Evaluation of test-strategies for estimating probability of low prevalence of paratuberculosis in Danish dairy herds.

Paratuberculosis is a chronic infection affecting cattle and other ruminants. In the dairy industry, losses due to paratuberculosis can be substantial in infected herds and several countries have implemented national programmes based on herd-classification to manage the disease. The aim of this study was to develop a method to estimate the probability of low within-herd prevalence of paratuberculosis for Danish dairy herds. A stochastic simulation model was developed using the R programming environment. Features of this model included: use of age-specific estimates of test-sensitivity and specificity; use of a distribution of observed values (rather than a fixed, low value) for design prevalence; and estimates of the probability of low prevalence (PrLow) based on a specific number of test-positive animals, rather than for a result less than or equal to a specified cut-point number of reactors. Using this model, five herd-testing strategies were evaluated: (1) milk-ELISA on all lactating cows; (2) milk-ELISA on lactating cows<or=4 years old; (3) milk-ELISA on lactating cows>4 years old; (4) faecal culture on all lactating cows; and (5) milk-ELISA plus faecal culture in series on all lactating cows. The five testing strategies were evaluated using observed milk-ELISA results from 19 Danish dairy herds as well as for simulated results from the same herds assuming that they were uninfected. Whole-herd milk-ELISA was the preferred strategy, and considered the most cost-effective strategy of the five alternatives. The five strategies were all efficient in detecting infection, i.e. estimating a low PrLow in infected herds, however, PrLow estimates for milk-ELISA on age-cohorts were too low in simulated uninfected herds and the strategies involving faecal culture were too expensive to be of practical interest. For simulated uninfected herds, whole-herd milk-ELISA resulted in median PrLow values>0.9 for most herds, depending on herd size and age-structure. None of the strategies provided enough power to establish a high PrLow in smaller herds, or herds with a younger age-structure. Despite this, it appears as if the method is a useful approach for herd-classification for most herds in the Danish dairy industry.

[1]  T. Carpenter,et al.  Effects of Prevalence and Testing by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay and Fecal Culture on the Risk of Introduction of Mycobacterium Avium subsp. Paratuberculosis—Infected Cows into Dairy Herds , 2004, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[2]  N. Toft,et al.  Age-specific characteristics of ELISA and fecal culture for purpose-specific testing for paratuberculosis. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  B. Gladen,et al.  Estimating prevalence from the results of a screening test. , 1978, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  B. Bibby,et al.  Bayesian mixture models for within-herd prevalence estimates of bovine paratuberculosis based on a continuous ELISA response. , 2007, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[5]  J. Galvin,et al.  Estimate of the sensitivity of an ELISA used to detect Johne's disease in Victorian dairy cattle herds. , 2004, Australian veterinary journal.

[6]  W. Johnson,et al.  Simulation model for evaluation of testing strategies for detection of paratuberculosis in midwestern US dairy herds. , 2008, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[7]  S. Nielsen.  Variance components of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of IgG antibodies in milk samples to Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in dairy cattle. , 2002, Journal of veterinary medicine. B, Infectious diseases and veterinary public health.

[8]  Mohamed Shoukri,et al.  Evaluating the health status of herds based on tests applied to individuals , 1992 .

[9]  I A Gardner,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian model for prevalence inferences and determination of a country's status for an animal pathogen. , 2002, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[10]  H. V. Van Kruiningen,et al.  Ruminant paratuberculosis (Johne's disease): the current status and future prospects. , 1984, The Cornell veterinarian.

[11]  W. Johnson,et al.  Evaluation of cost-effectiveness of targeted sampling methods for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis infection in dairy herds. , 2006 .

[12]  A R Cameron,et al.  Two-stage sampling in surveys to substantiate freedom from disease. , 1998, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[13]  R W Sweeney,et al.  Transmission of paratuberculosis. , 1994, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[14]  A. Naugle,et al.  Sensitivity of test strategies used in the Voluntary Johne's Disease Herd Status Program for detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis infection in dairy cattle herds. , 2002, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[15]  G. Benedictus,et al.  Dutch paratuberculosis programme history, principles and development. , 2000, Veterinary microbiology.

[16]  H. Barkema,et al.  Evaluation of three ELISAs for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis using tissue and fecal culture as comparison standards. , 2005, Veterinary microbiology.

[17]  P A J Martin,et al.  Demonstrating freedom from disease using multiple complex data sources 1: a new methodology based on scenario trees. , 2007, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[18]  G. Benedictus,et al.  Control of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection in agricultural species. , 2001, Revue scientifique et technique.

[19]  R. Condron,et al.  Comparison of the Johne's absorbed EIA and the complement-fixation test for the diagnosis of Johne's disease in cattle. , 1991, Australian veterinary journal.

[20]  R. Whittington,et al.  Progress towards understanding the spread, detection and control of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis in animal populations. , 2001, Australian veterinary journal.

[21]  James E. Collins,et al.  Evaluation of Five Antibody Detection Tests for Diagnosis of Bovine Paratuberculosis , 2005, Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology.

[22]  M. Nielen,et al.  Simulation of alternatives for the Dutch Johne's disease certification-and-monitoring program. , 2004, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[23]  J. Muskens.  The effect of biosecurity measures for paratuberculosis on the seroprevalence in Dutch dairy herds , 2005 .

[24]  A. Christoffersen,et al.  Comparison of contamination and growth of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis on two different media , 2004, Journal of applied microbiology.

[25]  J. Stabel,et al.  Evaluation of a commercial ELISA for diagnosis of paratuberculosis in cattle. , 2001, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.