Oocyte development in XO foetuses of man and mouse: the possible role of heterologous X-chromosome pairing in germ cell survival

The pairing characteristics of the X axis in XO human and mouse oocytes were studied by the spreading technique throughout meiotic prophase. In three human XO foetuses, germ cell development was seen to be largely blocked at the preleptotene stage. In XO mice on the other hand, oocytes surviving through pachytene increasingly show the X axis making a non-homologous association with itself or with an autosome. Such associations take the form hairpins or rings when self pairing occurs or triradial structures when involvement is with an autosome. Pairing initiation in the autosomes involved is disturbed by the X axis suggesting that the heterologous pairing seen is taking place at the earliest stage of synaptonemal complex formation, namely zygotene. It is suggested, that in the XO mouse, and perhaps also in rare fertile XO humans, survival, of a population of oocytes into the adult is ensured by the ability of the X axis to pair non-homologously at meiotic prophase, thus satisfying pairing requirements.

[1]  R. Speed.  The prophase stages in human foetal oocytes studied by light and electron microscopy , 2004, Human Genetics.

[2]  B. Mcclintock.  The association of non-homologous parts of chromosomes in the mid-prophase of meiosis in zea mays , 1933, Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie.

[3]  R. Aitken.  Development and Function of Reproductive Organs , 1983 .

[4]  Dr. Bernard John,et al.  The Meiotic System , 1965, Protoplasmatologia.

[5]  P. Holm.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of chromosome pairing during the zygotene stage of meiosis in Lilium longiflorum (thunb.) , 1977 .

[6]  A. Chandley,et al.  Meiosis in the foetal mouse ovary , 1983, Chromosoma.

[7]  E. P. Evans,et al.  Inversion heterozygosity and the origin of XO daughters of Bpa/+ female mice , 1975, Nature.

[8]  M. Lyon,et al.  Reproductive lifespan in irradiated and unirradiated chromosomally XO mice. , 1973, Genetical research.

[9]  D. Carr.  Cytogenetic Aspects of Induced and Spontaneous Abortions , 1972, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  S. W. Rasmussen,et al.  The synaptonemal complex in genetic segregation. , 1984, Annual review of genetics.

[11]  K. W. Cooper.  MEIOTIC CONJUNCTIVE ELEMENTS NOT INVOLVING CHIASMATA. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  C. Gillies.  The nature and extent of synaptonemal complex formation in haploid barley , 1974, Chromosoma.

[13]  R. Speed.  Prophase pairing in a mosaic 18p-;iso 18q human female foetus studied by surface spreading , 1986, Human Genetics.

[14]  K. Kasha,et al.  Meiosis in haploid barley — An interpretation of non-homologous chromosome associations , 1971, Chromosoma.

[15]  Chandley Ac.  Infertility and chromosome abnormality. , 1984 .

[16]  G. L. Miklos,et al.  Sex-chromosome pairing and male fertility. , 1974, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[17]  Maegaret Y. Menzel,et al.  FINE STRUCTURE OF SYNAPSED CHOMOSOMES IN F1 LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM‐SOLANUM LYCOPERSICOIDES AND ITS PARENTS , 1966 .

[18]  Carr Dh.  Cytogenetic aspects of induced and spontaneous abortions. , 1972 .

[19]  Baker Tg,et al.  Meiotic pairing and gametogenic failure. , 1984 .

[20]  P. Hobolth.  Chromosome pairing in allohexaploid wheat var. Chinese Spring. Transformation of multivalents into bivalents, a mechanism for exclusive bivalent formation , 1981 .

[21]  P. Burgoyne,et al.  Oocyte depletion in XO mice and their XX sibs from 12 to 200 days post partum. , 1981, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[22]  E. Eicher,et al.  Assignment of genes to regions of mouse chromosomes. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  RoderickP. Singh,et al.  The anatomy and histology of XO human embryos and fetuses. , 1967, The Anatomical record.

[24]  P. Moens.  The structure and function of the synaptinemal complex inLilium longiflorum sporocytes , 1968, Chromosoma.

[25]  A. Chandley.  Infertility and chromosome abnormality. , 1984, Oxford reviews of reproductive biology.

[26]  A. Mandl,et al.  A quantitative and cytological study of oogonia and oocytes in the foetal and neonatal rat , 1962, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[27]  L. B. Russell,et al.  THE Y-CHROMOSOME AS THE BEARER OF MALE DETERMINING FACTORS IN THE MOUSE. , 1959, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  E. Magenis,et al.  Pregnancy and the Turner syndrome. , 1978, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[29]  D. Carr,et al.  Germ cells in the ovaries of XO female infants. , 1968, American journal of clinical pathology.

[30]  J. Dewhurst,et al.  Fertility in 47,XXX and 45,X patients. , 1978, Journal of medical genetics.

[31]  H. Moseley,et al.  Bare-patches, a new sex-linked gene in the mouse, associated with a high production of XO females. I. A preliminary report of breeding experiments. , 1973, Genetical research.

[32]  P. Burgoyne,et al.  Perinatal oocyte loss in XO mice and its implications for the aetiology of gonadal dysgenesis in XO women. , 1985, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[33]  C. Faiman,et al.  Fertility in women with gonadal dysgenesis. , 1976, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[34]  C. Hasenkampf.  Synaptonemal complex formation in pollen mother cells of Tradescantia , 1984, Chromosoma.

[35]  M. Moses,et al.  Fine structure and behaviour of a pericentric inversion in the sand rat, Psammomys obesus. , 1981, Journal of cell science.