Modelling pollution-generating technologies in performance benchmarking: Recent developments, limits and future prospects in the nonparametric framework

This article is a critical review of methods integrating environmental aspects into productive efficiency. We describe the classic modelling approach relying on the weak disposability assumption, and explain the major recent developments around the inclusion of undesirable outputs in production technology modelling, namely the materials balance principles and the weak G-disposability, the by-production modelling and the cost disposability assumption, and the unified model under natural and managerial disposability concepts. We discuss the limits inherent in each methodology and suggest future research perspectives.

[1]  M. Cropper,et al.  Environmental Economics: A Survey , 1992 .

[2]  Kerui Du,et al.  Sources of the potential CO2 emission reduction in China: A nonparametric metafrontier approach , 2014 .

[3]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Modelling weak disposability in data envelopment analysis under relaxed convexity assumptions , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity: Should We Include Bads? , 2012 .

[5]  Jean-Paul Chavas,et al.  Applied Production Analysis: A Dual Approach , 1988 .

[6]  R. Färe,et al.  The measurement of efficiency of production , 1985 .

[7]  Kenneth Løvold Rødseth,et al.  Efficiency measurement when producers control pollutants: a non-parametric approach , 2014 .

[8]  Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen,et al.  Energy and Economic Myths: Institutional and Analytical Economic Essays , 1981 .

[9]  Jean-Philippe Boussemart,et al.  Economic value of greenhouse gases and nitrogen surpluses: Society vs farmers' valuation , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Gumersindo Feijoo,et al.  Further potentials in the joint implementation of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  V. V. Podinovski,et al.  Bridging the gap between the constant and variable returns-to-scale models: selective proportionality in data envelopment analysis , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[12]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  Evaluating eco-efficiency with data envelopment analysis: an analytical reexamination , 2014, Ann. Oper. Res..

[13]  Sushama Murty,et al.  On the theory of a firm: The case of by-production of emissions , 2010 .

[14]  V. E. Ball,et al.  Effective Costs and Chemical Use in United States Agricultural Production: Using the Environment as a “Free” Input , 2002 .

[15]  Wallace E. Oates,et al.  Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm? , 1995 .

[16]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Performance analysis of US coal-fired power plants by measuring three DEA efficiencies , 2010 .

[17]  R. Färe,et al.  Congestion of Production Factors , 1980 .

[18]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions , 2007 .

[19]  Diego Prior,et al.  Efficiency and environmental regulation: a "complex situation" , 2005 .

[20]  Ming-Miin Yu,et al.  Technical efficiency and impact of environmental regulations in farrow‐to‐finish swine production in Taiwan , 2008 .

[21]  P. Zhou,et al.  On estimating shadow prices of undesirable outputs with efficiency models: A literature review , 2014, Applied Energy.

[22]  Andrew L. Johnson,et al.  Estimating the efficiency of American petroleum refineries under varying assumptions of the disposability of bad outputs , 2010 .

[23]  Sushama Murty,et al.  Externalities and fundamental nonconvexities: A reconciliation of approaches to general equilibrium externality modeling and implications for decentralization , 2010, J. Econ. Theory.

[24]  R. Färe,et al.  Regulation and Unintended Consequences , 2012 .

[25]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA radial and non-radial models for unified efficiency under natural and managerial disposability: Theoretical extension by strong complementary slackness conditions , 2012 .

[26]  T. Considine,et al.  The Environment as a Factor of Production , 2004 .

[27]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Thermodynamics and process analysis for future economic scenarios , 1995, Environmental and Resource Economics.

[28]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[29]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: Comment , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Data envelopment analysis for environmental assessment: Comparison between public and private ownership in petroleum industry , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Advanced Robust and Nonparametric Methods in Efficiency Analysis: Methodology and Applications , 2007 .

[32]  Pekka J. Korhonen,et al.  ECO-EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF POWER PLANTS: AN EXTENSION OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[33]  R. Färe,et al.  Theory and Application of Directional Distance Functions , 2000 .

[34]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[35]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Nonparametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: Comment , 2003 .

[36]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Measuring the technical efficiency of production , 1978 .

[37]  Ludwig Lauwers,et al.  Environmental efficiency measurement and the materials balance condition , 2007 .

[38]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[39]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach , 1995 .

[40]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1982 .

[41]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA environmental assessment of coal fired power plants: Methodological comparison between radial and non-radial models , 2012 .

[42]  Gerald L. Thompson,et al.  A GENERALIZATION OF THE VON NEUMANN MODEL OF AN EXPANDING ECONOMY , 1956 .

[43]  Hervé Leleu,et al.  Duality of Shephard's weakly disposable technology under a directional output distance function , 2013 .

[44]  K. Rødseth,et al.  Environmental Regulations, Producer Responses, and Secondary Benefits: Carbon Dioxide Reductions Under the Acid Rain Program , 2014 .

[45]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Good Modelling of Bad Outputs: Pollution and Multiple-Output Production , 2009 .

[46]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA approach for unified efficiency measurement: Assessment of Japanese fossil fuel power generation , 2011 .

[47]  Udo Ebert,et al.  Environmental Emissions and Production Economics: Implications of the Materials Balance , 2007 .

[48]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  Measurement of agricultural total factor productivity growth incorporating environmental factors: A nutrients balance approach , 2011 .

[49]  Russell Pittman,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons with Undesirable Outputs , 1983 .

[50]  W. Cooper,et al.  RAM: A Range Adjusted Measure of Inefficiency for Use with Additive Models, and Relations to Other Models and Measures in DEA , 1999 .

[51]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Joint Production of Good and Bad Outputs with a Network Application , 2013 .

[52]  D. Rao,et al.  Measuring and decomposing sustainable efficiency in agricultural production: A cumulative exergy balance approach , 2010 .

[53]  Biresh K. Sahoo,et al.  Radial and non-radial decompositions of Luenberger productivity indicator with an illustrative application , 2011 .

[54]  Jean-Philippe Boussemart,et al.  Finding the right compromise between productivity and environmental efficiency on high input tropical dairy farms: a case study. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[55]  Holger Scheel,et al.  Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[56]  M. Steven,et al.  The environment as a factor of production , 1990 .

[57]  Harald Dyckhoff,et al.  Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA) , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[58]  Sushama Murty On the Theory of By-Production of Emissions , 2012 .

[59]  E. J. Mishan,et al.  Exploring the “Uneconomic Region” of the Production Function , 1962 .

[60]  Benjamin Hampf,et al.  Arbeitspapiere Der Volkswirtschaftlichen Fachgebiete Der Tu Darmstadt Carbon Dioxide Emission Standards for U.s. Power Plants: an Efficiency Analysis Perspective , 2022 .

[61]  Campbell R. McConnell,et al.  Economics: Principles, Problems, and Policies , 1960 .

[62]  Sushama Murty,et al.  On modeling pollution-generating technologies , 2012 .

[63]  Daniel Tyteca,et al.  On the Measurement of the Environmental Performance of Firms— A Literature Review and a Productive Efficiency Perspective , 1996 .

[64]  Biresh K. Sahoo,et al.  Alternative measures of environmental technology structure in DEA: An application , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[65]  R. Shepherd Theory of cost and production functions , 1970 .

[66]  A. Hailu,et al.  Non‐Parametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: An Application to the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry , 2001 .

[67]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Effects on relative efficiency in electric power generation due to environmental controls , 1986 .

[68]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies , 2008 .

[69]  Timo Kuosmanen Weak Disposability in Nonparametric Production Analysis with Undesirable Outputs , 2005 .

[70]  Stefan Baumgärtner,et al.  The concept of joint production and ecological economics , 2001 .

[71]  Paul Hudson,et al.  Indirect Production Functions. , 1975 .

[72]  J. Pastor,et al.  Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: A comparison of European and non-European countries , 1995 .

[73]  F. Hernández-Sancho,et al.  Efficiency and Environmental Regulation , 2000 .

[74]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[75]  R. Ayres,et al.  Production, Consumption, and Externalities , 1969 .

[76]  Hervé Leleu,et al.  Shadow pricing of undesirable outputs in nonparametric analysis , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[77]  Robert J Volk,et al.  Citation searches are more sensitive than keyword searches to identify studies using specific measurement instruments. , 2015, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[78]  G. Huylenbroeck,et al.  MATERIALS BALANCE BASED MODELLING OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY , 2003 .

[79]  R. Färe,et al.  Measuring congestion in production , 1983 .

[80]  Steven Van Passel,et al.  Advantages and limitations of exergy indicators to assess sustainability of bioenergy and biobased materials , 2014 .

[81]  Biresh K. Sahoo,et al.  Examining the drivers of total factor productivity change with an illustrative example of 14 EU countries , 2011 .

[82]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Weak Disposability in Nonparametric Production Analysis: Reply to Färe and Grosskopf , 2009 .

[83]  H. Varian The Nonparametric Approach to Production Analysis , 1984 .

[84]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Indirect Production Functions. Mathematical Systems in Economics, 10 , 1975 .

[85]  Stijn Bruers,et al.  Exergy: its potential and limitations in environmental science and technology. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[86]  Rolf Färe,et al.  A Comment on Weak Disposability in Nonparametric Production Analysis , 2009 .

[87]  Mohammad Alauddin,et al.  Analysis of agricultural sustainability: A review of exergy methodologies and their application in OECD countries , 2011 .

[88]  Kingsley E. Haynes,et al.  Environmental decision models: U.S. experience and a new approach to pollution management , 1993 .

[89]  R. Shephard Cost and production functions , 1953 .

[90]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Methodological comparison between two unified (operational and environmental) efficiency measurements for environmental assessment , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[91]  Alfons Oude Lansink,et al.  Estimating shadow prices and efficiency analysis of productive inputs and pesticide use of vegetable production , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[92]  Hongliang Yang,et al.  Incorporating Both Undesirable Outputs and Uncontrollable Variables into Dea: the Performance of Chinese Coal-fired Power Plants Incorporating Both Undesirable Outputs and Uncontrollable Variables into Dea: the Performance of Chinese Coal-fired Power Plants , 2007 .

[93]  T. Coelli,et al.  Formulation of Technical, Economic and Environmental Efficiency Measures That Are Consistent With the Materials balance Condition , 2005 .

[94]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Duality of weakly disposable technology , 2011 .

[95]  Thomas R. Sexton,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis with Reverse Inputs and Outputs , 2004 .

[96]  Ludwig Lauwers,et al.  Justifying the incorporation of the materials balance principle into frontier-based eco-efficiency models , 2009 .

[97]  Michael G. Pollitt,et al.  The necessity of distinguishing weak and strong disposability among undesirable outputs in DEA: Environmental performance of Chinese coal-fired power plants , 2010 .

[98]  Peng Zhou,et al.  A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[99]  W. Baumol,et al.  Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure , 1982 .

[100]  Andy Johnson,et al.  Estimating Efficiency of U.S. Oil Refineries under Varying Assumptions Regarding Disposability of Bad Outputs , 2009 .

[101]  R. Pethig,et al.  Nonlinear Production, Abatement, Pollution and Materials Balance Reconsidered , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[102]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Allocation in ISO 14041—a critical review , 2001 .

[103]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Should the US clean air act include CO2 emission control?: Examination by data envelopment analysis , 2010 .

[104]  Rolf Färe,et al.  New directions : efficiency and productivity , 2004 .

[105]  Olli Tahvonen,et al.  Economic growth, pollution, and renewable resources , 1993 .

[106]  A. Barbera,et al.  The impact of environmental regulations on industry productivity: Direct and indirect effects , 1990 .

[107]  Ragnar Frisch,et al.  Theory Of Production , 1965 .

[108]  D. Primont,et al.  Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications , 1994 .

[109]  Diego Prior,et al.  Environmental externalities and efficiency measurement. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.