Modeling collective rule at ancient Teotihuacan as a complex adaptive system: Communal ritual makes social hierarchy more effective

Abstract Experts remain divided about the nature of the sociopolitical system of ancient Teotihuacan, which was one of the earliest and largest urban civilizations of the Americas. Excavations hoping to find compelling evidence of powerful rulers, such as a royal tomb, keep coming away empty-handed. But the alternative possibility of collective rule still remains poorly understood as well. Previously we used a computational model of this city’s hypothetical sociopolitical network to show that in principle collective rule based on communal ritual could be an effective strategy of ensuring widespread social coordination, as long as we assume that the network’s structure could be transformed via social learning and local leaders were not strongly subdivided. Here we extended this model to investigate whether increased social hierarchy could mitigate the negative effects of such strong divisions. We found a special synergy between social hierarchy and communal ritual: only their combination improved the extent of social coordination, whereas the introduction of centralization and top-down influence by themselves had no effect. This finding is consistent with portrayals of the Teotihuacan elite as religious specialists serving the public good, in particular by synchronizing the city’s ritual calendar with the rhythms of the stars.

[1]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems , 2000 .

[2]  Peter N. Peregrine,et al.  A Dual-Processual Theory for the Evolution of Mesoamerican Civilization , 1996, Current Anthropology.

[3]  Wright Professor Stephen,et al.  Rites of Passage , 2010 .

[4]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Linda Manzanilla,et al.  Corporate Groups and Domestic Activities at Teotihuacan , 1996, Latin American Antiquity.

[6]  G. Feinman,et al.  Cooperation, collective action, and the archeology of large‐scale societies , 2016, Evolutionary anthropology.

[7]  Lane F. Fargher,et al.  Collective Action in the Evolution of Pre-Modern States * , 2009 .

[8]  David M. Carballo,et al.  Urbanization and Religion in Ancient Central Mexico , 2016 .

[9]  Agapi Filini,et al.  Teotihuacan: Ritual Economy, Exchange, and Urbanization Processes in Classic Period Mesoamerica , 2015 .

[10]  R Millon,et al.  Teotihuac�n: Completion of Map of Giant Ancient City in the Valley of Mexico , 1970, Science.

[11]  Daniel Grana-Behrens Robb, Matthew H. (ed.): Teotihuacan. City of Water, City of Fire , 2018 .

[12]  Saburo Sugiyama,et al.  Inside the Sun Pyramid at Teotihuacan, Mexico: 2008—2011 Excavations and Preliminary Results , 2013, Latin American Antiquity.

[13]  Ian G. Robertson,et al.  INVESTIGATING TEOTIHUACAN THROUGH TMP SURFACE COLLECTIONS AND OBSERVATIONS , 2015, Ancient Mesoamerica.

[14]  T. Froese Ritual anti-structure as an alternate pathway to social complexity? The case of ancient Teotihuacan, Central Mexico , 2018, Material Religion.

[15]  Richard E. Blanton,et al.  Alternative pathways to power in late Postclassic Highland Mesoamerica , 2011 .

[16]  Tom Froese,et al.  Can Government Be Self-Organized? A Mathematical Model of the Collective Social Organization of Ancient Teotihuacan, Central Mexico , 2014, PloS one.

[17]  杉山 三郎 Human sacrifice, militarism, and rulership : materialization of state ideology at the Feathered Serpent Pyramid, Teotihuacan , 2005 .

[18]  Zoltán Paulinyi,et al.  LOS SEÑORES CON TOCADO DE BORLAS , 2001, Ancient Mesoamerica.

[19]  L. Manzanilla,et al.  Cooperation and tensions in multiethnic corporate societies using Teotihuacan, Central Mexico, as a case study , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  V. Turner,et al.  The Ritual Process. Structure and Anti-Structure , 1978 .

[21]  Richard A. Watson,et al.  Global Adaptation in Networks of Selfish Components: Emergent Associative Memory at the System Scale , 2011, Artificial Life.

[22]  Manzanilla Naim,et al.  Gobierno corporativo en Teotihuacan: una revisión del concepto palacio aplicado a la gran urbe prehispánica , 2010 .

[23]  Kathleen Berrin,et al.  Feathered serpents and flowering trees : reconstructing the murals of Teotihuacan , 1991 .

[24]  J. Stephen Lansing,et al.  Artificial Societies and the Social Sciences , 2002, Artificial Life.

[25]  Timothy A. Kohler,et al.  Corrigendum: Greater post-Neolithic wealth disparities in Eurasia than in North America and Mesoamerica , 2018, Nature.

[26]  William H. Heiser,et al.  Where Do They All Come From , 1980 .

[27]  Annabeth Headrick,et al.  The Teotihuacan Trinity: The Sociopolitical Structure of an Ancient Mesoamerican City , 2007 .

[28]  Saburo Sugiyama,et al.  Human Sacrifice, Militarism, and Rulership: Materialization of State Ideology at the Feathered Serpent Pyramid, Teotihuacan , 2005 .

[29]  Michael E. Smith,et al.  The Teotihuacan Anomaly: The Historical Trajectory of Urban Design in Ancient Central Mexico , 2017 .

[30]  Tom Froese,et al.  Self-modeling in Hopfield Neural Networks with Continuous Activation Function , 2017, BICA.

[31]  Zoltán Paulinyi,et al.  THE BUTTERFLY BIRD GOD AND HIS MYTH AT TEOTIHUACAN , 2014, Ancient Mesoamerica.

[32]  Richard E. Blanton,et al.  Urbanization at Téotihuacan, Mexico , 1982 .

[33]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[34]  Tom Froese,et al.  Reflections on the Complexity of Ancient Social Heterarchies: Toward New Models of Social Self-Organization in Pre-Hispanic Colombia , 2014 .

[35]  Susan Toby Evans Location and Orientation of Teotihuacan, Mexico: Water Worship and Processional Space , 2016 .

[36]  Linda Manzanilla,et al.  State Formation in the New World , 2001 .

[37]  Richard A. Watson,et al.  Optimization in "self-modeling" complex adaptive systems , 2011, Complex..

[38]  Jesper Nielsen Where Kings Once Ruled?: Considerations on Palaces and Rulership at Teotihuacan , 2014 .

[39]  Tom Froese,et al.  Nobility-targeting raids among the Classic Maya: Cooperation in scale-free networks persists under tournament attack when population size fluctuates , 2016, ALIFE.

[40]  Richard E. Blanton,et al.  Collective Action In The Formation Of Pre-Modern States , 2007 .

[41]  Vernon L. Scarborough,et al.  Heterarchy, political economy, and the ancient Maya : the Three Rivers Region of the east-central Yucatán Peninsula , 2003 .

[42]  Rex Koontz,et al.  Mexico: From the Olmecs to the Aztecs , 1962 .

[43]  Linda Manzanilla Teopancazco. Un centro de barrio multiétnico de Teotihuacan , 2019 .

[44]  David M. Carballo,et al.  Cooperation and Collective Action in the Cultural Evolution of Complex Societies , 2014 .

[45]  Jason Noble,et al.  “If You Can't Be With the One You Love, Love the One You're With”: How Individual Habituation of Agent Interactions Improves Global Utility , 2011, Artificial Life.

[46]  George L. Cowgill,et al.  Ancient Teotihuacan: Early Urbanism in Central Mexico , 2015 .

[47]  John E. Clark,et al.  The political economy of ancient Mesoamerica : transformations during the formative and classic periods , 2007 .

[48]  Linda R. Manzanilla Teopancazco:: A Multiethnic Neighborhood Center in the Metropolis of Teotihuacan , 2017 .

[49]  C. Stanish The Evolution of Human Co-operation: Ritual and Social Complexity in Stateless Societies , 2017 .

[50]  Patricia Plunket,et al.  Preclassic Household Patterns Preserved under Volcanic Ash at Tetimpa, Puebla, Mexico , 1998, Latin American Antiquity.

[51]  Luís M. A. Bettencourt,et al.  The Pre-History of Urban Scaling , 2014, PloS one.

[52]  Esther Pasztory,et al.  Teotihuacan: An Experiment in Living , 1997 .