A global perspective of the richness and evenness of traditional crop-variety diversity maintained by farming communities

Varietal data from 27 crop species from five continents were drawn together to determine overall trends in crop varietal diversity on farm. Measurements of richness, evenness, and divergence showed that considerable crop genetic diversity continues to be maintained on farm, in the form of traditional crop varieties. Major staples had higher richness and evenness than nonstaples. Variety richness for clonal species was much higher than that of other breeding systems. A close linear relationship between traditional variety richness and evenness (both transformed), empirically derived from data spanning a wide range of crops and countries, was found both at household and community levels. Fitting a neutral “function” to traditional variety diversity relationships, comparable to a species abundance distribution of “neutral ecology,” provided a benchmark to assess the standing diversity on farm. In some cases, high dominance occurred, with much of the variety richness held at low frequencies. This suggested that diversity may be maintained as an insurance to meet future environmental changes or social and economic needs. In other cases, a more even frequency distribution of varieties was found, possibly implying that farmers are selecting varieties to service a diversity of current needs and purposes. Divergence estimates, measured as the proportion of community evenness displayed among farmers, underscore the importance of a large number of small farms adopting distinctly diverse varietal strategies as a major force that maintains crop genetic diversity on farm.

[1]  J. Hamrick,et al.  Allozyme Diversity in Cultivated Crops , 1997 .

[2]  Nigel Maxted,et al.  Plant Genetic Conservation: The in situ approach , 1997 .

[3]  S. Brush,et al.  Maize diversity and ethnolinguistic diversity in Chiapas, Mexico. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  T. Hodgkin,et al.  Diversity in landraces of cereal and legume crops , 2010 .

[5]  S. Brush In Situ Conservation of Landraces in Centers of Crop Diversity , 1995 .

[6]  B. McGill A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity , 2003, Nature.

[7]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[8]  S. Brush Genes in the Field : On-Farm Conservation of Crop Diversity , 1999 .

[9]  H. D. Cooper,et al.  Managing biodiversity in agricultural ecosystems , 2007 .

[10]  D. M. Bates Managing Plant Genetic Diversity , 2002, Heredity.

[11]  G. Bell Neutral macroecology. , 2001, Science.

[12]  V. Ramanatha Rao,et al.  Managing Plant Genetic Diversity , 2002 .

[13]  P. Bretting,et al.  Dynamic Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources , 1997 .

[14]  S. Brush Farmers' Bounty: Locating Crop Diversity in the Contemporary World , 2004 .

[15]  W. W. Daniel Applied Nonparametric Statistics , 1979 .

[16]  M. Smale,et al.  A training guide for in situ conservation on-farm: version 1. , 2000 .

[17]  The Conservation of Plant Biodiversity , 1995 .

[18]  R. Ornduff,et al.  Crops and Man. , 1977 .

[19]  M. Smale Valuing Crop Biodiversity: On-Farm Genetic Resources and Economic Change , 2005 .

[20]  V. Grant IN PLANT SPECIES , 1966 .

[21]  C. Fowler,et al.  Plant genetic resources for food and agriculture: Assessing global availability , 2004 .

[22]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .

[23]  B. Pickersgill Farmers' Bounty: Locating Crop Diversity in the Contemporary World , 2005 .

[24]  D. Levin The Nature of Plant Species , 1979, Nature.

[25]  A. Magurran,et al.  Measuring Biological Diversity , 2004 .