Impact on knowledge and behaviour of the general population of two different methods of solid waste management: An explorative cross-sectional study

The objectives of the present study were to evaluate knowledge among general population about the risks factors of waste management, to estimate the feeling of anxiety concerning the waste, and to compare knowledge of two different methods for collecting municipal solid waste (MSW): a street separate collection system and a door-to-door separate collection system. A cross-sectional study was performed, administering an anonymous questionnaire to 180 inhabitants in Aprilia, Latium, Italy. The study sample consisted of 183 citizens: 64 in the intervention group and 119 in the control group. The intervention was represented by a campaign of door-to-door collection. The correct implementation of separate collection of waste was 87.5% in the intervention group and 63% in the control group (p<0.001). For both groups, the favourite type of waste collection was door-to-door (p=0.013); a high difference concerning the quality of information was found (p<0.0001): in the intervention group, 84% declared to be satisfied (67% sufficient and 17.2% good), while in the control group, 21% declared to be satisfied (16.8% sufficient and 4.2% good). The advice mainly reported from the control group respondents was to increase the size of the information pack (80.7%, p=0.024). The information campaign seemed to increase people’s awareness about the problem, improving the management of waste and household waste. The door-to-door collection was appreciated and preferred by both groups. The adoption of a door-to-door scheme seems to be a winning option mostly because it is supported by an information and education system for the citizens.

[1]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Motivations and behaviors that support recycling , 1998 .

[2]  M Purcell,et al.  Attitudes and behaviour towards waste management in the Dublin, Ireland region. , 2010, Waste management.

[3]  João Menezes,et al.  Behavioral Determinants of Household Recycling Participation , 2004 .

[4]  Paul S Phillips,et al.  Demonstrating the need for the development of internal research capacity: Understanding recycling participation using the Theory of Planned Behaviour in West Oxfordshire, UK , 2006 .

[5]  Victor Corral-Verdugo,et al.  A Structural Model of Reuse and Recycling in Mexico , 1996 .

[6]  Christine Thomas,et al.  PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING AND ITS EFFECT ON RECYCLING PERFORMANCE IN HAMPSHIRE AND MILTON KEYNES , 2001 .

[7]  Joseph R. Hopper,et al.  Recycling as Altruistic Behavior , 1991 .

[8]  Giovanni De Feo,et al.  Siting landfills and incinerators in areas of historic unpopularity: surveying the views of the next generation. , 2013, Waste management.

[9]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2008, BMJ.

[10]  Kristin Magnussen,et al.  Household behaviour and attitudes with respect to recycling food waste--experiences from focus groups. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies , 2007, The Lancet.

[12]  A. Prüss,et al.  Safe management of wastes from health care activities , 2001 .

[13]  Sabino De Gisi,et al.  Public opinion and awareness towards MSW and separate collection programmes: A sociological procedure for selecting areas and citizens with a low level of knowledge , 2010 .

[14]  Ian D Williams,et al.  Public perception of odour and environmental pollution attributed to MSW treatment and disposal facilities: a case study. , 2013, Waste management.