Examining the materiality and spatiality of design scaffolds in computational making

Abstract As researchers focus more on engaging youth with advanced technologies to build computational skills, there is a need to develop tools that support youth to become creators of digital content rather than consumers of these technologies. Scholars refer to this shift in becoming creators of technology as computational making, which enables new forms of learning and thinking at the intersection of the physical and the digital. The interdisciplinary and multidimensional nature of computational making design processes means learners must negotiate their design idea across space, time, mode, and expertise. In this paper, we draw on multiple iterations of design and implementation work with wearable and locative technologies to investigate the affordances and challenges of design scaffolds in youths’ computational making design processes. We present examples from learning with electronic textiles and locative game design to illustrate the unique problem spaces of materiality and spatiality specific to computational making. Our insights highlight a significant need for sharing scholarship and design work on implementing design scaffolds in computational making contexts toward the collective goal of developing a system of design scaffolds to effectively support learners’ thinking across the interdisciplinary, multimodal problem spaces unique to computational making.

[1]  S. Turkle,et al.  Epistemological Pluralism: Styles and Voices within the Computer Culture , 1990, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[2]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Computing for all?: Examining critical biases in computational tools for learning , 2020, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[3]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Modelling the Design Process in Engineering and in Architecture , 1992 .

[4]  Damiana Gibbons Pyles A social semiotic mapping of voice in youth media: the pitch in youth video production† , 2017 .

[5]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Technology as small group face-to-face Collaborative Scaffolding , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Aylin C. Küntay,et al.  Learning from the real and the virtual worlds: Educational use of augmented reality in early childhood , 2019, Int. J. Child Comput. Interact..

[7]  Yifat Ben-David Kolikant,et al.  “So my program doesn’t run!” Definition, origins, and practical expressions of students’ (mis)conceptions of correctness , 2008, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[8]  三嶋 博之 The theory of affordances , 2008 .

[9]  Breanne K. Litts,et al.  Engaging youth in computational thinking practices through designing place-based mobile games about local issues , 2019, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[10]  R. Sternberg What Is an “Expert Student?” , 2003 .

[11]  Sze Yee Lye,et al.  Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Lee Martin,et al.  The Promise of the Maker Movement for Education , 2015 .

[13]  Richard Noss,et al.  Playing Beowulf: Bridging computational thinking, arts and literature through game-making , 2017, Int. J. Child Comput. Interact..

[14]  B. Belland,et al.  Scaffolding argumentation about water quality: a mixed-method study in a rural middle school , 2015 .

[15]  Michael S. Horn Tangible Interaction and Cultural Forms: Supporting Learning in Informal Environments , 2018, Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[16]  Susan Pedersen,et al.  Scaffolding middle school students’ content knowledge and ill-structured problem solving in a problem-based hypermedia learning environment , 2010 .

[17]  Shuchi Grover,et al.  Measuring Student Learning in Introductory Block-Based Programming: Examining Misconceptions of Loops, Variables, and Boolean Logic , 2017, SIGCSE.

[18]  G. Gargarian,et al.  The Art of Design: , 2019, Variations on Media Thinking.

[19]  Sue Fitzgerald,et al.  Debugging: a review of the literature from an educational perspective , 2008, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[20]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  From players to makers: An empirical examination of factors that affect creative game development , 2018, Int. J. Child Comput. Interact..

[21]  Heidi Schelhowe,et al.  Designing digital fabrication learning environments for Bildung: Implications from ten years of physical computing workshops , 2015, Int. J. Child Comput. Interact..

[22]  J. Kolodner,et al.  Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design , 2005 .

[23]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Using Technology to Assist in Realizing Effective Learning and Instruction: A Principled Approach to the Use of Computers in Collaborative Learning , 1994 .

[24]  C. Hmelo‐Silver,et al.  Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006) , 2007 .

[25]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning and Metacognition – Implications for the Design of Computer-based Scaffolds , 2005 .

[26]  Ying-Shao Hsu,et al.  A Design Model of Distributed Scaffolding for Inquiry-Based Learning , 2015 .

[27]  Anna Keune,et al.  Materials-to-develop-with: The making of a makerspace , 2018, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[28]  Katie Headrick Taylor Learning Along Lines: Locative Literacies for Reading and Writing the City , 2017 .

[29]  Wanli Xing,et al.  The effect of sustained vs. faded scaffolding on students' argumentation in ill-structured problem solving , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[31]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[32]  Clark A. Chinn,et al.  Model-evidence link diagrams: a scaffold for model-based reasoning , 2010, ICLS.

[33]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  Exploring Children's Data Modeling , 1996 .

[34]  Vinod Goel,et al.  The Structure of Design Problem Spaces , 1992, Cogn. Sci..

[35]  Breanne K. Litts,et al.  Mobile Augmented Reality: Exploring a new genre of learning , 2019, GETMBL.

[36]  Kimberly M. Sheridan,et al.  Culturally responsive computing: a theory revisited , 2015 .

[37]  Erica Rosenfeld Halverson,et al.  “Key Moments” as Pedagogical Windows into the Video Production Process , 2009 .

[38]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Synergy Between Teacher Practices and Curricular Scaffolds to Support Students in Using Domain-Specific and Domain-General Knowledge in Writing Arguments to Explain Phenomena , 2009 .

[39]  R. Keith Sawyer,et al.  Learning How to Create: Toward A Learning Sciences of Art and Design , 2012, ICLS.

[40]  Shuchi Grover,et al.  Computational Thinking in K–12 , 2013 .

[41]  Resnick,et al.  Programming for All , 2009 .

[42]  Susan A. Yoon,et al.  Scaffolding Informal Learning in Science Museums: How Much Is Too Much?. , 2013 .

[43]  Peter Parnes,et al.  Makerspace in school - Considerations from a large-scale national testbed , 2017, Int. J. Child Comput. Interact..

[44]  Elisabeth Soep Critique: Assessment and the Production of Learning , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[45]  Diversifying Computational Tools: How Technology Affords and Constrains Indigenous Youths' Design Agency , 2020, ICLS.

[46]  L. Delpit The Silenced Dialogue: Power and Pedagogy in Educating Other People's Children , 1988 .

[47]  S. Merriam Qualitative Case Studies , 2010 .

[48]  Alice Anderson,et al.  Failing to learn: The impact of failures during making activities , 2018, Thinking Skills and Creativity.

[49]  Stavros Demetriadis,et al.  Tangible and graphical programming with experienced children: A mixed methods analysis , 2019, Int. J. Child Comput. Interact..

[50]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[51]  Erica Halverson,et al.  The Maker Movement in Education , 2014, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.

[52]  Deborah A. Fields,et al.  A Crafts-Oriented Approach to Computing in High School , 2014, ACM Trans. Comput. Educ..

[53]  Kristin A. Searle,et al.  Debugging open-ended designs: High school students’ perceptions of failure and success in an electronic textiles design activity , 2018, Thinking Skills and Creativity.

[54]  M. Resnick,et al.  Beyond Black Boxes: Bringing Transparency and Aesthetics Back to Scientific Investigation , 2000 .

[55]  B. Glaser The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis , 1965 .

[56]  Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry , 2003 .

[57]  Konstantin Aal,et al.  From computational thinking to computational making , 2015, UbiComp.

[58]  David Weintrop,et al.  To block or not to block, that is the question: students' perceptions of blocks-based programming , 2015, IDC.

[59]  Thomas W. Price,et al.  Comparing Textual and Block Interfaces in a Novice Programming Environment , 2015, ICER.

[60]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Success in introductory programming: what works? , 2013, CACM.

[61]  Breanne K. Litts,et al.  Learning in the Making: A Comparative Case Study of Three Makerspaces. , 2014 .

[62]  Natalia Kucirkova,et al.  Children's agency by design: Design parameters for personalization in story-making apps , 2019, Int. J. Child Comput. Interact..