective splinting on flexion contracture of rheumatoid fingers. , 2002, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[14]  P LaStayo,et al.  Effect of total end range time on improving passive range of motion. , 1994, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[15]  D. E. Thompson Dynamic properties of soft tissues and their interface with materials. , 1995, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[16]  M. Watkins,et al.  Therapy interventions for improving joint range of motion: A systematic review. , 2004, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[17]  R. J. Johns,et al.  Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Joint Stiffness in Normal Subjects and in Patients with Connective Tissue Diseases *† , 1961, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.