Impact of polyethylene glycol loxenatide on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (BALANCE-3)

Introduction Recent cardiovascular outcomes trials have demonstrated that glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) decreases the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Polyethylene glycol loxenatide (PEG-Loxe) is a once-weekly GLP-1RA obtained by modifying exendin-4. No clinical trials have been designed to assess the impact of PEG-Loxe on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in individuals with T2DM. This trial aims to test the hypothesis that compared with placebo, PEG-Loxe treatment does not result in an unacceptable increase in CV risk in individuals with T2DM. Methods and analysis This study is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients with T2DM who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomly divided to receive weekly administration of either PEG-Loxe 0.2 mg or placebo (1:1 ratio). The randomisation was stratified according to utilisation of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, history of CV disease and body mass index. The research period is expected to be 3 years, with a 1-year recruitment period and a 2-year follow-up period. The primary outcome is the occurrence of the first MACE, described as CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke. The statistical analyses were undertaken on the intent-to-treat patient. The primary outcome was evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment and randomisation strata as the covariates. Ethics and dissemination The current research has been authorised by the Ethics Committee of Tianjin Medical University Chu Hsien-I Memorial Hospital (approval number: ZXYJNYYhMEC2022-2). Researchers must acquire informed consent from every participant before conducting any protocol-associated procedures. The findings of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Trial registration number ChiCTR2200056410.

[1]  Chuan Xiao,et al.  Polyethylene Glycol Loxenatide Injection (GLP-1) Protects Vascular Endothelial Cell Function in Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes by Regulating Gut Microbiota , 2022, Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences.

[2]  Q. Pan,et al.  Exposure–Response Analysis of Cardiovascular Outcome Trials With Incretin-Based Therapies , 2022, Frontiers in Endocrinology.

[3]  B. Duncan,et al.  IDF diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045 , 2021, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice.

[4]  J. Rosenstock,et al.  Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Efpeglenatide in Type 2 Diabetes. , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  S. Kaul Understanding the merits and drawbacks of noninferiority designs in cardiovascular medicine. , 2021, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[6]  S. Bain,et al.  The Role of Tirzepatide, Dual GIP and GLP-1 Receptor Agonist, in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes: The SURPASS Clinical Trials , 2020, Diabetes Therapy.

[7]  N. Xu,et al.  Efficacy and safety of polyethylene glycol loxenatide monotherapy in type 2 diabetes patients: A multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase 3a clinical trial , 2020, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[8]  Y. Bao,et al.  Efficacy and safety of polyethylene glycol loxenatide as add‐on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: A multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 3b trial , 2020, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[9]  L. Chiovato,et al.  Obesity, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, and Infertility: A New Avenue for GLP-1 Receptor Agonists , 2020, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[10]  M. Baroni,et al.  GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: New Insights and Opportunities for Cardiovascular Protection. , 2020, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[11]  T. Vilsbøll,et al.  Oral Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  W. E. Sanabria,et al.  Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial , 2019, The Lancet.

[13]  W. Sheu,et al.  Cardiovascular safety of oral semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: Rationale, design and patient baseline characteristics for the PIONEER 6 trial , 2018, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[14]  K. Wyne,et al.  Cardiovascular Outcomes with Once-Weekly GLP-1 RAs: Clinical and Economic Implications , 2018, Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy.

[15]  T. Einarson,et al.  Prevalence of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review of scientific evidence from across the world in 2007–2017 , 2018, Cardiovascular Diabetology.

[16]  M. Doumas,et al.  Once-Weekly Exenatide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Gangyi Yang,et al.  Polyethylene glycol loxenatide injections added to metformin effectively improve glycemic control and exhibit favorable safety in type 2 diabetic patients , 2017, Journal of diabetes.

[18]  Lawrence A Leiter,et al.  Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  M. Fischereder,et al.  Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  S. Solomon,et al.  Lixisenatide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  C. Solis-Herrera,et al.  GLP-1 Receptor Agonists , 2015, The Diabetes educator.

[22]  Jinkui Yang,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a polyethylene glycol (PEG)‐conjugated GLP‐receptor agonist once weekly in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes , 2015, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[23]  F. Giorgino,et al.  GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Cardiovascular Protection: A Matter of Time , 2022 .

[24]  F. Porzsolt,et al.  Using machine learning to predict laboratory test results , 2016, Annals of clinical biochemistry.