The orbital stability of planets trapped in the first-order mean-motion resonances

Many extrasolar planetary systems containing multiple super-Earths have been discovered. N-body simulations taking into account standard type-I planetary migration suggest that protoplanets are captured into mean-motion resonant orbits near the inner disk edge at which the migration is halted. Previous N-body simulations suggested that orbital stability of the resonant systems depends on number of the captured planets. In the unstable case, through close scattering and merging between planets, non-resonant multiple systems are finally formed. In this paper, we investigate the critical number of the resonantly trapped planets beyond which orbital instability occurs after disk gas depletion. We find that when the total number of planets (N) is larger than the critical number (Ncrit), crossing time that is a timescale of initiation of the orbital instability is similar to non-resonant cases, while the orbital instability never occurs within the orbital calculation time (108 Kepler time) for N⩽Ncrit. Thus, the transition of crossing time across the critical number is drastic. When all the planets are trapped in 7:6 resonance of adjacent pairs, Ncrit=4. We examine the dependence of the critical number of 4:3, 6:5 and 8:7 resonance by changing the orbital separation in mutual Hill radii and planetary mass. The critical number increases with increasing the orbital separation in mutual Hill radii with fixed planetary mass and increases with increasing planetary mass with fixed the orbital separation in mutual Hill radii. We also calculate the case of a system which is not composed of the same resonance. The sharp transition of the stability can be responsible for the diversity of multiple super-Earths (non-resonant or resonant), that is being revealed by Kepler Mission.

[1]  J. Papaloizou Tidal interactions in multi-planet systems , 2011, 1107.4488.

[2]  C. J. Cohen,et al.  LIBRATION OF THE CLOSE APPROACHES OF PLUTO TO NEPTUNE , 1965 .

[3]  Orbital Stability of a Protoplanet System under a Drag Force Proportional to the Random Velocity , 2002 .

[4]  N-BODY SIMULATIONS OF PLANETARY ACCRETION AROUND M DWARF STARS , 2009, 0904.4543.

[5]  K. Nakazawa,et al.  The Gas-Drag Effect on the Orbital Instability of a Protoplanet System , 2001 .

[6]  J. Papaloizou,et al.  On the dynamics of multiple systems of hot super-Earths and Neptunes: tidal circularization, resonance and the HD 40307 system , 2010, 1002.2125.

[7]  Douglas N. C. Lin,et al.  Post-oligarchic Evolution of Protoplanetary Embryos and the Stability of Planetary Systems , 2007, 0705.2164.

[8]  Junichiro Makino,et al.  The Stability of Protoplanet Systems , 1999 .

[9]  William R. Ward,et al.  Three-Dimensional Interaction between a Planet and an Isothermal Gaseous Disk. I. Corotation and Lindblad Torques and Planet Migration , 2002 .

[10]  Hidekazu Tanaka,et al.  Three-dimensional Interaction between a Planet and an Isothermal Gaseous Disk. II. Eccentricity Waves and Bending Waves , 2004 .

[11]  C. Murray,et al.  Solar System Dynamics: Expansion of the Disturbing Function , 1999 .

[12]  Alice C. Quillen,et al.  Three‐body resonance overlap in closely spaced multiple‐planet systems , 2011, 1106.0156.

[13]  John C. Geary,et al.  ARCHITECTURE OF KEPLER'S MULTI-TRANSITING SYSTEMS. II. NEW INVESTIGATIONS WITH TWICE AS MANY CANDIDATES , 2012, The Astrophysical Journal.

[14]  Migration and the Formation of Systems of Hot Super-Earths and Neptunes , 2006, astro-ph/0609779.

[15]  F. Fressin,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY KEPLER. II. ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST FOUR MONTHS OF DATA , 2011, 1102.0541.

[16]  John E. Chambers,et al.  The Stability of Multi-Planet Systems , 1996 .

[17]  Jon M. Jenkins,et al.  ARCHITECTURE AND DYNAMICS OF KEPLER'S CANDIDATE MULTIPLE TRANSITING PLANET SYSTEMS , 2011, 1102.0543.

[18]  J. Lissauer,et al.  Orbital Stability of the Uranian Satellite System , 1997 .

[19]  Orbital Stability of Protoplanetary Systems in Nebular Gas and Implications for Terrestrial Planet Formation , 2006 .

[20]  F. Fressin,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF KEPLER PLANETARY CANDIDATES BASED ON THE FIRST DATA SET , 2010, 1006.2799.

[21]  Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network,et al.  PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY KEPLER. III. ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST 16 MONTHS OF DATA , 2012, 1202.5852.

[22]  Jack J. Lissauer,et al.  Orbital stability of systems of closely-spaced planets , 2009 .

[23]  E. Ford,et al.  Identifying non-resonant Kepler planetary systems , 2011, 1111.0299.

[24]  S. Ida,et al.  ECCENTRICITY TRAP: TRAPPING OF RESONANTLY INTERACTING PLANETS NEAR THE DISK INNER EDGE , 2010, 1008.0461.