Improving the logistics of a constant order-cycle kanban system

Abstract Kanban systems are simple, effective means of improving production that are widely applied in practice. Based on the logistic process involved, kanban systems can be divided into constant order-quantity and constant order-cycle systems. The former has received much research attention, but the latter, also known as a milk run, has been relatively neglected. Further, most prior work has been based on deterministic data, which is an assumption often violated in practice. We present the case of a manufacturer of domestic water heating equipment where a constant order-cycle kanban implementation initially failed. A structured Define–Measure–Analyse–Improve–Control approach is adopted to improve the process. It was revealed that the failure was due to high variability in the logistic processes involved. Decreasing this variability resulted in a reduction of tardy replenishment routes from 50 to 3%; a reduction in the route time coefficient of variation from 40 to 16%; and a reduction in the mean route time from 31 to 25 min. These improvements allowed one of three existing routes to be eliminated without any negative impact on replenishment. This led to financial savings through the elimination of two operators. The logistic process appears to have a significant impact on kanban performance. Consequently, kanban implementations should not only focus on the kanban system itself but also on the other processes involved. Future research should therefore explore how resources can best be allocated between the different aspects required for a successful kanban implementation.

[1]  Y. Sugimori,et al.  Toyota production system and Kanban system Materialization of just-in-time and respect-for-human system , 1977 .

[2]  John N. Pearson,et al.  Jit Manufacturing: a Survey of Implementations in Small and Large U.S. Manufacturers , 1999 .

[3]  Rosario Domingo,et al.  Redesigning an assembly line through lean manufacturing tools , 2009 .

[4]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  The relationship between JIT practices and type of production system , 2001 .

[5]  Rosario Domingo,et al.  Materials flow improvement in a lean assembly line: a case study , 2007 .

[6]  Vikas Kumar,et al.  Supplier replenishment policy using e-Kanban: A framework for successful implementation , 2014 .

[7]  R. Westbrook Action research: a new paradigm for research in production andoperations management , 1995 .

[8]  Sule Itir Satoglu,et al.  Design of a just-in-time periodic material supply system for the assembly lines and an application in electronics industry , 2013 .

[9]  Yves Dallery,et al.  Extended kanban control system: combining kanban and base stock , 2000 .

[10]  K. Takahashi,et al.  Reacting JIT ordering systems to the unstable changes in demand , 1999 .

[11]  D. Coghlan,et al.  Action research for operations management , 2002 .

[12]  E G A Gaury,et al.  A methodology to customize pull control systems , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[13]  Gagandeep Saini,et al.  Milk Run Logistics: Literature Review and Directions , 2011 .

[14]  B. Costa,et al.  Simulation as a tool for planning a material delivery system to manufacturing lines , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference.

[15]  Bernd Noche,et al.  In-plant milk run decision problems , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Logistics Operations Management.

[16]  門田 安弘,et al.  Toyota production system : practical approach to production management , 1983 .

[17]  David M. Miller,et al.  A capacitated vehicle routing problem for just-in-time delivery , 1999 .

[18]  新郷 重夫,et al.  A study of the Toyota production system from an industrial engineering viewpoint , 1989 .

[19]  Pär Åhlström,et al.  The difficult path to lean product development , 1996 .

[20]  Jeroen de Mast,et al.  An analysis of the Six Sigma DMAIC method from the perspective of problem solving , 2012 .

[21]  David M. Levine,et al.  Six Sigma for Green Belts and Champions: Foundations, DMAIC, Tools, Cases, and Certification , 2004 .

[22]  Charles Protzman,et al.  Leveraging Lean in Healthcare: Transforming Your Enterprise into a High Quality Patient Care Delivery System , 2010 .

[23]  Surendra M. Gupta,et al.  An algorithm to dynamically adjust the number of Kanbans in stochastic processing times and variable demand environment , 1997 .

[24]  大野 耐一,et al.  Toyota production system : beyond large-scale production , 1988 .

[25]  Antonio Freitas Rentes,et al.  Improving Hospital Performance by Use of Lean Techniques: An Action Research Project in Brazil , 2015 .

[26]  Muris Lage Junior,et al.  Variations of the kanban system: Literature review and classification , 2010 .

[27]  Mark Stevenson,et al.  Workload control: Successful implementation taking a contingency‐based view of production planning and control , 2013 .

[28]  Murat Baskak,et al.  Classification and modeling for in-plant milk-run distribution systems , 2012 .

[29]  K. Hambridge Action research. , 2000, Professional nurse.

[30]  P. Nonthaleerak,et al.  Six Sigma action research in Thailand: a comparative study , 2007, Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag..