Innovation investment and economic performance in transition economies: Evidence from Slovenia

Abstract This research investigates the relationship between innovation expenditure and its economic performance in 2503 companies. The findings show higher innovation expenditure productivity in the group of Leaders; each euro invested in innovation yields EUR 13.90, but just EUR 7.70 in the group of Followers. ROE is 40% higher in Leaders. Recommendations are provided as to the improvement of business processes and results: financial investments in innovation should be increased in Followers, while simultaneously a substantial improvement in the efficiency of exploiting existing assets is essential. Companies should increase their expenditure on extramural R&D, acquisition of external knowledge (concept of open innovation model) and market introduction of innovations. Further on, we compared some financial data on Slovenian companies with EU average data. The results clearly indicate that Slovenian innovation expenditures are relatively high but not being applied optimally to achieve economic results that compare to the EU average.

[1]  Michael D. Michalisin Validity of annual report assertions about innovativeness: an empirical investigation , 2001 .

[2]  Andy Neely,et al.  INNOVATION AND BUSINESS PERFORMANCE : A LITERATURE REVIEW Commissioned , 2001 .

[3]  Samo Drobne,et al.  Graduates opinion on efficiency of study programmes of surveying , 2006 .

[4]  Paul Geroski,et al.  Do Innovating Firms Outperform Non Innovators , 1992 .

[5]  Borut Likar,et al.  Statistical Analysis for Strategic Innovation Decisions in Slovenian Mechanical Industry , 2010 .

[6]  Mitja Ruzzier,et al.  Developing and testing a multi‐dimensional knowledge management model on Slovenian SMEs , 2011 .

[7]  R. Cooper,et al.  Winning Businesses in Product Development: The Critical Success Factors , 1996 .

[9]  M. Kafouros,et al.  The Role of Time in Assessing the Economic Effects of R&D , 2008 .

[10]  K. Soderquist,et al.  Managing innovation in SMEs: a comparison of companies in the UK, France and Portugal , 2014 .

[11]  Berend Wierenga,et al.  Erim Report Series Research in Management the Effectiveness of Different Mechanisms for Integrating Marketing and R & D Bibliographic Data and Classifications , 2022 .

[12]  Matjaz Mulej,et al.  Development economics' view on growing entrepreneurship in Slovenia , 2008 .

[13]  B. Likar,et al.  Going More Open in Innovation: Does it Pay? , 2010 .

[14]  S. Roper,et al.  Modelling the innovation value chain , 2008 .

[15]  R. Parthasarthy,et al.  Product innovation input and outcome: moderating effects of the innovation process , 2002 .

[16]  Tarantola Stefano,et al.  European Innovation Scoreboard 2006 - Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance , 2007 .

[17]  M. Freel,et al.  Patterns of innovation and skills in small firms , 2005 .

[18]  Seema Sharma,et al.  Inter-country R&D efficiency analysis: An application of data envelopment analysis , 2008, Scientometrics.

[19]  H. Ernst Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level , 2001 .

[20]  Rod Coombs,et al.  A literature-based innovation output indicator , 1996 .

[21]  Heinz Hollenstein,et al.  A composite indicator of a firm's innovativeness. An empirical analysis based on survey data for Swiss manufacturing , 1996 .

[22]  Ljiljana Božić,et al.  The antecedents of SME innovativeness in an emerging transition economy , 2009 .